We performed a comparison between Azure Monitor and CA Application Delivery Analysis [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, New Relic and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability."I am impressed by the reporting on the average eight ports that we get from this solution."
"The tool's most valuable feature is the alert system, which can be set according to our metrics. The integration is smooth."
"The dashboard allows us to easily track various metrics and quickly understand the overall health of our system."
"The solution very easily integrates with Azure services and in one click you can monitor your resource."
"I am monitoring all of my Azure Monitor and getting good reports. I can customize the reports to get the information I need. I am also getting emails about which AAS instances are down and everything in the system related to my services. It is easy to use, scalable, and user-friendly. Microsoft has Many guides and videos to help you understand how to create and use Azure Monitor."
"Azure Monitor gives us the observability to check everything that we have in the cloud."
"Log analytics and log queries are the most valuable features of Azure Monitor."
"One of the most useful aspects of this solution is the out-of-the-box functionality on all areas, especially on Application Insights, zero instrumentation, and artificial intelligence for event correlation."
"The pricing is relatively low compared to other solutions in this area. I'd go so far as to say it's even significantly less than the competition."
"The most valuable feature is the fault management monitoring."
"Enhancing and reaching a level of detail that facilitates pinpointing and addressing issues at such a refined level within the application and database components would be helpful."
"n comparison to New Relic, which I've used before, it's a bit more complicated. It's not as easy to use. It also took some time to get it working. The implementation needs to be simpler."
"In my opinion, they should improve the overall user experience, especially when it comes to indexing and searching collective logs."
"I'd like the solution to do more around vulnerability assessment. It's lacking in the product right now."
"This solution could be improved with more out-of-the-box functionalities and artificial intelligence to complete event correlation."
"The default interface should be improved."
"If it is configured incorrectly, you can end up with a huge bill."
"Currently, it seems it's complicated to get the correct information in terms of what to do and how things work."
"My biggest complaint about ADA is that you have to rely on dedicated appliances."
"The user interface needs improvement."
More CA Application Delivery Analysis [EOL] Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
Azure Monitor is ranked 4th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 44 reviews while CA Application Delivery Analysis [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability. Azure Monitor is rated 7.6, while CA Application Delivery Analysis [EOL] is rated 6.6. The top reviewer of Azure Monitor writes "A powerful Kusto query language but the alerting mechanism needs improvement". On the other hand, the top reviewer of CA Application Delivery Analysis [EOL] writes "Impressive ability to show potential slow downs. ". Azure Monitor is most compared with Datadog, Dynatrace, Sentry, Prometheus and Grafana, whereas CA Application Delivery Analysis [EOL] is most compared with .
See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.
We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.