Atmos [EOL] vs Citrix ShareFile comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Dell Technologies Logo
views| comparisons
50% willing to recommend
Citrix Logo
2,326 views|1,911 comparisons
90% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Atmos [EOL] and Citrix ShareFile based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about NetApp, Google, Nasuni and others in Cloud Storage.
To learn more, read our detailed Cloud Storage Report (Updated: April 2024).
769,789 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"This is a scalable solution that can handle petabytes of information and millions of stored objects at multiple locations."

More Atmos [EOL] Pros →

"This provides us with a secure way of sending tax returns without having to use passwords.""The Enterprise Dropbox solution is highly integrated with Microsoft's Office 365 and Azure products.""Citrix has a very good file auditing features and security features.""ShareFile gives you all of the features of cloud providers, but in an on-premises solution.""The solution is scalable.""The solution would query the Active Directory, and if new accounts were identified, Citrix ShareFile would add them automatically.""It's user-friendly for end users.""Easy to manage and fully secure."

More Citrix ShareFile Pros →

Cons
"Our clients need the flexibility to easily move from Atmos to AWS and GCP and then back from GCP to AWS to Atmos."

More Atmos [EOL] Cons →

"Some of our customers are facing issues if they've deployed in hybrid mode.""The configuration on the mobile devices is a little clunky, in terms of setting up the application.""My only issue with this solution is the cost, which should be improved.""There are sometimes scalability issues after updates.""They should integrate the solution with more email services.""DLP features are lacking and required because, especially with everyone working from home, security is now paramount when the data is on BYOD devices.""Everything they have should be integrated into one item.""The user interface is not very intuitive."

More Citrix ShareFile Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "You have to work hard in order to get the suitable licenses."
  • "If you are already a Citrix customer, I recommend having the Platinum licensing level, as it provides licensing for a number of various features that all integrate together."
  • "Citrix has a very good file auditing features and security features."
  • "I give the cost of the solution a five out of five."
  • More Citrix ShareFile Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Storage solutions are best for your needs.
    769,789 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Top Answer:They should integrate the solution with more email services. That would be very helpful.
    Top Answer:We use the solution primarily for sending and receiving encrypted files. It helps us share large files as well.
    Ranking
    Unranked
    In Cloud Storage
    Views
    2,326
    Comparisons
    1,911
    Reviews
    3
    Average Words per Review
    891
    Rating
    8.7
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Atmos
    ShareFile
    Learn More
    Overview

    EMC Atmos is an object-based cloud storage platform to store, archive and access unstructured content at scale. Atmos provides the essential building blocks for enterprises and service providers to transform to private, hybrid, and public cloud storage.

    ShareFile is a secure file sync and sharing service that meets the mobility and collaboration needs of users and the security requirements of businesses.
    Sample Customers
    PEER1 Hosting, University of Illinois Hospital, Muzak Holdings
    Exelon, Aer Lingus, Aloysius Stichting, Amnet Technology Solutions, Arup Group Ltd., Brasfield and Gorrie, Cancer Research UK, Carlock, Copeland & Stair LLC, ChanceLightŽ Behavioral Health & Education
    Top Industries
    No Data Available
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company13%
    Legal Firm9%
    Financial Services Firm9%
    Construction Company8%
    Company Size
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business40%
    Midsize Enterprise30%
    Large Enterprise30%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business38%
    Midsize Enterprise16%
    Large Enterprise46%
    Buyer's Guide
    Cloud Storage
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about NetApp, Google, Nasuni and others in Cloud Storage. Updated: April 2024.
    769,789 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Atmos [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Cloud Storage while Citrix ShareFile is ranked 9th in Content Collaboration Platforms with 11 reviews. Atmos [EOL] is rated 8.0, while Citrix ShareFile is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Atmos [EOL] writes "Flexible in deployment, scalable, and the technical support is good". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Citrix ShareFile writes "Flexible plans, stable, and scalable". Atmos [EOL] is most compared with , whereas Citrix ShareFile is most compared with SharePoint, Dropbox, Box, Microsoft OneDrive and Office 365.

    We monitor all Cloud Storage reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.