Hyland vs Nintex

Unbiased reviews from our professional community. A complete perspective on vendors based on user input.
Hyland
Based on 11 reviews.
Nintex
Based on 17 reviews.
Latest Research
Nintex Workflow vs. Hyland OnBase
Updated: November 2022
Hyland OnBase vs. Nintex Workflow
Updated: November 2022
Overview
Hyland Software Inc. is the developer of the enterprise content management and process management software suite called OnBase. Applications of the suite are used in healthcare, financial institutions, insurance, government, higher education and manufacturing. The firm has its headquarters in in Westlake, Ohio, and other offices in Lincoln, Nebraska; Irvine, California; Charlotte, North Carolina; Sao Paulo, Brazil; London, England; Tokyo, Japan; Andover, Massachusetts; and most recently, Salt Lake City, Utah and Tampa, Florida.
Information Not Available
Sample Customers
Hyland OnBase
Honda France Industries, Hill County Texas, Hylant Group, ING Lease France, State of South Carolina, Syracuse University, Swindon College, Rhode Island Department of Human Services, Rochester Institute of Technology, Moen, Odense University Hospital
Nintex Workflow
Asiacell, Hawke’s Bay Regional Council, National Metrology Institute of South Africa, Norwegian Olympic Committee, Schnitzer Steel, MT Højgaard, Lippuner
Popular Solutions
Top Industries
Computer Software Company
18%
Comms Service Provider
10%
Government
10%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Comms Service Provider
19%
Computer Software Company
17%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Government
9%
Quotes From Member Reviews
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Most Helpful Reviews
Customer Service
Review 1 of 9
Review 1 of 8
Technical Support
No Data Available
No Data Available
We monitor all reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.