We performed a comparison between Checkmarx One, F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM), and Fortinet FortiDDoS based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Sonar, Veracode, Checkmarx and others in Application Security Tools."The most valuable feature of Checkmarx is the user interface, it is very easy to use. We do not need to configure anything, we only have to scan to see the results."
"It gives the proper code flow of vulnerabilities and the number of occurrences."
"Less false positive errors as compared to any other solution."
"The administration in Checkmarx is very good."
"It allows for SAST scanning of uncompiled code. Further, it natively integrates with all key repos formats (Git, TFS, SVN, Perforce, etc)."
"The identification of verification-related security vulnerabilities is really important and one of the key things. It also identifies vulnerabilities for any kind of third-party tool coming into the system or any third-party tools that you are using, which is very useful for avoiding random hacking."
"Compared to the solutions we used previously, Checkmarx has reduced our workload by almost 75%."
"The solution allows us to create custom rules for code checks."
"The occasion in which we needed technical support, we didn't have problems with them, because they always answered our questions without any trouble."
"It is a scalable solution."
"It integrates with AWS WAF, which makes it easy to deploy without changes to your infrastructure."
"It has so many features. First of all, it has a full proxy architecture, it has multiple modules. The best feature is the WAF, the web application firewall module. It also has cashing type capabilities. It has all kinds of load-balancing algorithms based on your IT requirements."
"The main reason that we suggest this product to our clients is the great integration with other security tools, such as IBM Guardium."
"The configuration and integration into the AWS environment was pretty easy."
"The solution has good load balancing capabilities."
"Bandwidth optimization and capacity awareness of the bandwidth are valuable features. Its video streaming capabilities are also very useful."
"I find the interface easy to use."
"This solution can protect Layer 3, Layer 4 and Layer 7 attacks of applications for us."
"It allows me to see all the traffic on my network."
"The product's initial setup phase was really easy."
"It is a user-friendly product in terms of monitoring and updating policies."
"The product allows the users to adjust the thresholds."
"The solution is very user-friendly and very easy to use."
"The most valuable feature is the cloud DDoS scrubbing capability."
"Checkmarx could improve the speed of the scans."
"I really would like to integrate it as a service along with the SAP HANA Cloud Platform. It will then be easy to use it directly as a service."
"The cost per user is high and should be reduced."
"Checkmarx could be improved with more integration with third-party software."
"I would like to see the rate of false positives reduced."
"You can't use it in the continuous delivery pipeline because the scanning takes too much time."
"As the solution becomes more complex and feature rich, it takes more time to debug and resolve problems. Feature-wise, we have no complaints, but Checkmarx becomes harder to maintain as the product becomes more complex. When I talk to support, it takes them longer to fix the problem than it used to."
"They could work to improve the user interface. Right now, it really is lacking."
"Initial setup is tricky, if you do not understand the design of this product."
"Security and Reporting."
"Certificate management needs improvement. I would like automated deployment of new certificates without manual intervention to be in the next release of this product."
"My only point of contention would be that it is a little pricey."
"I would like to see improvement in the manageability and easier setup."
"They need to improve the interface and some of the functionalities."
"Reporting could be improved and configuration made easier."
"If we decide to migrate to the cloud, I don't think that BIG-IP is a good solution and we probably won't use it."
"Alerts and reporting features must be improved."
"The only thing they need to do is to automate it. Today, you must create tools that do not require the use of an expert or anyone with special skills."
"The product’s pricing needs improvement."
"The web interface could be much better."
"All the thresholds that need to be configured should be included in the default so that user will not forget or misconfigure."
"The primary area for improvement is the on-premises capacity limit, currently fixed at 10 GB."
"I find that there have been issues in the past year with the solution hanging. It freezes often."
"I would like to see analytics, big data."
More F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) Pricing and Cost Advice →
