Cisco Wireless 9100 Access Points Reviews

Our main use case for Cisco Wireless 9100 Access Points is to connect users, enabling them to access Wi-Fi through the wireless access point. We use Cisco Wireless 9100 Access Points to connect the access point with our access switches. This is a standalone solution, so we do not have to configure this access point. Once it is connected to the WLC, it gets the configuration automatically. We have some sites where we connect this access point to the Cisco switches, and then users are able to connect to Wi-Fi with the help of Cisco Wireless 9100 Access Points. We are using multiple access points per floor, so for one particular floor, there will be two or three access points as per the requirement, enabling multiple users to use that.

Cisco Wireless 9100 Access Points' best feature is that it is a standalone device and we do not have to configure it. Since it is standalone and does not require manual configuration, we do not need to configure the access point manually. This is just plug and play. Once you connect the access point to the switch, it will start working. Cisco Wireless 9100 Access Points have positively impacted my organization by enabling many users to connect through the access point. The role of AI-driven insights in enhancing my IT team's troubleshooting capabilities with Cisco Wireless 9100 Access Points is that troubleshooting becomes easy. AI-driven insights helped me solve problems faster by giving details about where the issue is, similar to how we have a Juniper Marvis for Juniper. Cisco Wireless 9100 Access Points also help us in this regard.

I do not think that an improvement is needed for Cisco Wireless 9100 Access Points because it is working perfectly fine.

I have been using Cisco Wireless 9100 Access Points for the last five years.

Cisco Wireless 9100 Access Points are stable.

Cisco Wireless 9100 Access Points' scalability is good.

The customer support for Cisco Wireless 9100 Access Points is quite good.

Before using Cisco Wireless 9100 Access Points, we used different solutions depending on the company and the requirement of clients.

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing for Cisco Wireless 9100 Access Points is that it is good.

I cannot comment on a return on investment for Cisco Wireless 9100 Access Points since our company used to buy the product.

I did not evaluate other options before choosing Cisco Wireless 9100 Access Points as this was the requirement from the customer only.

My advice to others looking into using Cisco Wireless 9100 Access Points is that it is very good to use because it is reliable and secured. I would rate this product an 8 out of 10.

Cisco Wireless 9100 Access Points provides wireless coverage everywhere.

The feature I like the most is the management. Unified management has benefited our organization.

Cisco Wireless 9100 Access Points could improve by enhancing support. Tech support is more of a pain point.

We have been using Cisco Wireless 9100 Access Points for probably ten years.

I assess the stability and reliability of Cisco Wireless 9100 Access Points as good.

There are not any specific challenges we face with hybrid and distributed enterprise networks.

I evaluate the customer service and tech support from Cisco as usually good.

Prior to adopting Cisco Wireless 9100 Access Points, we were using Cisco for the longest time.

I describe my experience with deploying Cisco Wireless Access as very easy.

I assess the impact of Cisco Wireless 9100 Access Points on operational efficiency in managing our wireless network as very important.

My experience with pricing, setup, and licensing is that pricing is more expensive, but it is worth it.

Cisco optimizes the experience in a hybrid or distributed enterprise setup through the updates they provide.

My impression of the end-to-end visibility offered by Cisco is good. I rate this review a 9.

I use Cisco Wireless 9100 Access Points for Wi-Fi connectivity for our laptops and mobiles. Currently, we do not have any IoT applications; we just use Cisco Wireless 9100 Access Points for user Wi-Fi connectivity.

What I appreciate about Cisco Wireless 9100 Access Points is the convenience to operate them and install them across locations remotely or on-premise.

From Cisco DNA, we are not able to identify deep troubleshooting for the wireless network; we are doing the troubleshooting from the wireless controller itself.

We are not able to utilize the AI-driven analytics in Cisco Wireless 9100 Access Points because of our company's policy; we are not able to integrate Cisco cloud AI.

