Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Senior Engineering Lead at Persistent Systems
MSP
Top 20
Apr 14, 2025
Dynamic refresh and seamless upgrades enhance application performance
Pros and Cons
  • "Unqork has a valuable feature known as dynamic refresh, released last year."
  • "Unqork needs improvement in mobile application support, as competitors offer this feature."

What is our primary use case?

Our primary use case for Unqork is a medical, hospital-based application where users can book appointments with providers, schedule or reschedule appointments, check provider availability, and check the distance from the patient's location to the provider's location. It also allows users to book virtual visits, which means appointments can be made for online consultations. These facilities are all available within our system.

What is most valuable?

Unqork has a valuable feature known as dynamic refresh, released last year. This feature improves performance by loading only the required page on demand instead of loading the entire content page. This dynamic refresh significantly enhances performance. Additionally, the integration capabilities are robust, with administrator features like API parameters and TLS security ensuring secure data transfer. Unqork’s seamless upgrade system ensures bug-free production environments.

What needs improvement?

Unqork needs improvement in mobile application support, as competitors offer this feature. Additionally, performance on the no-code platform needs enhancement to match the speed of coding websites, as the initial load time could be optimized.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using Unqork for more than three years.
Buyer's Guide
Unqork
March 2026
Learn what your peers think about Unqork. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: March 2026.
885,264 professionals have used our research since 2012.

What was my experience with deployment of the solution?

The deployment process for Unqork is straightforward, as it is a cloud-based application. Configuration is done through their interface, and once published, it automatically deploys to Staging. The process from Staging to QA requires selecting and promoting modules, which is easy via Unqork's interface.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

I rate Unqork's stability as an eight out of ten. There are some restrictions, and as a new platform, it lacks external community support that other platforms have.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

I rate Unqork's scalability as eight out of ten. Unqork consistently works in the background, releasing new components, and provides comprehensive documentation. The community support is excellent, with quick response times to queries.

How are customer service and support?

The technical support from Unqork is rated as eight out of ten. Sometimes, they struggle to understand our exact queries and may categorize critical issues as lower priority.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

Before Unqork, I was involved with Java tools for coding and SQL databases. Unqork's no-code platform eliminates the need for extensive database management by using MongoDB internally.

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup of Unqork is rated seven out of ten. Some restrictions and dependencies on Unqork exist, particularly in mobile applications and customization, which can be challenging.

What about the implementation team?

Approximately ten people were involved in the development of Unqork, but only three handled the deployment. Each person managed different stages of deployment: Staging to QA, QA to UAT, and UAT to Production.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

Before choosing Unqork, we evaluated other options. However, the ability to release a full application rapidly with Unqork was a key factor. They also provided a dedicated point of contact for any issues.

What other advice do I have?

I would rate Unqork an eight out of ten overall. I deducted points due to the lack of mobile application development and certain customization restrictions.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

Public Cloud
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
PeerSpot user
Senior Software Engineer at a retailer with 5,001-10,000 employees
Real User
Top 5
Apr 2, 2025
No-code capabilities save time but learning resources and collaboration need improvement
Pros and Cons
  • "I would recommend Unqork because of its time-saving capabilities and ease of use."
  • "Unqork needs to improve its learning resources because there aren't many available on platforms like YouTube or Google."

What is our primary use case?

I use Unqork as a no-code platform to create various types of websites based on user requirements. For example, I can use it for developing solutions for insurance, banking-related issues, transaction-related matters, and claim-related matters. This allows me to easily develop what I need without writing extensive code.

What is most valuable?

In Unqork, I don't have to write long codes. The drag-and-drop feature allows me to create forms with components like text fields and email components easily. I can set up validation for email and phone numbers to ensure correctness. Additionally, Unqork allows direct API integration, whether internal or external, facilitating easier development compared to other technologies. It also promotes the use of module-based applications and workflow options, which aids in application scalability and stability.

What needs improvement?

Unqork needs to improve its learning resources because there aren't many available on platforms like YouTube or Google. Furthermore, troubleshooting is an area for improvement as errors should be visible directly in the code platform rather than just the web browser console. Collaboration needs enhancement since, currently, multiple developers cannot work simultaneously on the same functionality.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been working with Unqork since last September.

What was my experience with deployment of the solution?

