Microsoft Office SharePoint Server vs Zoho Cliq comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Microsoft Logo
2,570 views|2,418 comparisons
76% willing to recommend
Zoho Logo
152 views|115 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Microsoft Office SharePoint Server and Zoho Cliq based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Dropbox, Box, Microsoft and others in Content Collaboration Platforms.
To learn more, read our detailed Content Collaboration Platforms Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,924 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
RicardoPedro
Anand Bala
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The collaboration, the ability for multiple users to work on a single document.""The solution is scalable. You can do both horizontal and vertical scaling.""This solution has provided us with a collaborative workspace to allow everyone to work together and be on the same page.""The solution's most valuable aspects are its collaboration capabilities, its communications site and the innovation within the product itself.""The most valuable feature of this solution is the Communication Site.""The solution is pretty easy to use for the most part.""It is a decent tool for collaboration, especially if you are already using other Office products.""The most valuable features for us are their document management list and hybrid forms. and We also use third party ad-dons to achieve workflows and other recent apps."

More Microsoft Office SharePoint Server Pros →

"It works fine on lower networks as well."

More Zoho Cliq Pros →

Cons
"The permission management features need improvement.""The search feature needs improvement. I can never find the information I need when I use it.""The solution needs to have more flexibility. The classic version had more flexibility, however, the modern version has many more limitations.""The solution needs to enable better sharing capabilities between users and external users. Several users also have problems with linking their emails to their Microsoft account.""I would like to see more Agile techniques and seamless integration with other applications.""Technical support could be improved. They are not fast enough, especially when we'll go deeper in the product itself. More complex issues make it very tough to find someone that can help you.""The GUI is outdated.""The ability to preview files in different formats should be expanded to include formats such as embedded postscript (EPS), AutoCAD, and Adobe Acrobat PDF."

More Microsoft Office SharePoint Server Cons →

"They should reduce data consumption and improve network connection for video calls."

More Zoho Cliq Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "One of the reasons why we don't recommend the cloud version of SharePoint is the cost. With the on premise version, you pay for the license once. For the cloud version, there is a recurring fee. It is very expensive. They expect everyone to pay $20 or $30 per user per month."
  • "There are some aggressive discounts offered by Microsoft for organizations that are not for profit, which we are, and it makes it quite attractive to consider."
  • "Pricing plans may be flexible depending on volume usage and your corporate relationship with Microsoft."
  • "It can be expensive for on-premises deployments, especially when you have to support SQL Server as your backend database. That's where the cost comes into play. SQL Server has its own licensing, which Microsoft keeps on changing. Therefore, it can become costly. In the earlier versions of SharePoint, version 2007 or 2010, they had an express version where the SQL Server licensing was free. It wasn't like a full-blown SharePoint. It was only a slimmed-down version. It used to be whatever your hardware costs. You would install the free software and work with it, but you were very limited in what you could do in SharePoint. If you wanted the SharePoint Enterprise Server with all the bells and whistles, then you had to pay more to get the SQL Server license based on the number of users or servers. The subscription model is different for cloud deployments. Licensing is per user and per month. The cost also depends on the storage required. If you have a lot of sites or documents, then you need to expand it based on your needs."
  • More Microsoft Office SharePoint Server Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "It is a cost-efficient solution."
  • More Zoho Cliq Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Content Collaboration Platforms solutions are best for your needs.
    768,924 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Top Answer:It works fine on lower networks as well.
    Top Answer:The solution is cost-efficient. Also, it offers a few free trials to explore different features.
    Top Answer:They should reduce data consumption and improve network connection for video calls. Also, they should add a feature for video messaging.
    Ranking
    Views
    2,570
    Comparisons
    2,418
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Views
    152
    Comparisons
    115
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    221
    Rating
    8.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Office SharePoint Server, MS Office SharePoint Server
    Learn More
    Overview

    Microsoft Office SharePoint Server (MOSS) is a Microsoft software portal based on the ASP.NET framework. MOSS facilitates file sharing and collaboration, social networking, Web databases and Web publishing. It is hosted by Microsoft Windows Server and is accessible through Microsoft Office or the Web.

    Streamline your team communication to move work forward

    Zoho Cliq simplifies your team communication with organized conversations, information that's easy to find and by connecting to the tools you love.

    Sample Customers
    Del Monte Foods, Unicredit Leasing, Dudley Metropolitan Borough Council, Nokia Czech Republic, Perkins Eastman, JLL, ICA, óxito Software, Dorset Software, PKP Cargo, Arcapita Bank B.S.C., AVE CZ, Chesapeake Energy
    GameVision, CRCC Asia, Purolite, FundsIndia, GPSS, europebet
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company21%
    Retailer14%
    Manufacturing Company14%
    Government7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company12%
    Financial Services Firm9%
    Government9%
    Comms Service Provider7%
    No Data Available
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business28%
    Midsize Enterprise36%
    Large Enterprise36%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business25%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise62%
    No Data Available
    Buyer's Guide
    Content Collaboration Platforms
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Dropbox, Box, Microsoft and others in Content Collaboration Platforms. Updated: April 2024.
    768,924 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Microsoft Office SharePoint Server is ranked 11th in Content Collaboration Platforms while Zoho Cliq is ranked 11th in Enterprise Social Software with 1 review. Microsoft Office SharePoint Server is rated 7.6, while Zoho Cliq is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Microsoft Office SharePoint Server writes "Stable, integrates well with Teams, and has flexible and helpful support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Zoho Cliq writes "Provides ease of communication and is a stable solution ". Microsoft Office SharePoint Server is most compared with Amazon WorkDocs, Datto Workplace, FileCloud, Kiteworks and HCL Connections, whereas Zoho Cliq is most compared with Slack and Microsoft Teams.

    We monitor all Content Collaboration Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.