The main problem of Bastion, CyberArk, and WALLIX is that they have the same interface for both administration and users, which is not a good idea from a security perspective. Also, there should be more effort to increase the level of security.

View full review »

The auditing and reporting features of WALLIX Bastion could be improved. Customizable reports could be introduced to generate dynamic reports based on our requirements. Adding flowcharts for the reporting section would enhance its utility. View full review »

Reporting requires improvement; it is basic, allowing only CSV file extraction with no analytics features. The password rotation feature is not as intuitive as it should be, necessitating more awareness of its two-step process. The reporting and analytics capabilities need enhancement to provide better insights. View full review »

WALLIX Bastion is GUI-driven, but it sometimes needs some management. The solution’s reporting and alerting could be improved.

View full review »

The disadvantage is that they have to optimize it to use fewer resources. They have to go forward and add some technology to grow so fast.

It needs to meet certain PQI solutions, including single sign-on, multi-factor authentication, and TDS connections. To keep up with the growing market and increasing customer challenges, they need to enhance Bastion and accelerate its development.

View full review »

Based on my experience as a sales tech person, one area of improvement could be a more unified licensing model.

For example, if you look at BeyondTrust, their licensing is more straightforward. They only ask about the number of assets you need to protect, and there's no additional cost for external users or third-party vendors.

With WALLIX Bastion, there's a separate fee for external users to access the environment. It would be great if they could unify the licensing so that customers don't have to pay separate fees for different types of users. It would make the pricing more transparent and easier to understand.

Even if the total cost stays the same, a unified approach would be much simpler and more convenient for customers. It's about clarity and ease of understanding.

View full review »

There could be more automation features for the solution. Also, its user behavior analysis using machine learning needs improvement.

View full review »

It would be better enhanced features like if an example I could manage multiple accounts in one place, like other leading PAM solution. With WALLIX, you can only manage one account, and you are given a separate connection which will add as an extra device. You have to create and click on each connection for any variation if any on nthe single connection.

For example, other leading PAM solution might give three options for one connection if you want to have an interactive user-level experience. But with WALLIX, you have to click three times with different connections created to get that access where u can have one connection more enhanced features 

Also, the biggest disadvantage of WALLIX is the reporting or behavioral analysis limited. I feel like it's very weak in reporting when compared to the other solutions. As a solution, they're good and stable. But they need to make their reports neater and better. Right now, we're going to the console and then pressing buttons every single time for each every session 

im sure its there in the road map and development soon... its not a drawback...its more of a suggestion..after using wallix...you will realise rest requirements is minor

View full review »

The product doesn't have behavior analytics. They promised to develop this, but only for the cloud, not for on-premise versions.

I want the solution to offer two-factor authentication for Windows Active Directory. They lack this functionality. 

View full review »

The performance of WALLIX Bastion's password manager is very low.

View full review »

The password management needs improvement. Management of Access Manager should be improved as well. 

View full review »