The initial setup with Unqork is straightforward. I need to create a workspace, and within that, create an application by defining its type, such as content-based or API-based. Depending on the selection, the corresponding UI options are provided, and it takes only two to three minutes for the setup.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

The main issue I have with Unqork is the limited availability of learning resources. While other technologies have various resources available, Unqork mainly relies on its community hub and learning platforms.

How are customer service and support?

Unqork provides tech support and community support. I can raise tickets, and Unqork will respond and provide solutions accordingly.

How would you rate customer service and support?

Neutral

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

I have worked with both Mendix and Unqork. In comparison, Unqork is a no-code platform, while Mendix allows coding by the user. Collaboration and functionalities differ significantly between both platforms.

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup is straightforward and involves creating a workspace where I create the application by specifying its type. If the application is module-based, specific details about what is to be done in that module are required. The entire setup hardly takes two to three minutes.

What was our ROI?

Time-saving is a substantial benefit, as I can develop applications with multiple functionalities in just a few days.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

I am not aware of the pricing, but I know that the certification cost is around $200, which is valid for one year.

What other advice do I have?

I would recommend Unqork because of its time-saving capabilities and ease of use. However, Unqork should enhance its collaboration features, as currently, only one developer can work on a functionality at a time. Unqork could work on improving this aspect. Overall, I rate Unqork a six out of ten.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

Public Cloud

If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?

Other
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
PeerSpot user
Buyer's Guide
Unqork
March 2026
Learn what your peers think about Unqork. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: March 2026.
885,264 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Software engineer 2 at Quantiphi
Real User
Top 5Leaderboard
May 9, 2025
Enables rapid project delivery through dynamic functionality
Pros and Cons
  • "What I appreciate best about Unqork is the dynamic refresh feature."
  • "I might have faced a problem with scalability. They are implementing a new version, which is not so good according to what I have heard from other configurers from other companies."

What is our primary use case?

Mostly we build finance applications and insurance and finance. These days we stick to finance rather than insurance. In the beginning, we used to build insurance applications as well. That is all from the past experience I have.

What is most valuable?

What I appreciate best about Unqork is the dynamic refresh feature. It refreshes the modules or whatever data dynamically. We can complete applications faster compared to other platforms such as Pega, Appian, or others. That is what I hear and what I have seen also. That is the biggest achievement we can accomplish using Unqork. I'm not criticizing other technologies but we can achieve results faster compared to other technologies. The security level is also good. The drag and drop functionality in Unqork is very nice actually. When compared with other technologies or BPM technologies, it performs well. There is no need for technical experience or coding knowledge to work with Unqork. Users can easily learn from the documentation, debug, and develop.

What needs improvement?

I might have faced a problem with scalability. They are implementing a new version, which is not so good according to what I have heard from other configurers from other companies. Rather than moving to other versions, they should enhance the performance.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using Unqork for more than three and a half years, approximately 3.6 years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

Sometimes we encounter issues, but not frequently. Unqork is very reliable most of the time, with rare exceptions. We have experienced issues that can be resolved within three to five days because they deploy developments monthly. Due to that reason, it might affect performance or technical aspects, but they can resolve it. From a data breach perspective, it does not get affected. Only the performance aspect gets affected. For stability, I would rate it a nine.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

My impressions of the scalability of Unqork are positive regarding the development of code and configuration. The workflow method and the module-based methods are good features.

How are customer service and support?

The support in terms of tickets we raise is good, but if there is an issue or breakdown in the environment, it takes some time for them to resolve the issue. Otherwise, they have a good supporting team.

How would you rate customer service and support?

Positive

How was the initial setup?

Regarding the initial setup, I find it straightforward. We just need to connect with their team and ask for devops-related requirements. They can install it and implement things according to the company's needs.

What other advice do I have?

Anyone can use Unqork. Every month, there is a new improvement in performance, component enhancement, new components, technical aspects, features, and security. The only observation about Unqork technology is that initially they provide basic devops services. If you want to increase the service for performance, we need to raise a request. There are basic, primary, secondary, and enterprise versions. Based on the investment in Unqork servers, the response time varies. For their support, I would rate them between seven to eight. I would recommend this product to other people. My advice is that if organizations want low cost with good features and good productivity, they can use this technology. Overall, I rate Unqork a nine out of ten.
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
PeerSpot user
Senior Software Engineer at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees
Real User
Top 10
Apr 25, 2025
Improved project workflow with minimal coding and comprehensive UI solutions
Pros and Cons
  • "Unqork's performance is better than Power Apps, which can be slow with many components."
  • "I feel that the design and view aspects of Unqork could be improved. I need to add extra CSS to enhance its appearance."