Sometimes there are disconnections that happen with user laptops. When we want to troubleshoot, the more advanced features that are cloud-generated by the AI would be helpful if we could use them at a minimalist level at the on-premise device.

We are following up on the DNA suggestions of the OS upgradation. Apart from that, the security measures of Cisco have not provided us with great help in reducing network vulnerabilities.

There are no missing features that I would like to see included in it in the future or enhanced in it.

I have been using Cisco Wireless 9100 Access Points for more than five years.

I rate the stability and performance of Cisco Wireless 9100 Access Points as excellent.

I do not find any limitations with the scalability of Cisco Wireless 9100 Access Points.

I evaluate customer service and technical support as excellent. On a scale of one to ten, that would definitely be a ten for the tech support.

From the start, we have been using Cisco Wireless 9100 Access Points, so there are no additional improvements we are observing.

In WLC, the initial setup is a little bit complex compared to the older versions of the WLC.

We consulted a consultant for the deployment process of Cisco Wireless 9100 Access Points.

I purchased Cisco Wireless 9100 Access Points through the consultant.

We have not evaluated any other options or solutions available in the market for wireless.

I am mostly working with Cisco access points and Cisco wireless controllers.

I am working with Catalyst 9100 Access Points and 2800 models, which are different models of access points.

My current company does not have Cisco DNA for remote troubleshooting installed in their infrastructure. I just moved to a different company. When I was working in DNAC two years ago, I was able to provide that kind of information.

In my current infrastructure, we have some instruments connected to the access points. We need to have a separate, specific model of access points with BLE enabled on them. Those specific access points can be used for low-energy instrument devices to be connected via wireless infrastructure.

Catalyst 9100 Access Points reduce network vulnerabilities. The frequency reuse technology is used in Wi-Fi 6 technology. The devices are nowadays intelligent compared to the legacy devices. They communicate with each other, adapt themselves, and improve the quality of Wi-Fi infrastructure connectivity within the premise. They are more robust and adaptable. They have significantly improved wireless connectivity compared to the legacy environment. The legacy environment was not effective with those kinds of algorithms, whereas Catalyst 9100 Access Points have different inbuilt features and are more optimized and adaptable to situations.

Catalyst 9100 Access Points provide Wi-Fi connection to end users, similar to home routers with broadband connectivity. When a technician connects the device to the modem, it starts providing Wi-Fi. The configuration is inbuilt, requiring only an IP address to operate. It listens to the wireless controller, and whatever SSID is configured in the controller will be broadcasting.

Catalyst 9100 Access Points are next-generation access points without the limitations of legacy access points. They have better reachability, signal strength, power utilization, and scalability. While legacy access points could accommodate 15 users practically, Catalyst 9100 Access Points can reach up to 40 or 50 users simultaneously on different radios with MIMO technology. There are different models of Catalyst 9100 Access Points depending on site requirements.

Wi-Fi 6 technology has improved wireless connectivity significantly. Post-pandemic, everything has become hybrid, and wireless network has become an undeniable infrastructure requirement. Previously, LAN cable connectors were used for better speed achievement. Now, Wi-Fi 6 technology has improved wireless connectivity to such an extent that LAN cable connectivity is no longer necessary. Users can work remotely with Wi-Fi connectivity, achieving both speed and scalability. The sixth-generation Wi-Fi provides improved bandwidth and security on wireless infrastructure.

With Catalyst 9100 Access Points being the best in the market for wireless infrastructure deployment, I do not see any room for suggestion. In terms of R&D, they will continue improving, but as an end user, I do not see much improvisation required.

I have been working with Catalyst 9100 Access Points for the last three or four years.

In terms of stability for Cisco access points, I would rate them 10 out of 10.

Scalability is good compared to legacy devices. Theoretically, you can connect up to 100 clients simultaneously, but practically, this is not feasible. There will be bandwidth deterioration, and 100 clients using the same bandwidth will impact the quality of service. However, scalability is very good compared to legacy devices and competitors.

