We performed a comparison between Azure Monitor and Cavisson NetDiagnostics based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, New Relic and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability."The solution very easily integrates with Azure services and in one click you can monitor your resource."
"The most valuable feature is the universality of their functionalities in all Azure services, including, software solutions."
"I am monitoring all of my Azure Monitor and getting good reports. I can customize the reports to get the information I need. I am also getting emails about which AAS instances are down and everything in the system related to my services. It is easy to use, scalable, and user-friendly. Microsoft has Many guides and videos to help you understand how to create and use Azure Monitor."
"The solution has tons of valuable features."
"The solution is quite stable."
"Azure Monitor gives us the observability to check everything that we have in the cloud."
"Technical support is helpful."
"Log analytics and log queries are the most valuable features of Azure Monitor."
"Its end-to-end dashboard provides information on all the integration callouts happening on the server side."
"n comparison to New Relic, which I've used before, it's a bit more complicated. It's not as easy to use. It also took some time to get it working. The implementation needs to be simpler."
"The biggest one is probably just the user interface. There could be more advanced logging at the database level. They can also improve their query builder to allow you to search for things better, but I last used it about a year ago. They might have already changed a ton of things in the newer versions."
"Azure Monitor could improve the visualization aspect and integrate better with other third-party services."
"They need to work on a more hybrid deployment that will allow us to monitor local on-premise deployments and connect to different systems. I would like to see more integration."
"The price could be lower but it is not a must."
"They need to work with other cloud providers - not just Azure."
"have used multiple products like Webex and PRTG. Some features could be added. Azure Monitor should add SMS and APIs. We have very limited access to Azure Monitor. I usually get alerts on my phone when they are integrated with Slack. I am not always available, but my team is. Sometimes, I am traveling and don't have access to my email, but I have Slack and other third-party projects that send me instant messages if a sensor goes down."
"In my opinion, they should improve the overall user experience, especially when it comes to indexing and searching collective logs."
"They can improve on providing "help and navigation" for each feature available in the UI."
Earn 20 points
Azure Monitor is ranked 4th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 44 reviews while Cavisson NetDiagnostics is ranked 87th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability. Azure Monitor is rated 7.6, while Cavisson NetDiagnostics is rated 10.0. The top reviewer of Azure Monitor writes "A powerful Kusto query language but the alerting mechanism needs improvement". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Cavisson NetDiagnostics writes "Improves our application at the code level because of its different performance metrics". Azure Monitor is most compared with Datadog, Dynatrace, Prometheus, Sentry and Grafana, whereas Cavisson NetDiagnostics is most compared with .
See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.
We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.