What is our primary use case?

I am currently working on an insurance project based on the Unqork platform. My use cases include creating policy details screens and beneficiary screens to collect insurance data. This data is saved into a schema, and I manipulate and retrieve it using the front-end Unqork UI. I also integrate external APIs in the service administration to retrieve and pass all the necessary data.

What is most valuable?

Unqork is scalable and easy to use, especially for those who are not interested in extensive coding. Its drag-and-drop interface makes it easy to implement logic and relationships between components with just logical thinking. Unqork's scalability allows me to adjust performance or client requirements using external services. The Vega Grid feature benefits the UI designer schema, providing an all-in-one grid solution. Additionally, the data model feature allows reuse across common schemas.

What needs improvement?

I feel that the design and view aspects of Unqork could be improved. I need to add extra CSS to enhance its appearance. Offering pre-built CSS options to users would be beneficial. Additionally, the setup for API calls was initially challenging, especially when dealing with service logs and transforming large JSON codes for validation and PDF generation.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been working with the Unqork tool for three years and four months.

What was my experience with deployment of the solution?

The deployment process was guided by Unqork Academy's documentation. By following best practices, the setup, including workflows and modules, takes about thirty minutes each.

How are customer service and support?

I frequently rely on tech support from Unqork and typically receive answers within three days. They also offer workarounds when necessary. I rate their support as eight out of ten.

How would you rate customer service and support?

Positive

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

I have experience in Power Platform, including Power Apps, Canvas Apps, Power Automate, and Power BI. Unqork's performance is better than Power Apps, which can be slow with many components.

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup was straightforward for the front-end. However, I experienced difficulties with the API setup, specifically in calling APIs within APIs and dealing with service logs.

What about the implementation team?

The Unqork Academy provides comprehensive documentation that I followed during implementation.

What was our ROI?

Using Unqork has resulted in improved cost-saving, time-saving, and resource-saving benefits for our projects.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

I receive Unqork through my company, and it is free for me to use, so I am not aware of the pricing or licensing costs.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

I have used Power Platform solutions like Power Apps and Power BI. However, Unqork offers better overall performance and functionality for our needs.

What other advice do I have?

I recommend following Unqork documentation and practicing extensively to find new ways of improving project workflows. I rate Unqork ten out of ten for insurance projects. On a scale of 1 to 10, I would rate the overall solution a 10.
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
PeerSpot user
User
Top 20
Apr 2, 2025
Time efficiency and streamlined development with enhanced deployment and support
Pros and Cons
  • "I recommend Unqork for those wanting to start their careers, particularly in sectors like insurance and banking."
  • "Occasionally, during server-side execution with multiple loops, we encounter timeout issues, which is something we've had to address with technical support."

What is our primary use case?

Initially, I underwent Bootcamp training with Unqork, which involved completing simple use cases such as adding information on a screen and validating it based on user input. In my organizational project, I worked on a client project called Evidence of Insurance, a life and disability insurance project with multiple screens and validations. I've also contributed to a similar project with New York Life Insurance, focusing on functionalities like getting appropriate state and country details, and deploying the code to QA regions. My experience also includes working on data workflow, internal services, and creating rules using Unqork.

What is most valuable?

Unqork allows for time efficiency with minimal coding due to its drag-and-drop functionality, enabling us to expedite the creation of pages compared to other technologies like Java and .NET. Additionally, Unqork supports snippets, including built-in options available in its marketplace, which helps to streamline the development process further. Snippets are a particularly effective feature, allowing recurring entries like SSN or phone numbers to be easily managed. The ease of deployment across regions and the presence of a responsive support system further add to its value.

What needs improvement?

The timeout issue during server-side execution, specifically with loops, needs improvement. More features could be added to the data workflow, and there should also be enhancements in internal services, including updates and deletions.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have around two years of experience with Unqork.

What was my experience with deployment of the solution?

When they updated from the classic version to a new runtime version, it was challenging to adapt since the visual aspects and settings of data workflow changed.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

Occasionally, during server-side execution with multiple loops, we encounter timeout issues, which is something we've had to address with technical support.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

It appears to be scalable with frequent updates and technical improvements, and it is anticipated to be even more scalable in the future.

