We performed a comparison between Array AG Series, Citrix Gateway, and F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, Citrix, Ivanti and others in SSL VPN."What I appreciate most about the Array AG Series, and what our clients value as well, is its exceptional stability."
"For our use case, it was scalable. There were at least 25 end users using this solution from remote locations. And once the connection was established, there weren't any complaints."
"Providing our organization the ability to work remotely was the most valuable feature of Citrix Gateway. I also enjoy that they are always adding features."
"The initial setup is simple."
"It is easy to set up and is stable. It is scalable as well, depending on the model."
"The product enables us to collect logs from the systems."
"We haven't received any complaints or performance issues so far."
"Provides good performance and speed."
"The product is straightforward."
"F5 Big-IP Local Traffic Manager has better modular features especially LTM, which according to the clients, is very beneficial. Most of the users opt for a combination of big IP LTM and WAF which helps them to leverage application load balancing and enhance application security many-fold."
"The most valuable features are the WAF and the big IP."
"It supports APIs and virtual additions for cloud and VMware."
"The main reason that we suggest this product to our clients is the great integration with other security tools, such as IBM Guardium."
"The solution is robust and reliable."
"This is a solution that does what it's supposed to do at the price point."
"NetFlow balancing and traffic balancing are good features."
"The most valuable feature I found is iRules."
"The main area for improvement with Array AG Series is its support services."
"The initial setup is very complex."
"As an organization, our initiative is to move to the cloud, Citrix Gateway needs to improve its cloud capabilities and make the cloud solution more robust."
"Lacks access through a mobile device."
"If there is an increase in the customer infrastructure, it is not stable."
"It would be nice if they offered easier setups and implementation wizards."
"The product should be more secure."
"The solution can be a bit pricey."
"Technical support could be improved."
"If one virtual portion is unavailable, it can cause issues."
"If they made it easier for engineers to get F5 training then it would be better."
"Internet and cloud support could be improved."
"I would like to see better integration."
"BIG-IP LTM is taking a long time to mature in cloud environments. They plan to improve cloud integration in the next version, but it isn't out yet. It's essential because more companies are moving to the cloud these days and using things like Kubernetes or microservices. F5 needs to improve in that direction, and they are."
"Technical support could be faster. It's something I'd like to see them work on in the future."
"I would like there to be more device security. I would like the tool to support SSL links, along with SSL and TLS."
"It reaches a point where scaling is no longer possible."
More F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) Pricing and Cost Advice →
