We performed a comparison between GitHub CoPilot and Pega BPM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Rapid Application Development Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Initially, OpenAI is free, but you'll need to pay for it later."
"The product's initial setup is straightforward because it's pushed through the updates."
"The document generation features are valuable."
"The initial setup of the product is easy."
"The product's most valuable feature is vulnerability management features."
"The product is easy to integrate."
"GitHub CoPilot accelerates productivity. It is an easy-to-use solution that is also helpful in saving the team's time."
"When I write code, I feel like I have someone sitting with me to help me. Wherever I'm stuck, I just ask a question, and it provides guidance that I can use."
"It is a stable product."
"The workflows are the most valuable features, particularly for us, because we were attempting to automate processes by utilizing workflows to provide a hands-off comparison between the bot and the human."
"The most important features of Pega BPM are case management and claims management, and soon they'll also be offering claims processing. I also love Pega BPM in terms of performance. It's also one of the very few user-friendly solutions in the market. It may take some time to learn Pega BPM, but once you get a proper handle on it, tracking and managing processes become very easy anytime, anywhere. Pega BPM also has very good documentation you can use to learn the solution. Pega has a community portal that has complete information and explanations, and if you're facing a challenge, you can post your challenge on the community portal and get a resolution at the same time."
"The solution's case management is its most valuable aspect."
"When our clients automate the KYC and onboarding processes, they can reduce their manual force and then deploy them in much better tasks rather than the mundane activities of selecting forms and gathering information."
"Can do a lot of things with minimum time and cost."
"There are a lot of frameworks in the product. I use Pega PRPC the most."
"Pricing is a little on the high side."
"In certain instances, OpenAI didn't respond in the expected way. The responses were more general and didn't address the specific point."
"The solution is expensive. It should also support other programming languages."
"The product's price is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"GitHub CoPilot’s integration with other solutions could be improved."
"In a few cases, the results aren't correct, so that needs improvement. Also, it would be great if the results could be presented in different formats, not just text. As engineers, it takes time to read through text-based results."
"Some of the suggestions provided by GitHub CoPilot are not accurate, making it an area of concern where improvements are required."
"The suggestions provided by the product must be improved."
"GitHub CoPilot's stability is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"The workflow automation can be slow, so there is room for improvement there."
"We need more light retail BPM tools within the Pega system. However, Pega is mostly for big companies."
"It is scalable, but it also interacts with a lot of other systems. I think they thought that the interface to other systems, legacy systems, was its strength, but when problems do occur, quickly diagnosing those problems has been a challenge."
"We have experienced a few technical challenges, particularly triggering the workflow through file drops and accessing files."
"Pega Cloud early adoption and use for cross enterprise capability was new to many. The early adoption meant version 2.0 of their cloud service may require refactoring and redesign of some services."
"There is a scarcity of resources who have worked with this solution before."
"Pega BPM's documentation should be improved, especially for freshers or new trainees."
"Pega BPM could be improved by including token-based authentication and extending its integration options."
GitHub CoPilot is ranked 15th in Rapid Application Development Software with 10 reviews while Pega BPM is ranked 7th in Rapid Application Development Software with 55 reviews. GitHub CoPilot is rated 8.4, while Pega BPM is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of GitHub CoPilot writes "Though it offers good integration features, the price needs to be lowered". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Pega BPM writes "Low code with great APIs and good flexibility". GitHub CoPilot is most compared with GitLab, Oracle Application Express (APEX), ServiceNow, Mendix and OutSystems, whereas Pega BPM is most compared with ServiceNow, Camunda, Appian, Microsoft Power Apps and Microsoft Azure App Service. See our GitHub CoPilot vs. Pega BPM report.
See our list of best Rapid Application Development Software vendors.
We monitor all Rapid Application Development Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