How are customer service and support?

I would rate Unqork's technical support as an eight. They are responsive to queries and issues.

How would you rate customer service and support?

Positive

How was the initial setup?

Setting up Unqork is straightforward with readily available resources like Unqork academy, training environment, and community for support. It provides ample documentation and video tutorials to guide new users.

What was our ROI?

Our team has managed to complete projects well ahead of client expectations, garnering positive feedback and extensions. Client satisfaction has resulted in increased project value.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

I have started learning OutSystems but do not have enough expertise to compare it with Unqork effectively.

What other advice do I have?

I recommend Unqork for those wanting to start their careers, particularly in sectors like insurance and banking. Unqork is frequently updated, offering opportunities with larger companies as it gains popularity. I would rate Unqork as a nine out of ten.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

Public Cloud

If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?

Other
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
PeerSpot user
reviewer2703186 - PeerSpot reviewer
Lead Engineer at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees
Real User
Top 20
May 7, 2025
Fast UI creation and responsive support improve project efficiency
Pros and Cons
  • "The Unqork team is highly available and responsive."
  • "There are few aspects that need improvement. I can't find any documentation or instructional videos on YouTube."

What is our primary use case?

I am using Unqork in the insurance and finance domain. I work in India, and most projects come from companies we term as 'onshore.' Currently, I am working with Transamerica, an insurance company, and previously, I worked for the Commonwealth Bank of Australia.

What is most valuable?

The major differences with Unqork compared to other platforms include its drag-and-drop functionality, which makes it a low-code, no-code platform. Despite being launched in 2017 and having limited external documentation, it provides an internal platform for help. Unqork has partnered with MongoDB for database support within applications. I can create a fully-fledged UI much faster compared to traditional coding. For example, what might take a day using conventional methods may only take an hour or two with Unqork.

What needs improvement?

There are few aspects that need improvement. I can't find any documentation or instructional videos on YouTube. Learning requires going through certifications that can take several months. There's also a community page, but it doesn't offer instant responses like AI-powered platforms. Another issue is with design compatibility; Unqork has its own styling which often conflicts with designs provided by clients, requiring custom CSS to adjust without disturbing the existing styles.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been working with Unqork for three years.

What was my experience with deployment of the solution?

There were challenges like integrating certificates for SSO and HTTP, but these were quickly resolved by the Unqork team, who are highly responsive through their Zendesk ticket system.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

I have been using Unqork for three years and have not faced any kind of stability issues. The only limitation is the lack of external documentation.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

I haven't observed any scalability issues. Our projects contain multiple modules, and Unqork allows creating databases within its containers, offering great flexibility without any concerns.

How are customer service and support?

The Unqork team is highly available and responsive. They offer solutions quickly, and I rate their technical support as excellent.

How would you rate customer service and support?

Neutral

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

Before working with Unqork, I have used low-code/no-code platforms like Bubble UI, Workato, and Boomi by Dell for previous projects.

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup was straightforward. For basic tasks, all it takes is dragging and dropping components, making it very easy to use. Certificate integration is simple, requiring string input to update.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

I have worked with other low-code/no-code platforms like Bubble UI and Workato but not as direct alternatives to Unqork.

What other advice do I have?

I would rate Unqork around eight out of ten. It is a good platform, but the lack of external resources and documentation makes solving issues challenging. For API endpoints, Unqork requires manually checking modules, unlike the ease found in traditional coding. For these reasons, Unqork scores less in some areas despite its strengths in quick development and built-in resources.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

Public Cloud

If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?

Other
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
PeerSpot user
Tech Lead at a tech services company with 201-500 employees
Real User
Top 20
Apr 24, 2025
Deployment process improves productivity but optimizations are needed in new features
Pros and Cons
  • "The technical support for Unqork is excellent, receiving a nine out of ten."
  • "There are areas in Unqork that need improvement. The ongoing development of the Vega feature, which is built on React compared to the older Century built on AngularJS, should be optimized."

What is our primary use case?

Our primary use case for Unqork includes working on projects in various domains. First, it was with ONHS related to the oncology healthcare department. Second, it was with UBS in the financial domain. Third, it involved Guardian Life, an insurance company based in America. Currently, we are working with Grayscale, a platform for digital coins investment like Bitcoin or Ethereum.

