We performed a comparison between Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration and Clearswift SECURE Email Gateway based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Email Security solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."There are several features that I consider valuable."
"At the moment we are satisfied with this product. It's a stable, scalable, and resilient solution for us."
"I would say that 90% of the spam and phishing attack emails get blocked right off the bat."
"Threat Explorer is an invaluable tool for me, and it plays a crucial role in helping me discern the origins of various email campaigns, pinpointing where they emanate from, and identifying the individuals within our organization who are affected."
"The good part is that you don't have to configure it, which is very convenient."
"The solution is very easy to use. All you have to do is to assign the license to the end-user and it's done. The customer will only have the feature activated, and the solution will monitor the emails to determine if they are a threat or not."
"Microsoft Defender for Office 365 helps people to work remotely. It is a secure solution. We don't need to use our company's computers or get VPN connections to the networks. I can control how they share screens and what they send to the devices. It keeps our organizations confidential and sensitive information safe."
"The initial setup was easy."
"Based on domain and URL reputation, it will allow traffic to flow."
"Its analysis or emulation in the review of each file using the cloud and Check Point helps make each interaction via email more secure."
"It fully protects colleagues from visiting insecure sites and browsing in unhealthy environments."
"It's very easy to use, and the onboarding process is straightforward."
"For Threat Prevention, I was impressed with this feature and the solution's effectiveness. It has been very good."
"It provides visibility of events, what's going on with the environment, what we're missing with our other solution, and the user behavior."
"This DLP is very useful, as it gives our users additional protection."
"Email security has improved since we deployed this platform."
"A stable solution."
"Ability to create your own content-filtering policies with relative ease."
"The product must provide better malware detection."
"In one of the reports I can get the exact place where a vulnerable file resides. But for that, I need to explicitly go into the device and check. If they could include that file part in the report, without my having to go to the device itself, that would help."
"Microsoft sometimes has downtime, and we'll get several incidents coming in back to back. We have a huge backlog of notifications, many of which may be false positives. However, there might be serious alerts, so we can't risk dismissing all of them at once."
"They can improve their security in a way where a customer can know if all their attachments are safe or not to open through a report. The solution does its job perfectly, but it never reports to the customer whether those attachments have been stopped before or not."
"Microsoft Defender for Office 365 should be more proactive."
"Microsoft Defender for Office 365 must improve the overall management style, including the GUI. It also needs to change the filters so that it is easy to whitelist and blacklist data."
"You should be able to deploy Defender for every subscription without the need to add servers."
"The pre-sales cost calculations could be more transparent."
"Cloud Guard would be a complete solution if Check Point added a comprehensive data loss solution that included capabilities such as bulk data transfer detection."
"They could improve Check Point support response times. Sometimes it takes days to resolve or even days to get a first response."
"The left-hand feature can be made more granular for the implementation of the policy."
"The next release should focus more on email categorization and provide options for unlocking blocked safe emails."
"I need to go to Check Point's admin portal if I want to see the license list and the details of the users of the tool, making it an area of concern where some ease of process should be provided from an improvement perspective."
"Check Point could improve its marketing strategy."
"Check Point needs to address the pricing segment for SMEs."
"Harmony Email & Collaboration could be improved by making the whitelist available on the website and application level."
"FTP server and TRUST Manager functionality."
"Malware needs improvement."
More Microsoft Defender for Office 365 Pricing and Cost Advice →
More Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration is ranked 7th in Email Security with 49 reviews while Clearswift SECURE Email Gateway is ranked 38th in Email Security. Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration is rated 8.6, while Clearswift SECURE Email Gateway is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration writes "Has a user-friendly dashboard, a great anti-phishing algorithm, and sandboxing for testing". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Clearswift SECURE Email Gateway writes "Facilitates creation of your own content-filtering policies with relative ease". Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration is most compared with Avanan, Microsoft Defender for Cloud, Mimecast Email Security, Cisco Secure Email and Barracuda Email Protection, whereas Clearswift SECURE Email Gateway is most compared with Microsoft Exchange Online Protection (EOP), Mimecast Email Security, Cisco Secure Email, Proofpoint Email Protection and Fortinet FortiMail. See our Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration vs. Clearswift SECURE Email Gateway report.
See our list of best Email Security vendors.
We monitor all Email Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.