Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Reviews

We use the solution to cover endpoint security.

We have a concept of working from home. Most endpoints are not in the domain. It is our first line of defense. While we had Kaspersky deployed, it gave good insight into the upcoming challenge or threat. Accordingly, the relevant teams come into action and take good care of it before it blows out of our hands. As a security audit, we ensure that the agents and the machines are in the early stages. It gives us appropriate information, which helps us to keep our environment in a better, safer, and controlled position.

My team was struggling with the reporting when we were doing an audit. The console features are a little more interactive and user-friendly. There's some issue, or maybe some fixing has to be done. I've seen the ground staff struggling a lot over there. The skill set, knowledge transfer, or training can help them to improve.

I have been using Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response as a customer for seven months, whereas my company has been using it for around three years.

The initial setup is not challenging.

The solution is expensive.

Our operation team has used Kaspersky. We are involved in it as a part of my cybersecurity or system audit.

Overall, I rate the solution an eight out of ten.

I use the solution for protection and incident response. 

The tool's performance and prevention are amazing. 

Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response is expensive. It should improve its stability. 

I rate the solution's stability an eight out of ten. 

Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response's installation is straightforward. For organizations with 1000 employees, deployment can take an hour to complete. To deploy the product, you must go to the management portal and push the agents. We rely on one resource to handle deployment and maintenance. It can be handled remotely. 

I rate the solution an eight out of ten.