We performed a comparison between Boomi AtomSphere Integration and Tungsten RPA based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The product's integration features are quite rich and low code. It is easy to use."
"It's very user-friendly and designed to be easy to use for the end user."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is its monitoring part to debug certain issues and find problems."
"The connection configuration part and the drag-and-drop integration module are the most valuable features for me."
"The solution has a lot of connectors, which is quite helpful."
"Boomi AtomSphere Integration is stable."
"I like the tool's optimization feature."
"AtomSphere Integration will suit those looking for small automation and simple integrations."
"This is a stable platform and we did not encounter any big problems."
"The flexibility to use already-developed components is really good. You can use it for Excel-related operations and other things."
"The solution is scalable."
"The ability to script information from websites is most valuable. It also seems to be fairly robust and reasonably easy to manage on a server-based deployment. We have a number of robots operating on the central server."
"The most valuable features are workflow and process automation."
"You can automate browsing tasks without needing a server connection. The platform provides its browser, allowing you to run anything inside it."
"The OCR was quite stable and flexible."
"The product provides end-to-end solutions for different business problems."
"In my experience, I haven't encountered any major issues with the tool. However, there could be a learning curve for new users, especially depending on which tool you're using. For example, I've used MuleSoft in the past, which is more code-oriented and requires knowledge of Java. Transitioning to Boomi AtomSphere Integration took me a couple of months because of differences in terminology."
"They need to introduce more configurable functions to remove scripting or coding. Scripting should be minimized. It should have exhaustive functions. Currently, it lacks in this aspect."
"Lots of enhancements are needed in the API portal so that the developers can view the definitions, try out the APIs, etc."
"There should be more scripting possibilities."
"The API can use some work to come up to speed with the competition but Dell has plans and is working on resolving that."
"The solution is complex. There's a few items and features that are hard to understand. They should work to simplify the functionality so new users don't struggle."
"In day-to-day operations, tracking transactions is a major challenge. It takes hours to track a single transaction. It is not a straightforward process."
"Have to create some of our own pre-built connectors."
"I'd like to see a recording function and a more simple interface."
"The product should improve desktop automation, which is hard to configure. It needs to have custom connectors. It is the only advantage that Microsoft Power Platform has over Kofax RPA. It has more than 800 custom connectors."
"The solution needs to be scalable."
"The solution could use some AI integrated features."
"Automation with the latest websites is not effective. The support of newer websites developed using new technologies would improve this solution."
"Kofax RPA's UI could be more user-friendly."
"The product needs more AI capabilities."
"Kofax RPA needs to improve integration with SAP and Microsoft. The professional services offered by the tool's team is below par. Its licensing needs to be more modular."
Boomi AtomSphere Integration is ranked 5th in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) with 25 reviews while Tungsten RPA is ranked 12th in Robotic Process Automation (RPA) with 24 reviews. Boomi AtomSphere Integration is rated 7.8, while Tungsten RPA is rated 7.4. The top reviewer of Boomi AtomSphere Integration writes "Stable product, suitable for limited integrations and lacks flexibility ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tungsten RPA writes "A stable product that provides end-to-end solutions for different business problems". Boomi AtomSphere Integration is most compared with Microsoft Azure Logic Apps, webMethods Integration Server, SSIS, Oracle Integration Cloud Service and Talend Open Studio, whereas Tungsten RPA is most compared with UiPath, Microsoft Power Automate, Blue Prism, Automation Anywhere (AA) and Azure Data Factory. See our Boomi AtomSphere Integration vs. Tungsten RPA report.
We monitor all Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
