We performed a comparison between Azure Backup and ManageEngine Recovery Manager Plus based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Veeam Software, Zerto, Commvault and others in Backup and Recovery."The product is very reliable and easy to use."
"I like that it's a stable solution and their support is good. I think Microsoft's commercial force is superior."
"When it comes to Azure Backup, the advantage is that it's native and it's very easy to configure. We don't require a separate tool or manage something on a separate server. At the backend, it's managed by Microsoft itself, and we don't need to manage it."
"The initial setup was very easy."
"With a couple of buttons, we can configure a VM for a backup and use the wall service, the storage wall service, pretty seamlessly."
"I like that it's a simple system."
"It is a stable solution...It is a highly scalable solution."
"This solution allows me to restore either the VM or the data, depending on what is needed."
"Along with its active directory infrastructure, this solution also possesses the ability to recover and exchange, making it a valuable backup tool."
"I would like to see better pricing."
"Technical support is in need of improvement."
"I would like to have the option to increase the frequency of the backups. Azure Backup does backups on an hourly basis, but I would prefer it to take backups more often."
"Lacks an AI system that would enable easier upgrading of the hardware."
"My company faces a lot of difficulties in restoring any encrypted VM backup."
"Azure Backup's licensing model is very challenging because it doesn't give a clear picture."
"In Avamar, the file-based restores are very quick and fast, whereas, in Azure Backup, VM restore is super easy, but if I have to do a file or a folder restore, I have to mount the entire VM image. I have to wait for some time for it to be mounted, and then I have to go inside and then check the file and copy it somewhere. It's a bit of a manual process, whereas in Avamar, you can directly select a file and folder, and it'll recover with whatever permissions you want."
"Ransomware protection is missing in Azure Backup."
"The solution has few features as it does not focus on managing anything in the application."
More ManageEngine Recovery Manager Plus Pricing and Cost Advice →
Azure Backup is ranked 9th in Backup and Recovery with 51 reviews while ManageEngine Recovery Manager Plus is ranked 5th in Active Directory Recovery with 1 review. Azure Backup is rated 7.8, while ManageEngine Recovery Manager Plus is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Azure Backup writes "Straightforward to set up and manage and allows us to monitor all backups in one place". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ManageEngine Recovery Manager Plus writes "Though this tool lacks the features to allow backups on the same server, it is very easy to use". Azure Backup is most compared with Veeam Backup & Replication, Rubrik, Commvault Cloud, Acronis Cyber Protect and Veritas NetBackup, whereas ManageEngine Recovery Manager Plus is most compared with Veeam Backup & Replication, Semperis Active Directory Forest Recovery (ADFR), Quest Recovery Manager for Active Directory Disaster Recovery Edition and Rubrik.
We monitor all Backup and Recovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.