Imperva Application Security Platform Reviews

We use Imperva DDoS for DDoS protection and security.

Imperva DDoS is fairly stable, and its availability is quite high. I haven't faced any downtime or system instability issues with the solution.

Imperva DDoS does not provide version control. After I make any changes on any portal, I would want to roll back my changes and go back to a stable version if something goes wrong. That particular feature is not there on the UI portal.

They have this roundabout way wherein I can use different tools to integrate, do the versioning, and manage it on my own. It's not directly available, but I can use it indirectly.

I have been using Imperva DDoS for two to three years.

Imperva DDoS is a scalable product.

The solution's initial setup is a bit difficult and not very easy. It's not that time-consuming if you have expertise. Once you get your hands on it, it's pretty straightforward.

Imperva DDoS is deployed on-cloud in our organization.

I would recommend Imperva DDoS to users because it's a fairly stable product.

Overall, I rate Imperva DDoS an eight out of ten.

Our primary use case for the solution is securing our applications and customer-facing website.

The Imperva Web Application Firewall feature I have found the most valuable is the ease of deployment. The solution's customer service is good as well. 

The Imperva Web Application Firewall automations are good, but there is still room for improvement with them. Fast rule propagation could also be improved.

My company has been using Imperva Web Application Firewall for four years. But, personally, I have been using it for three years. It was already operational in the organization when I joined. 

We have not had any issues with stability. 

I think Imperva Web Application Firewall is scalable. 

I have had a positive experience with Imperva Web Application Firewall's tech support so far. They are knowledgeable and respond on time. 

Positive

I was not with the company when Imperva Web Application Firewall was initially deployed but I believe the process was straightforward. 

F5 firewalls are clunky and that is why we do not use them. They are good and powerful, but it takes quite a bit to set them up. They are not as easy to set up as Imperva Web Application Firewall.

I would say: take Imperva Web Application Firewall into consideration because of its simplicity. 

We are using Imperva Web Application Firewall to monitor databases.

The most valuable features of Imperva Web Application Firewall are the monitoring of databases and the dashboards are easy to understand.

Imperva Web Application Firewall could improve the API integration. It was complex for us. Additionally, The onboarding could be better.

I have been using Imperva Web Application Firewall for approximately three months.

Imperva Web Application Firewall is stable.

The scalability of the Imperva Web Application Firewall is good.

The initial setup of the Imperva Web Application Firewall is complex.

I rate the initial setup of Imperva Web Application Firewall a four out of five.

I rate Imperva Web Application Firewall a nine out of ten.

Imperva Web Application Firewall is used for protecting web applications.

The most valuable features of the Imperva Web Application Firewall are performance and flexibility. We can extend or customize the box itself.

Imperva Web Application Firewall could improve the console by making it easier to use. 

I have been using Imperva Web Application Firewall for approximately six years.

Imperva Web Application Firewall is stable.

The stability of the Imperva Web Application Firewall is good.

We have approximately three or four clients using this solution.

The support from Imperva Web Application Firewall is very good. They are handling support well, giving suggestions, and solving the issues.

The initial setup of the Imperva Web Application Firewall is straightforward. The process for us is simple, we have been doing it for years.

We have one person that does the deployment of the Imperva Web Application Firewall.

We sell three-year licenses for Imperva Web Application Firewall to our customers. The price is a little expensive.

I recommend this solution to others.

I rate Imperva Web Application Firewall an eight out of ten.

Previously I was in software development for more than 15 years. I had developed web applications for internet and cable TV companies. Now, I am a sales executive for Imperva Cloud WAF. 

Imperva Cloud WAF, previously Imperva Incapsula, is a web application firewall that is implemented in the cloud. It protects a public facing web application. It will track if a hacker is doing brute force attack. The web application firewall will detect it and block the source. This could be an IP address or the main name specific for a country. You can then update the profile of your server to block those IP addresses where the attack is coming from .

We have placed Imperva Cloud in our client's employee self service system that they are logged into. The website is protected by Imperva so that employees and customers can log in all over the Philippines. The client is a power generation company, which is a critical service, and has branches all over the Philippines.

We partner with a couple of on-premise data centers in the Philippines, one is PIM. They also provide cloud solutions. We bundle our solutions into their cloud projects.

Imperva Incapsula has many valuable features. One, it protects the top 10 OWAS vulnerability, the open web application software platform, this is standard. Secondly, it protects against broken authentication. As well, it has remote execution of code.

Imperva always needs to adjust to new versions of cyber attacks, it needs to be faster, improve the resiliency of the software of the solution.

I have been using Imperva Cloud WAF for three years.

Imperva is stable. Based on Gartner's survey we are top three, meaning we are reliable based on customer feedback.

This is a scalable solution. We have data centers all over the world. The solution can be set up to be optimized wherever the clients are accessing.

Technical support has good response time. I am also the liaison officer for the technical team in Singapore. Support responds quickly and they do attend to the issues that we raise to them.

The implementation of Imperva Cloud WAF is easy. All you need to do is change the DNS settings, because it is a cloud solution there is no appliance that you need to install at the data center. It just changes the DNS settings, and then a couple of IP address and domain name settings to allow a couple of those IP addresses and domain names settings into the firewall of the client and the firewall of Imperva.

