We performed a comparison between Boomi AtomSphere Integration, Informatica Cloud Data Integration, and Informatica PowerCenter based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about MuleSoft, Microsoft, Oracle and others in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)."It's very user-friendly and designed to be easy to use for the end user."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is its monitoring part to debug certain issues and find problems."
"The best features are that it is a cloud-based and a multi-tenant tool."
"AtomSphere Integration will suit those looking for small automation and simple integrations."
"The product's integration features are quite rich and low code. It is easy to use."
"The connection configuration part and the drag-and-drop integration module are the most valuable features for me."
"The solution has a lot of connectors, which is quite helpful."
"The iPaaS functionality is very mature. The browser based IDE is also very mature and stable."
"The mass ingestion functionality and the elasticity of the solution are great."
"The most valuable feature of Informatica Cloud Data Integration is Pushback. You are able to push the data to the solution itself, and it can handle the queries. It helps us a lot. With other tools, the burden is kept on the server."
"It has become an easy way to exchange information through any cloud application."
"The most valuable features of Informatica Cloud Data Integration for our clients are the AI capabilities within Informatica Intelligent Cloud Services."
"I do a quite a lot of data transformations, and the fact that I can do them without changing any of my SQL queries from the code, using the inbuilt tools, is very helpful."
"The Mapping Designer allows for declarative ETL development (visual scripting) that leverages a wide array of different transformations."
"It is a scalable solution. Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a nine out of ten."
"The support is very good."
"It is UI friendly and has all the advantages of an ETL tool."
"Good interface, reasonable documentation."
"I like the completeness of the way I can build ETL workflows."
"It has good standard features for ETL development."
"Informatica PowerCenter has good user feedback. The developers can easily make mappings in the solution."
"Reusable definition of data sources and the out-of-the-box availability of a large number maplets for common transformation functions."
"It works with any multi-databases, so it works with Sybase, SQL Server. Also, the performance is really good and it is easy to use."
"I like the automated scheduling feature."
"Lots of enhancements are needed in the API portal so that the developers can view the definitions, try out the APIs, etc."
"The product's UI could be more convenient."
"It is a costly platform. Its pricing could be better."
"In my experience, I haven't encountered any major issues with the tool. However, there could be a learning curve for new users, especially depending on which tool you're using. For example, I've used MuleSoft in the past, which is more code-oriented and requires knowledge of Java. Transitioning to Boomi AtomSphere Integration took me a couple of months because of differences in terminology."
"There should be more scripting possibilities."
"In day-to-day operations, tracking transactions is a major challenge. It takes hours to track a single transaction. It is not a straightforward process."
"Boomi AtomSphere Integration should scale up on the migration area."
"It crashes if we run high-volume integration."
"There are a small number of UI bugs that occur on occasion."
"I would like to see more functionality added so that it is a bit closer to how much you can do with Informatica PowerCenter."
"The regions in which the data resides are still limited. This could be an issue in terms of the data residency laws of some of the countries. They should get more regions."
"Informatica Cloud Data Integration could improve the price by making it less expensive."
"The vendor should have more training resources: online classes, free tutorial videos, etc."
"I would like to see support for more data sources."
"The main issue preventing Brazilian companies from migrating to Informatica Cloud Data Integration from on-prem is the price."
"Cost-wise, it could be better."
"The documentation could be improved."
"The UI is a little outdated."
"Now they are migrating to a new version, and they have something that is called Informatica Developer. Previously, they just had PowerCenter. Now, when they move everything to Informatica Developer it's not as good or stable like it was when it was PowerCenter, though it has some nice features. This Developer tool could be better."
"They should release new versions for the solution's on-premises setup."
"The UI is outdated and old-fashioned, at least in our current version. Also, we have experienced some stability issues with the Workflow Monitor application."
"This solution needs the functionality to do batch processing of data. It also lacks connectivity to NoSQL, unstructured data sources."
"The price of the product is an area of concern where improvements are required, considering the fact that the present licensing charges of the tool are expensive."
"It would be better if I could do all the work within a single window. If I'm working on any mapping and if I have to switch to sessions, I have to open a new window altogether. If I have to get into workflows, I have to open a new window. It was also very expensive. In the next release, I would like it to be more user-friendly."
More Informatica Cloud Data Integration Pricing and Cost Advice →