We performed a comparison between Adaptiva and CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, VMware, ManageEngine and others in UEM (Unified Endpoint Management)."For our office workers who are not based in Norway, when we order the PC, we can do some of the settings for them. These are standardized settings. We can set them up exactly as they are in Norway so that they're the same."
"The central administration con dashboard is very easy to use and provides very good oversight on all that needs to be monitored."
"Stable product that's easy to set up compared to other MDM products."
"The most valuable feature is probably mobile device management. Small businesses are coming under greater scrutiny and requirements for compliance as time goes on. We don't have to worry about a VPN because we can manage these devices, control company data, and lock users out. If needed, we can remotely wipe devices and deadman-switch them."
"The Asset Management and Auto Pilot are valuable features."
"The biggest thing for us is enforcing logins only from devices that are managed by Intune."
"I like the tool's integration with Apple. Anyone who creates an ID in Intune will get an Apple ID."
"It is user-friendly, and the performance is also good. It is a convenient product"
"Adaptiva is really good in terms of content delivery and network bandwidth optimization."
"The solution is scalable."
"Users can scale the solution."
"The password rotation and the session recording are the most valuable features."
"What sets CyberArk apart is its continuous innovation, staying ahead of the competition."
"We can do both server and endpoint protection."
"It offers great performance."
"The feature called PTA, which stands for Privileged Threat Analytics keeps track of what admins are doing and works with Centimeters. If something fishy is going on with a user's credentials, it alerts the security team so they can act fast. Plus, it automates stuff like resetting credentials or blocking users. So, if there's a potential hack, CyberArk can change passwords and lock out users in a snap. It also gives you a heads-up if anything unusual is going on with server activities, like someone creating new users with uncontrolled credentials."
"I am impressed with the product's seamless integration. The PAM wallet and enterprise password wallet are good also good."
"Data leak prevention can be integrated into it. Currently, it does not have data leak prevention."
"Intune lags all of its competitors in terms of report generation."
"I'd like some more reporting so that I don't have to delve into PowerShell and I can pull more of the local device information such as memory, apps installed, etc. It would be nice to be able to see the apps that are present there but might not be managed. For example, if they installed 7Zip, it could report that back via an installed program or feature to see what was currently installed."
"I'm still playing around with it and haven't had any issues with the product yet, but support can definitely be improved."
"It needs certificate provisioning for S/MIME purposes."
"Having a dedicated configuration server that assists in modifying the configuration service, and creating personalized structures, interfaces, and web services could enhance usability."
"In an upcoming release, I would like to see some kind of analytics report."
"For an existing customer who has an SCCM, it would need to be upgraded to an MECM first before I can introduce Microsoft Intune."
"It would be good if Adaptiva had everything on the cloud rather than having one server on-premises."
"CyberArk has some performance issues. For example, servers could not handle the solution when we first took CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager."
"The solution's pricing could be better."
"The product's threat protection and defense capabilities need enhancement."
"The product needs a streamlined user interface; improvements to the user interface can enhance user experience and make the solution more intuitive to navigate."
"CyberArk is a pretty heavy solution."
"Can be improved by allowing computers to be excluded from policies."
"Performance could be better. We have a couple of problems with CyberArk right now. One of the problems is performance in our environment. Support also takes a long time to respond. If the user already has local admin rights, then I can't collect any events in the console from this device. There are also some options in CyberArk that are not working properly, and are not helpful in this case. I can't collect any information to create a proper policy for the device. I have to investigate everything manually, or even disable the local admin from the device. I can collect the events only after this, and it's very time consuming. In my case, it's a waste of resources."
"The tool should be more user-friendly."
More CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
Adaptiva is ranked 9th in UEM (Unified Endpoint Management) with 1 review while CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is ranked 6th in Privileged Access Management (PAM) with 27 reviews. Adaptiva is rated 8.0, while CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Adaptiva writes "Really good in terms of content delivery and network bandwidth optimization". On the other hand, the top reviewer of CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager writes "Offers integrated solutions and expands its capabilities through strategic acquisitions". Adaptiva is most compared with Tanium XEM, whereas CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management, CrowdStrike Falcon, CyberArk Privileged Access Manager and Tanium.
We monitor all UEM (Unified Endpoint Management) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