The actual installation will only take a few hours and then full implementation within 24 hours. The initial setup takes time because of the configuration on the client-side. We prepared a questionnaire for the client to assist with preparation.

We created a cross-comparison against hiring a team of cybersecurity staff versus getting a subscription. After using Imperva Cloud for the past three years the cost is already acceptable against hiring a team.

The price depends on the client's needs, it will be impacted depending on whether they need diverse production, or account take over for example.

There is an initial four package bundle with the price changing monthly.

I would rate this solution an 8 out of 10.

We have an Akamai cloud-based solution for it. We have an in-house customer, and they have their own Akamai cloud for WAF. As a solution provider, we are working with their private Akamai WAF. 

Configuration for different application sources is most valuable. We can segregate the traffic that an application is carrying and identify the sizing in Imperva.

It is quite proficient in terms of logs reports, and it provides tight control for policy configuration. So, there can't be any unwanted applications on the internal LAN site. It is quite restrictive, which is a plus point. The sizing of an application is quite easy to understand while we are configuring and deploying Imperva.

It should be more user-friendly. Like other web solutions, it would be helpful to be able to easily do policy configuration and identification inside the application. Understanding the in-depth configuration of a policy is somewhat difficult for an engineer, and they can improve that. 

I have about two to three years of experience with Imperva. I'm working as a GA consultant for cybersecurity and information security. I'm working on different security solutions such as WAF, IAM, DDoS, Azure firewall proxy, and antivirus. I work with different customers, and I also do the architecture review or assessment.

Its stability is quite good. It is not at all an issue. 

It is also quite good performance-wise. We are confident about its performance.

It is for large-scale enterprises where the traffic is huge, and there are many internet-facing applications, which is a plus point of Imperva.

We don't have the HA mode for the respective solution in Imperva, which has to be there when we have the DC and DR locations. We can activate only one solution at DC, but while we are conducting the drills between DC and DR, it is quite difficult to import all the configurations at the DR location in Imperva. It takes time.

Their support is good. It is not an issue. Whenever we have any questions or concerns, we're getting an appropriate solution for our queries. 

Some of the clients have had direct support from Imperva, and some of the clients had a third-party vendor. We also get support from a local Imperva employee. When I was working for a bank, there was good support from this person who was working with Imperva. 

The support for the setup is very good from the provider, but it can be difficult for an engineer to have an in-depth understanding of the configuration of a policy for an application.

I would rate it an eight out of 10.

We use this product as our Web Application Firewall. It provides web-based protection for us. Our requirements are not very complex.

Some maintenance must be performed by our IT team.

We have been working with Imperva Incapsula for two years.

The stability is okay. We use it extensively, on a daily basis. The firewall operates 24 hours per day.

We have approximately 500 employees that are protected with this product.

We have not had any problems with their technical support.

We did not use another Web Application Firewall before Imperva.

Incapsula is not a difficult product to deploy.

The vendor assisted us with the deployment.

We have an IT support team that is responsible for maintenance.

We have a yearly contract and I am happy with the pricing. Imperva charges us based on bandwidth, which is better than other vendors that charge us according to data transfer. In these cases, our costs are quite high.

Outside of our package, there are no additional fees.

Overall, I am really happy with this solution. This includes the features and capabilities, as well as the cost. It fits our requirements, as well as our budget.

I would rate this solution a nine out of ten.

We offer implementation services for our customers.

Most customers use Imperva Incapsula to protect themselves from WAF attacks. If they need an application load balancing, whether it is on a single data center or if they have a B2B extension. Also, if they need protection from the bots. Imperva has all of those functionalities.

It's very pretty easy to onboard the URL. One of the unique features included with Imperva is its advanced bot protection. In addition the base licensing modules with most of the features.

In terms of features, Imperva is quite good; it outperforms its competitors.

Pricing could be more competitive.

It would be beneficial to include vulnerability management in the solution, similar to what they have for their on-premise solution.

I have been working with Imperva Incapsula for more than three years.

I have been using the latest update.

The stability is quite good. It has an uptime of 99%. None of our customers have complained about its uptime and its availability.

The majority of our customers are enterprise businesses, with some SMB, but it depends on their budget, as well as their needs, and whether it is for security or compliance purposes.

Imperva is quite expensive for organizations that use it for compliance purposes. Other WAP solutions, such as Fortinet or Barracuda, which are slightly less expensive than Imperva, will be considered.

Imperva Incapsula is easy to scale.

I believe that Technical support is 24/7. They are also very quick to respond via email.

We work with all of the Imperva solutions from the database, monitoring tools, and the web applications firewall.

The initial setup Is quite simple and straightforward. We only have seven steps to follow. It's a very simple and straightforward process.

If the customer agrees to a DNS sense, it will take no more than 10 to 15 minutes.

Imperva is responsible for maintenance.

Incapsula is a SaaS (software-as-a-service) provider. Anyone can do the applications, but you must subscribe to the service.

Pricing is a challenge for most of our customers.

I cannot provide a comparison because I have not worked with any other vendors.

I would recommend this solution to others because it is pretty simple to implement, and you don't need a dedicated WAP technician to maintain this solution. 

Anyone in the organization can easily implement it, and it can be maintained with a little application knowledge. On the application side, you do not need to be a subject matter expert it is not necessary.

I would rate Imperva Incapsula a nine out of ten.