MongoDB Atlas Reviews

We use it for all of our temporary data, anything which is not warehoused.

It works with AWS Lamda and EC2.

It is nice because our developers create tables whenever they need to sync data. There are allocations nor DBAs. It is just use it as you need it.

• Autoscaling
• No overhead
• No maintenance

We had some bad trainers when we first came onboard and would rate them fairly low. They did not seem staffed properly to fulfill the training services that they offered.

It is very stable. It has been running without issues.

We have about 2000 customers a day.

The pricing is good. We originally chose it over DynamoDB because of the pricing.

We also looked at DynamoDB from Amazon. However, it didn't have the features that we wanted from MongoDB.

We chose MongoDB based on its pricing and features.

I have been happy with the service. Everything is good. Though, nothing stands out to me as exceptional. 

I would encourage someone to look at DynamoDB, even though I am fine with MongoDB. If you are in a fully integrated into the AWS environment, you might want to stick with Amazon Web Services rather than a third-party.

We use it as a service, so we don't configure anything.

• High availability
• Resource recovery

It brought a lot of confidence to our team.

• High availability
• Zero maintenance, to double up things.

The cost needs improvement. The product is good, but the cost that we paid for it is expensive, so it wasn't that valuable.

The reliability is good.

It is reliable. We have a small environment right now.

The integration and configuration of this product in our AWS environment were easy and straightforward.

AWS works well with this application, but that is the only thing we have tested. We are happy with it.

Purchasing through the AWS Marketplace was easy and seamless. We chose the AWS Marketplace because it is a brand name and a popular product.

It is too expensive. They need to work on this.

I also evaluated the open source version of this same product, but chose the AWS version for more reliability and enterprise support.

I would recommend the product.

I have only used the AWS version.

Any business types where we need instructional data.

In a previous company where I worked, we were able to use MongoDB as a pure data storage using the block storage mechanism for our clients.

You can start quickly on projects which allow you to store many things.

I would like a more comprehensive dashboard. The UI can be difficult to understand.

Going forward, we would like to have pure AWS Cloud (native) storage instead regular storage on the AWS integration side.

The stability is very good.

In my previous company, we had a lot of data coming in every day, and the product remained stable.

We have been able to scale from gigabytes to terabytes easily.

I have never used technical support.

The integration and configuration of MongoDB in the AWS environment is quite good.

In my previous company, the product allowed use to build a database in a highly regulated environment with the ability to get distributed storage. We used MongoDB as a distributed storage to set up this environment for a critical business application with millions of dollars.

My advice is make developers understand NoSQL databases. For people coming from the SQL world, this is a new way to develop applications and that is the point to focus on. In the NoSQL world, MongoDB is a product that has a good awareness and has proven to be very good.

Our clients also evaluate Cassandra or other key value storage vendors. Its depends on what they want to do exactly. MongoDB is somewhere in the middle between pure key value and something like Cassandra, which is designed for bigger deployments.

MongoDB is fortunately well known now in the development community and has a good framework for languages, which is why our clients chose the product.

We are always integrating this product with our business applications because it is a database. Without our applications, the product doesn't make sense. The integration is quite straightforward, because of the consistences within MongoDB, you can find where to connect it.

I have used both the AWS and the on-premise versions. The AWS integration allows you to go faster in terms of deployment and the tooling in the cloud also allows you to go faster.

We use it for hosting data on the cloud.

It enables us to get work done quickly and get to our data. It benefits us by providing performance.

• As a user, it is very easy to use. There is nothing complicated.
• We can write queries and go through it very quickly; our queries are quicker with it. 
• Many tools are there. Other companies are providing many tools for getting to your MongoDB.

The import and export process needs improvement, i.e., getting in and out. Moving data from other databases into MongoDB, along with indexing, was challenging. However, it has been improving.

I would like them to make the product easier to use.

We are happy right now with stability unless something goes wrong down the line. In that case, you have to bite the bullet.

In terms of workloads, we put 60 to 80 percent on it.

So far, so good. However, we have had issues with our VPC, and how we have stored on S3 and our instances that we have with MongoDB. We are learning as we are building more capacity.

Our environment is utility customers, which is millions of meters, and each one has their own instance. We obtain that data for every 15 minutes in a big city environment, which is why performance is very important.

The technical support is good. We have received very good feedback.

The integration and configuration were pretty easy. We loved it. Otherwise, we would have changed databases.

We have definitely seen ROI.

The purchasing process through the AWS Marketplace was very good.

I was involved later on in the evaluation process when we were looking to import and export data out of MongoDB. We looked at MySQL, but we wanted to be on the cloud instead of managing our data on MySQL.

I would recommend it. It is better than the legacy databases, and it is very good with the cloud.

We integrated it with TestRail and JIRA. Everything is on cloud. It integrates well, and we are happy with it.

I used it for testing.

It provided time saving for me. It provided an easy way to create validation against the database.

As a tester, it was easy to validate data, access data, make active run queries against it, and retrieve data from it.

The UI application for MongoDB crashes a lot, so we would have to use a third-party plugin to make it work. It may have been improved by now.

Except for the UI's stability, the product's overall stability is fine.

The scalability is good.

We did not use the technical support.

Right now, I'm using DynamoDB, and I preferred using MongoDB more.

I would recommend MongoDB. I would like to bring in MongoDB at my new company, though I doubt it will happen.

We use it for patient data.

Our databases used to be in-house. Now, they are in the cloud with MongoDB and everything is much easier.

The speed of it is the most valuable feature.

I would like a better dashboard. It could be made a bit more user friendly. 

We put a large amount of stress on it, and it is able to handle this all the time.

It is very scalable. We have 10,000 employees.

We receive great customer service.

Our purchasing experience on the AWS Marketplace was great. We chose to go through the AWS Marketplace as a small team; my team selected it, and we consist of three people.

The pricing and licensing is great.

We also looked at Cassandra, but we did not find it easy to use.

This product was selected because it was easier to use and more user-friendly.

I would recommend MongoDB.

The integration and configuration of the product on the AWS environment is fine.

We use the AWS version of this product.

We also use WebEx, and it works well.

The product is simple to use and enterprise-ready. It is also open-source. 

I rate the product's stability a nine out of ten. 

The tool's deployment is easy. We used Amazon EC2 Containers to deploy it. 

MongoDB Atlas is a convenient database that you need to start using. I rate it a nine out of ten.  

I use the solution for Web Application creation.

The solution is easily scalable and manageable. Tools can be easily added to the solution.

Customer support needs improvement knowledge-wise.

I have been using the solution for two years.

It is a stable solution. I rate the stability a ten out of ten.

It is a scalable solution. I rate it ten out of ten.

I rate the support an eight out of ten.

The initial setup is straightforward. The deployment takes three hours. I rate the initial setup a ten out of ten.

I have seen a 10% return on investment.

The solution is fairly priced. I rate the pricing a seven out of ten. 

I rate the overall solution an eight out of ten.