Windows Server Reviews

We use it for the operating system.

I like its simplicity. 

It would be better if they had more security features and fewer bugs. They can also improve their technical support.

I have been working with Windows Server for about ten years.

Windows Server is a stable solution.

Windows Server is scalable.

Technical support isn't very good. I would rate it somewhere in the middle.

The initial setup was straightforward.

It could be cheaper. 

I would tell potential users that it depends on the solution and the setup. If it's related to security, maybe it's better to go for Linux. If they're looking for usage and administration, they can go for Windows.

On a scale from one to ten, I would give Windows Server a seven.

We use this solution for virtualization and the remote desktop.

We like the performance. 

We use this solution because we need Microsoft. It's not a choice about the other operating systems.

I have been using Windows Servers for approximately five years.

We are not yet using the latest version. We are using version 2016.

We have approximately 80 users in our company and we have a range of a couple of customers to 1,000 customers who are using this solution.

Technical support is okay.

The initial setup is pretty straightforward.

Depending on the size of the infrastructure, you need one single person single-handedly to four or five people to maintain this solution.

The price could be better and the licensing model could be easier to understand.

Our customers prefer lifetime licenses.

I would recommend this solution to others who are interested in using it.

I would rate Windows Server an eight out of ten.

We're using it primarily for domain control, additional domains, and servers. Everything is used under the Windows platform.

I like that it's simple and the users are happy. 

It could be more secure. We can't compare it to other products because they have their own security and all those things. When it comes to email security, there are issues. Microsoft products used to get hacked all the time, but we're still comfortable with that.

I have been using Windows Server for almost ten years, and we're still using it.

It was a straightforward installation.

My four-member team of engineers can install and manage it themselves.

I would recommend this solution to potential users.

On a scale from one to ten, I would give Windows Server a seven.

We use these servers for databases and applications.

The most valuable feature of this solution is the ESRP that is used with the Windows Platform.

Windows Platforms become rather complicated. We started with the Windows Platform because they simplified it, but now, it has become quite complicated.

The administration has become quite heavy and also the specialization. 

We are a rather small factory, not a big system. We are small with a thousand employees, and we need a simplified environment.

In the next release, I would like to see the administration simplified.

I have been using Windows Server for more than 20 years. 

The version we are using is quite new, 2020.

Windows Server is stable.

It is scalable, but the administration becomes quite complicated.

We have not used the technical support, we have had contact with the third-party partners.

The initial setup of Windows Server is straightforward.

In our country, the Windows platform is widespread, which means there is a high amount of usage. We primarily use Windows Solutions. Some also use Linux, but Linux is the minority.

I would rate Windows Server a seven out of ten.

We primarily use the solution as a database.

The product, overall, is very simple. It's easy to use and navigate. It's got a good design.

The implementation is very easy. It doesn't give you any trouble.

The stability is okay, however, it could be better. It's an area that they could improve on if they wanted to.

I've been using the solution for two years at this point.

The stability is somewhere in between good and bad. It's so-so. It could be better. 

We have 15 people that use the solution, and five engineers that manage everything as necessary.

We do plan to continue to use the product going forward.

I don't really need the assistance of technical support. I'm an engineer. Typically, I can fix any issues that may arise. Therefore, I don't contact Microsoft. I can't speak to their support service and how helpful they are.

We found the initial setup to be very simple and straightforward. It's not complex. We didn't have any issues.

I can't recall how long the actual deployment took. It was a while ago now.

I handled the installation by myself. You only really need one person to deploy the product.

We have engineers that can handle maintenance on the solution in our company.

I handled the implementation myself. I didn't need to have the installation done by a consultant or integrator.

We only really use Windows Server for one thing. We don't have too complicated of a setup.

I would recommend the solution to other organizations. I've mostly been happy with the product overall.

I'd rate the solution at a nine out of ten.

We use this solution for common management and group policy management. Within our organization, there are between 300 to 400 people using this solution and we intend to expand and continue using Windows Server in the future.

The user interface could be simplified. Sometimes I feel like there are too many things going on at once. It should be easier to navigate and find the functions that I am trying to implement. 

I have been using this solution for roughly 20 years.

Windows Server is reasonably stable.

The technical support is okay. Sometimes Microsoft cannot answer our questions quickly or precisely. There are times when we need to trouble-shoot on our own.

The initial setup was straightforward. We had it fully installed within one or two hours.

On a scale from one to ten, I would give this solution a rating of eight.

I primarily use Windows Server as a hypervisor, running Hyper-V.

I would like to see the security features improved in the future.

I have been using Windows Server for about 15 years.

This is a stable product and we plan to continue using it in the future.

There are more than 10,000 users for the services that we have running.

I have not needed to contact technical support for Windows Server.

We only use Microsoft products, so we did not use another product before this one.

The initial setup with Microsoft products is always straightforward. The length of time for deployment depends on the services that are being implemented.

In some cases, I use a consultant to assist with deployment. However, this is not always the case because our in-house team can also do it.

We have about five people in our team for deployment.

We did not evaluate options by other vendors. Microsoft is a well-known brand and the only company to use for some services.

This is a good product and one that I can recommend.

I would rate this solution an eight out of ten.

We are using it for Active Directory, DNS, and TCP.

The solution is deployed on-premise. There are over 5,000 people using this solution in my company.

The solution is easy to use. We are satisfied with its performance.

We are waiting for the solution to be more secure and more stable.

I have been using this solution for about 10 years.

It could be more stable.

We have enterprise rights for support for Microsoft. We communicate with them on tickets.

The complexity of setup just depends. Sometimes it takes half a day, and sometimes it takes one or two hours.

For maintenance, we have one manager and two operation specialists.

We have sometimes used a consultant for deployment. For example, we have one for AD FS role, but we don't have DNS, TCP, Active Directory. We manage it by ourselves.

We have an enterprise agreement.

I would rate this solution 9 out of 10. 

I would recommend this solution for someone who wants to start using it.