We are content with the stability of the solution. It is entirely stable, and we have not encountered any significant issues.

I would rate the tool's stability an eight to nine out of ten. 

The tool is very stable. Since we provisioned the box, it hasn't been rebooted yet. It has been 1400 days. I rate the stability a ten out of ten.

It's a very stable product.

I would rate the stability of KVM as a six out of ten. There have been stability issues and occasional crashes with KVM, especially if incorrect commands are executed. Unlike VMware or Proxmox, which offer additional management tools, KVM is more sensitive to command errors and requires precise handling to avoid disruptions.

I can't comment on whether it is stable or not since I have not yet used it to that extent.

The data is in high availability. If my servers undergo maintenance, we switch to another virtual machine host. We delete the maintenance activity, restoring it to the original state, ensuring the users have no downtime.

I rate KVM a nine out of ten for stability.

It is a completely stable solution. While there may be a few bugs, in general, we didn't face any special issues. 

KVM is very stable. I can't compare it to Oracle VM as that's never stable, so Oracle dropped that product.

KVM is extremely stable, to the point where I would give it 5/5 stars for stability.

The stability is just okay. We haven't experienced any major glitches or downtimes.

The product is stable. I rate the stability a ten. 

The solution is highly stable. I rate the stability a ten out of ten. 

The stability is better than Red Hat. I find that it is very stable.

KVM is a stable solution.

KVM is stable, but the product from VMware E6 is not stable and I sometimes have issues with it and then the usage of RAM and CPU is costly in my experience. 

Stability-wise, I rate the solution an eight out of ten.

Stability is guaranteed due to its open-source nature, ensuring reliable deployment. KVM's internal deployment is secure. The primary aspect is its upcoming release of significant features. I would rate it nine out of ten.

KVM is stable.

We haven't had any issues with stability. 

It's a stable solution. I haven't had any complaints from the customers.

When the product is used frequently, it's stable, but if we don't touch it for some time, it needs to get synchronized again with the VGA or the HDMI, and there can be problems with that. 

It is stable.

The solution seems to be quite stable. I haven't had any crashing, or any bugs or glitches so far.

We have experienced some strange problems with instability using KVM. If you install a new driver, HBA, or a new PC network adapter, then you can have problems because of the process of certification for these devices. It happens because KVM is a solution that supports many different kinds of hardware, unlike VMware which is much more restrictive in terms of what it is compatible with. The problem with having such an open solution is that it can also be the cause of issues with stability.

This solution is very stable.

It's straightforward and recoverable, it's easy to do anything.

The solution is very stable. It's been stable since I started using it in 2014.

The stability of this solution is less than other products in the same category. But, it is OK. 

It is a verty stable solution.

The stability is very good. It has not crashed once since we have been using it. 

We have not encountered any stability issues.

When running I/O intensive tasks, or having a very high amount of network packages which need to reach the guest(s). However, all issues were under control after tuning the config of the KVM guests.

No.

In my experience, I haven't encountered any issues with stability. Since I installed and started using it, the system has been working very well.

KVM's stability is fine, assuming it's running on decent hardware.