What is most valuable?

The deployment process of Unqork is highly valuable. The platform provides features such as grids to easily change the UI without writing extra code. Dynamic grids allow for changes without additional coding. The integration capabilities are also notable, with flexibility in using internal or external services for data storage. Unqork’s stability is commendable, with no bugs reported in the stable version. The DLC toolkit facilitates promoting projects with a single click, enhancing productivity.

What needs improvement?

There are areas in Unqork that need improvement. The ongoing development of the Vega feature, which is built on React compared to the older Century built on AngularJS, should be optimized. Vega promises faster experience, but it's still in progress. Additionally, there are limitations like showing a grid with a tree-like structure that Unqork currently cannot achieve.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been working with Unqork for five years. Although I have a total of eight years in software development, the first three were focused on Node.js.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

Unqork is very stable. With the Century version, I have not seen any bugs or instability in the last five years. However, users may encounter instability with the developing Vega feature as it is ongoing. Overall, I would rate the stability as ten out of ten.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

Unqork's scalability is good, and I would rate it as eight or nine out of ten. Its ease of use, minimal need for extra logic, and good integration capabilities make it significant.

How are customer service and support?

The technical support for Unqork is excellent, receiving a nine out of ten. I receive assurance that the team is addressing my issue within one to two hours, and I'll get a response within two working days.

How would you rate customer service and support?

Positive

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

Before Unqork, I worked with the MEAN stack, specifically Angular and Node.js. With Angular and Node.js, extra code was needed to manage data tables and deployment required setting up servers and using version control like Git. In contrast, Unqork simplifies these processes.

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup of Unqork is straightforward, and I would rate it eight or nine out of ten. Mastering the DWPF and dynamic grids is essential, which simplifies much of the setup. The community is active and responsive, enhancing the overall setup experience.

What other advice do I have?

Unqork has some limitations, so ensure your requirements are assessable before deciding. For new developers, focusing on workflow and data workflow is essential. I rate the overall solution as seven out of ten.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

Public Cloud

If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?

Other
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
PeerSpot user
Performance Tester at a tech vendor with 201-500 employees
Real User
Top 10
Apr 22, 2025
User-friendly platform enables seamless navigation and efficient performance testing
Pros and Cons
  • "Unqork is user-friendly and allows easy navigation for users without technical knowledge."

    What is our primary use case?

    I was a performance tester at Unqork for around one and a half years. I worked specifically with the Unqork dashboard application, thoroughly testing its performance and navigating different functionalities within the platform.

    What is most valuable?

    Unqork is user-friendly and allows easy navigation for users without technical knowledge. It provides the ability to renew policies after expiration without needing to recreate them. Once the application is fully developed, it becomes highly stable, allowing for effective performance testing. Its scalability is notable with low page load time, and it supports numerous functionalities easily.

    What needs improvement?

    I would like to see more detailed information on policies, as some are defined using technical language.

    For how long have I used the solution?

    I worked with Unqork for around one and a half years.

    What was my experience with deployment of the solution?

    During deployment, some code changes required me to rescript performance testing scripts, which is a standard practice whenever there is a change in code.

    What do I think about the stability of the solution?

    Unqork is stable once about 90% of the application is developed. Its stability improved significantly after the initial stages of development.

    What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

    Unqork's scalability is great. It loads pages quickly, even with numerous submission IDs and test data on the dashboard, which is advantageous.

    How are customer service and support?

    I reached out for Virtual Machines (VMs) needed for performance testing with 100 users. The interaction was helpful.

    How would you rate customer service and support?

    Neutral

    How was the initial setup?

    The initial setup involved working in a three-week sprint cycle with user stories. Deployment occurred every sprint, progressing from test to production stages.

    What about the implementation team?

    I was the only performance tester among six to seven developers, two leads, and two managers, along with three to four manual testers.

    What was our ROI?

    Unqork provided cost savings as I managed all performance testing tasks single-handedly.

    What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

    During rate and price calculations, when fields were entered and the calculate button clicked, the process initially took 18 seconds to load, but after resolving a bug, it took only 10 seconds.

    Which other solutions did I evaluate?

    I have not worked with any other no-code solutions apart from Unqork.

    What other advice do I have?

    I would recommend Unqork to others because it offers extensive functionalities and provides a good opportunity for learning. I rate Unqork nine out of ten overall.
    Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
    PeerSpot user