The management/load performance is the most valuable feature.
The hardware can be evaluated by its efficient management, resource visibility and easy to use features.
Secondly, performance is the main goal of the machines. I have very good experience with the IBM Server and Storage.
The peak performance has made the organization's key application up and running; it has never failed.
IBM hardware takes time for building/assembling. Also, the firmware update process takes too much time as compared to the other vendors like Dell.
I have used this solution for nine years.
During firmware updates/NIC teaming , some errors were experienced.
There were no scalability issues.
I would rate the technical support a 9/10.
Previously, we were using IBM; it provides the most efficient and reliable computing hardware.
Setup is a little complex, i.e., in terms of the firmware and system updates.
We looked at Dell Chassis M1000e and HPE c7000.
The installation and configuration are a bit difficult but the product's performance is unbeatable.