We performed a comparison between Oracle BPEL and Pega BPM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Process Automation solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The product has everything we need."
"What I find the most valuable about Oracle BPEL is that it saves me time."
"The stability has been good. We haven't had any issues."
"Allowed us to develop and quickly release with confidence using cloud technologies."
"Case Management, as well as Workflow Automation, are Pega's most powerful capabilities."
"Pricing is a little on the high side."
"The most valuable features of Pega BPM are low code, no code, functionality, and easy development."
"The most valuable feature is flexibility, as we can configure it to best suit our requirements."
"Pega is a local platform that has evolved from a BPM perspective. This allows teams using this solution to address complexities without having deep knowledge in a specific development area."
"The most valuable features are case management and integration services."
"In the next release, I would like to see REST improved and new technologies for microservices. I'd like to see more containers for separating containers."
"Some user-defined functions for transformation must be added to the next release of the solution."
"Pega Cloud early adoption and use for cross enterprise capability was new to many. The early adoption meant version 2.0 of their cloud service may require refactoring and redesign of some services."
"There have been some performance scalability issues. Suppose you want to add more users. You go from, say, 800 users to 1,500 users, and sometimes that creates issues for which there is no clear explanation. To fix it you have to escalate it with customer service and sometimes the response is not up to the mark in resolving those issues."
"I believe they simplify the application development. It is still complex. The learning is not easy, it takes time compared to other products on the market."
"There is a scarcity of resources who have worked with this solution before."
"It is not fully compatible with all versions of Internet Explorer, so sometimes, it does not work."
"Business specific functionality is needed."
"The solution would benefit from more integration capabilities."
"The workflow automation can be slow, so there is room for improvement there."
Oracle BPEL is ranked 16th in Process Automation with 2 reviews while Pega BPM is ranked 2nd in Process Automation with 55 reviews. Oracle BPEL is rated 9.0, while Pega BPM is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Oracle BPEL writes "A highly scalable solution that provides various features for the execution of business processes". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Pega BPM writes "Low code with great APIs and good flexibility". Oracle BPEL is most compared with Camunda, BizTalk Server and Bonita, whereas Pega BPM is most compared with ServiceNow, Camunda, Appian, Microsoft Power Apps and IBM BPM. See our Oracle BPEL vs. Pega BPM report.
See our list of best Process Automation vendors.
We monitor all Process Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.