We compared SailPoint IdentityIQ and Veza Core Authorization Platform based on our users reviews.
Our conclusion is that In comparing SailPoint IdentityIQ to Veza Core Authorization Platform, it is evident that they have distinct differences. SailPoint IdentityIQ necessitates a more intricate initial setup and expertise, but it offers a broad array of features and customization choices. It requires improvements in pricing and user interface, as well as enhanced integration and technical support. Conversely, Veza Core Authorization Platform is highly regarded for its effortless deployment, user-friendly interface, and robust access control capabilities. However, it has drawbacks in terms of user interface, documentation and support, integration capabilities, performance and stability, and customization options. Nevertheless, its customer service and support receive positive feedback.
We primarily focused on the topics below:
The summary above is based on 25 interviews we conducted with our users. To access the interviews' full transcripts, download our report.
Earn 20 points
SailPoint IdentityIQ is ranked 2nd in Identity Management (IM) with 61 reviews while Veza Core Authorization Platform is ranked 37th in Identity Management (IM). SailPoint IdentityIQ is rated 8.2, while Veza Core Authorization Platform is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of SailPoint IdentityIQ writes "Flexible, easy to customize, and not too difficult to set up". On the other hand, SailPoint IdentityIQ is most compared with Saviynt, Microsoft Entra ID, One Identity Manager, ForgeRock and Oracle Identity Governance, whereas Veza Core Authorization Platform is most compared with Saviynt, Varonis Platform and Okta Workforce Identity.
See our list of best Identity Management (IM) vendors.
We monitor all Identity Management (IM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.