We performed a comparison between GTB Technologies Inspector and Zscaler DLP based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Data Loss Prevention (DLP) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."This solution helps classify what is confidential and what is not, allowing products to be installed at home if they do not contain confidential information."
"The main thing that I like about GTB is that it has a single agent for DLP and data classification. You can use the same agent. In terms of licensing too, it has a single license. When it comes to data classification, it supports open-source document platforms such as ChainSoft and OpenOffice."
"They have a fingerprint feature that is very awesome. OCR is very awesome to have too."
"I am impressed with the tool's ease of deployment."
"The product has a centralized console for everything."
"The classifications in place are very helpful in making policies for ensuring sensitive data can be contained."
"The most valuable feature is we can develop what we want. If we have an old or new requirement, they are able to support us to develop it all within one month."
"The policies are very easy to implement."
"The UI is easy to use."
"It is a very scalable solution. Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."
"The customer service and support are very good."
"Its impressive scalability allows the combination of multiple dictionaries and using them as one engine, resulting in narrower data loss gaps."
"The most valuable aspect of Zscaler Cloud DLP is its automatic DLP feature."
"The initial setup is easy."
"You can close your data protection gaps with Zscaler. You can quickly find all the classified, sensitive data across the cloud."
"To stay competitive, they should expand to smartphones."
"The performance could be better."
"They have a roadmap for the Linux platform and Mac as well, and in the next quarter, they might have patch management also for Windows. However, they don't have that much for Linux and Mac. So, we need those things in Linux and Mac as well."
"The product needs to improve its support so that users can just log in and create tickets as opposed to sending emails. Sending emails is difficult to track. It also needs to work on its analytics platform."
"The solution could improve by providing additional availability requirements."
"The solution’s performance must be improved."
"It would be great if they have information rights management (IRM) on the same agent."
"Another area of improvement is implementation through non-client connectors. The solution can be implemented in two ways. One uses the back file; the other one uses client connectors. So the client connector is pretty fast, but when it comes to non-client connectors and procedures, it's kind of delayed and slow."
"The tool must provide IP-blocking features."
"We have issues with the tool's maintenance and networking. It should be able to work in offline mode as well."
"There aren't really any missing features that I have witnessed."
"The product must allow users to check logs for an entire year in the local console."
"On the improvement side, when we bypass certain internet traffic types, it's currently recommended to have a one-click option, but audio and video aren't always supported. Thus, we need to bypass that kind of traffic. So, it is an area of improvement."
"Zscaler Cloud DLP needs to improve its compatibility with other security tools."
"They should work on a replica account. There could be alerts and replica files sent to the DLP team during data collection."
GTB Technologies Inspector is ranked 16th in Data Loss Prevention (DLP) with 7 reviews while Zscaler DLP is ranked 4th in Data Loss Prevention (DLP) with 15 reviews. GTB Technologies Inspector is rated 8.2, while Zscaler DLP is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of GTB Technologies Inspector writes "Good policy creation and data protection but needs better performance". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Zscaler DLP writes "Provides a range of security measures to protect network traffic". GTB Technologies Inspector is most compared with Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention, Symantec Data Loss Prevention, Varonis Platform, Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention and CoSoSys Endpoint Protector, whereas Zscaler DLP is most compared with Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention, Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention, Symantec Data Loss Prevention, Varonis Platform and CoSoSys Endpoint Protector. See our GTB Technologies Inspector vs. Zscaler DLP report.
See our list of best Data Loss Prevention (DLP) vendors.
We monitor all Data Loss Prevention (DLP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
