We performed a comparison between F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM), OpenVPN Access Server, and Safe-T Secure Application Access based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about F5, Citrix, HAProxy and others in Application Delivery Controllers (ADC)."Great load balancing."
"It is stable."
"The most valuable feature is the proxy."
"iRules are very valuable. In addition to that, the way profiles are depicted by the LTM is also very good."
"Where we are finding the AWS version helpful is when we are trying to scale up new environments. AWS Marketplace helps here a lot."
"The combination of ADC and WAN is the most valuable feature."
"It improves the overall performance of applications by decreasing the burden on servers associated with managing and maintaining applications and network sessions, as well as by performing application-specific tasks."
"We are fond of the load balancing feature for DNS and servers."
"Security is the most valuable feature."
"The product provides secure internet connections and helps with faster downloads."
"I have found the stability to be good."
"It can scale well."
"The product has strong encryption and scalability features. It provides security for private network connections."
"It is very easy to look at the quality of the connection and the bandwidth and do an investigation if there are problems on the network."
"The solution is user-friendly and easy to implement."
"It can securely do remote product updates... just as if it was on our LAN."
"the security level is very high. After we tested it and checked all the security aspects of the product, we found that it's highly secure."
"Safe-T is very good for users because it has plug-in for Outlook."
"If you want a very flexible system that you can easily integrate, and develop interfaces for it or plug-ins to other application environments, it's probably the most flexible"
"It's easy to use over the web. A user who is not in the office can use it and securely insert files."
"There is a challenge in Pakistan. This is when there is a hardware failure. Sometimes, it takes more time to get a replacement because it is sent out from the U.S. or some other regional outpost. Thus, it takes two to three days to receive a replacement."
"There is a need for a more modular version to concentrate on the current monolithic structure of both the virtual and hardware versions."
"An expensive solution for the minimal features we use."
"The deployment could be simplified."
"I used GitHub for autoscaling CloudFormation, and I found two bugs and I submitted them. Their implementation in GitHub could be cleaner and allow for a bit more customization."
"Fixing bugs."
"The auto logout feature after three minutes is terrible. I wish they would make that longer, since it is not a feature that we can change."
"This is a very expensive solution."
"OpenVPN Access Server needs to have fewer updates."
"I'd like the solution to have more access points and more speed."
"I would like to see continued advanced security implementation."
"It could include a configuration wizard so that users who do not follow instructions well can configure a connection."
"This solution should improve the connection speed and the user interface. The stability of this solution should be improved as well."
"I want the tool to be faster. We have experienced connectivity issues while using OpenVPN and FortiClient."
"Needs a better GUI."
"The stability had room for improvement."
"One important thing that we haven't found in this product is the ability to provide a read-only view for documents. Also, the ability for the customer to add annotations to these documents."
"The Outlook agent is not working well for installing it in the entire office."
More F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
