CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager Reviews

There are a lot of companies that have servers that want to monitor their members if they do something that violates their policy.

The most valuable feature of CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is its high performance, it's the best identity security platform. The security is good. It's easy to showcase the feature and capabilities and compare it with other competitors. It competes well with other solutions. Additionally, it is a complete solution.

The solution can be complex to use at times.

CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager has a lot of integrated APIs. Some of them are outdated and could be improved.

I have been using CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager for approximately one year.

I rate the stability of CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager a seven out of ten.

I rate the scalability of CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager a seven out of ten.

The support from CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is good.

The initial setup of CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager can be complex. It took approximately six hours to complete the installation.

I rate the initial setup of CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager a seven out of ten.

The solution requires an annual license to use it. There can be some extra costs in some cases.

I would recommend this solution to others.

I rate CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager a nine out of ten.

Our primary use case for this solution is to manage enterprise passwords and monitor session connections.

Prior to using this solution, we did not know where our accounts were being created. The DNS scanning is a very good tool that allows us to manage existing accounts.

While I find all of the features valuable, one of them that stands out is the DNS scanning. This provides information with respect to the locations of accounts that are created. We then get an overview of the location information. 

What I would really like to see improved is the AIM (Application Identity Manager). I think that it could be simpler to use, and much more straight forward.

In terms of additional features, I cannot think of any that I would like to see implemented at the moment.

I find the product to be very stable.

This product is very, very scalable. Currently we have about one hundred users, and we have plans to increase the usage.

I found the technical support to be good. They are always available and ready to answer questions and provide support.

No, beyond evaluating other solutions we did not use a different one.

I found the initial setup to be quite complex. You really have to pay attention to detail during the process, because any mistake will render the installation and setup useless.

For an experienced system implementer it will take approximately one day. However, for somebody who is inexperienced it may take up to five days.

Once the deployment is complete, no staff is required for maintaining the solution. Everything is pretty much straight forward.

We take care of the implementation for our customers.

We have indeed seen a return on investment with this solution. I cannot put a monetary value on it, but it is valuable information that we are protecting. If it were to be leaked then it would result in damage to reputation, as well as a loss in confidence.

As I am the technical contact for this product, I do not have direct knowledge of the pricing. However, I can say that the licensing for this solution is based on the number of APV (privileged users), and the number of sessions that you want to record.

Yes, we evaluated three other products before choosing this one. They were Security from CA, BeyondTrust, and ObserveIT.

This is the number one product for privilege account security.

I suggest getting the best help available when it comes time to implement and deploy this solution. Once this is complete, everything else will fall into place.

I would rate this product eight out of ten. It is very good, but there is always room for improvement.

It has removed the need for the local admin.

It identifies the original source, and all instances of malicious applications in the environment.

Some technical admins create crazy rules, which allow the staff to run anything they want. Currently I'm reviewing our Viewfinity rules and I have noticed different kinds of rules, such as permitting any installation from "download folder." I would suggest that Viewfinity add a new feature which refuses these rules.

I've used it for four years.

There have been no issues with the deployment.

There have been no issues with its stability.

There have been no issues with the scalability.

9/10

8/10

It was complex to introduction the product to the end-users and the technical team.

We have better product management, review, and the training of our admins.

We're comparing Viewfinity to Bit9.

Keep the product managed by specialists and create global rules.