We performed a comparison between Informatica Data Integration Hub and SAP Process Orchestration based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Informatica, Oracle and others in Data Integration."The technical support services are good."
"The MDM solution is capable of integrating multiple systems, so it helped us to solve the purpose of centralizing the depository as well as the standardization of mass data. It takes away all the ambiguity around data integrity issues or all the process challenges which happen when every stage of a process uses a different source as master data."
"Performance and flexibility-wise, they're very user-friendly."
"The initial setup was straightforward."
"The solution offers very good documentation and manuals to assist with understanding the solution."
"The most valuable feature of SAP Process Orchestration is its flexibility in being able to build integrations with SAP systems and non-SAP systems."
"The initial setup is easy...The solution gets automatically connected. The deployment takes six months. I rate its setup phase a ten out of ten."
"The solution is easy to use."
"Great monitoring tools and has its own alert framework."
"SAP Process Orchestration has all the features that are necessary."
"The monitoring tools are the most valuable feature."
"They could provide more robust performance for data integration processes. It would help in improving the data quality more efficiently."
"When it comes to UI look and feel and user experience, Informatica is not as good as other solutions."
"The initial setup was not very straightforward. Not complex, but not very simple either."
"It's very difficult to find errors in a simple way."
"In terms of technical support, it would be helpful if they handled the tickets a bit faster when queries are sent to them."
"I think the main area that SAP PO should improve on is offering pre-delivered content like they do when you use SAP Cloud Platform Integration (CPI). SAP should not forget that they still have a lot of customers using Process Orchestration and they should focus more on providing pre-delivered content in SAP PO."
"Data modeling is an area of concern in the product where improvements are required."
"This is an on-premise platform and one area they can improve on is having the ability to work with SaaS solutions."
"It is scalable, but there can be performance issues with high data volume or traffic, especially during month ends."
"The solution is not very scalable because it is at the end of its life."
"SAP Process Orchestration could improve from an API standpoint. This is not an API management tool, which is one of its drawbacks. However, SAP has released an SAP Cloud Platform Integration which has all of the features, such as API management along with process integration to replace what they had previously."
More Informatica Data Integration Hub Pricing and Cost Advice →
Informatica Data Integration Hub is ranked 37th in Data Integration with 3 reviews while SAP Process Orchestration is ranked 1st in Business-to-Business Middleware with 28 reviews. Informatica Data Integration Hub is rated 8.0, while SAP Process Orchestration is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Informatica Data Integration Hub writes "Excellent at standardizing mass data and capable of integrating with multiple solutions ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP Process Orchestration writes "A tool that can be useful for small integrations and large integrations". Informatica Data Integration Hub is most compared with Informatica PowerCenter, AWS Database Migration Service, Azure Data Factory, Mule Anypoint Platform and SAP Data Hub, whereas SAP Process Orchestration is most compared with Mule Anypoint Platform, SAP Data Services, webMethods Integration Server, IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services and IBM B2B Integrator.
We monitor all Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.