I'm not working with Cisco solutions currently. In the last two or three years, I have moved on to different products after working on Cisco products.

I am an implementer, primarily on the remote side with the access point setup process. When they plug in the access point, if the switch configuration is in place, the access point automatically joins the controller. We just need to tag them in the correct roles, site, and policies, and they will start working.

I have experience with Catalyst 9100 Access Points personally. Access points do not require much application setup. They just need to be connected to the access switch port, and once connected, they will behave according to the configuration.

The initial setup for Cisco access points is plug-and-play configuration. You just need to plug it with the switch port configuration. They automatically join the controller and download the image. They are very user-friendly and simple devices. The physical layer has been replaced, with the cable to the Wi-Fi device or access point providing connectivity.

We have Juniper Mist, which is emerging, and HP access points, 40 APs as main competitors for Cisco.

Catalyst 9100 Access Points reduce network vulnerabilities. The frequency reuse technology is used in Wi-Fi 6 technology. The devices are intelligent compared to legacy devices. They communicate with each other, adapt themselves, and improve the quality of Wi-Fi infrastructure connectivity within the premise.

We do not use much on the analytics part. DNAC helps in analyzing the wireless infrastructure and understanding the score with AI technology, but my current organization does not have Cisco DNAC.

For large-scale deployment, Cisco is unmatched. For small-scale deployment, it depends on the budget because compared to Cisco's Meraki solution, other vendors offer better prices. The choice depends on the geographical zone, based on who provides the best service in their particular area, and the offers they provide to customers for procurement.

Overall rating: 10/10

My current use case for Catalyst 9100 Access Points is that we have offices, and we use it for our clients in their office spaces, mainly.

The features in Catalyst 9100 Access Points that I have found most valuable include that it's a complete solution; we go with Cisco because you have access points, you have a controller, you have Cisco ISE, and you have Cisco DNA Center. So all of these are part of one big solution.

These are very robust in the sense that they are quite stable. They provide higher throughputs and excellent performance. They are reliable and remain stable for years.

I am using remote troubleshooting in my network.

Catalyst 9100 Access Points is a very useful product, but it's quite an old one. Some quality of service features could be added as a high-end technical feature. The traffic analyzer is something which is quite useful.

We do some sort of rate limiting, per user, per AP. It needs to be more flexible when it comes to bandwidth allocation.

I suggest that Cisco can add functionality where the user should be able to allocate specific bandwidth at a user level. For example, if there are 10 users with limited internet bandwidth, that bandwidth should be able to be allocated equally to all users.

I have been working with Catalyst Access Points since the beginning, approximately three years now.

I would rate the stability of Catalyst 9100 Access Points as a nine.

I would rate the scalability of Catalyst 9100 Access Points as a nine; it's quite a scalable product from that point of view. Although we do not have a very big environment, it's quite scalable.

Technical support from Cisco has been a bit degraded lately because the first support we get is challenging. Eventually, we get into the Cisco TAC, and they give us the right technical person who is then able to resolve our queries. Initially, it is challenging.

Neutral

I would rate the initial setup for Catalyst Access Points as simple; it's been the same for at least 10 years. It's essentially unchanged and pretty much simple.

When comparing Catalyst switches and access points with other vendors, specifically Aruba, Cisco has an edge. The solution is complete, and the stability gives it an advantage.

I am aware that Catalyst 9100 Access Points are used for IoT applications, but at the moment, we are not using it. We may implement this in the future.

Regarding DNA software, now named Catalyst Center, we are using the assurance feature. The DNA Center provides wireless assurance, which we find useful.

I have recently enabled AI-driven analytics in Cisco.

I am aware of the Bluetooth Low Energy tracking capabilities feature.

Cisco access points support all the standard security requirements which are applicable.

We obtain Cisco access points through partners, as we are partners and we resell it to our customers.

I rate Catalyst 9100 Access Points a nine out of ten.