Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Senior Software Engineer at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
Real User
Efficient low-code development boosts productivity and reduces time complexity significantly
Pros and Cons
  • "Unqork has helped reduce the time complexity and development time significantly."
  • "When developing large platforms with significant traffic, there are scalability challenges, which might affect performance."

What is our primary use case?

Initially, I started working with Unqork for our real estate clients, creating a platform where users can list, sell, and rent properties. The platform was interactive, allowing clients and consumers to engage in property transactions. I also worked on a digital onboarding platform for Transamerica to simplify the onboarding process of clients for retirement plans and fund management. The goal was to convert traditional, lengthy processes into quick, digital ones.

How has it helped my organization?

Unqork has helped reduce the time complexity and development time significantly. Tasks that traditionally took two days can be accomplished in four hours with Unqork, thus saving time and money.

What is most valuable?

Unqork is a low-code, no-code platform that provides pre-built functionalities, allowing quick development by just dragging and dropping components. It supports both front-end and back-end development, being cloud-based, offering flexibility in usage. I can use Unqork for front-end, back-end, or both, enabling seamless integration with existing systems. Unqork sets up development, QA, UAT, and production environments in the cloud, facilitating easier testing and deployment. Improvements over time include features like version control which have enhanced its functionality significantly. Though there were issues initially with features like branching, Unqork has been improving day by day.

What needs improvement?

Although Unqork has made improvements in development view, I suggest focusing on data handling and integration performance, especially with higher data volumes. This includes making platforms smoother for high data volume handling. Another area I would like to see enhancements is regarding sophisticated development UI; more focus should be on performing optimally than having a sophisticated developer UI.
Buyer's Guide
Unqork
April 2025
Learn what your peers think about Unqork. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: April 2025.
849,686 professionals have used our research since 2012.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been working with Unqork for more than three years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

Unqork is generally stable and reliable when following the best practices and recommendations provided by Unqork's documentation. Issues arise when developers do not adhere to recommended guidelines, leading to performance degradation.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

Unqork benefits business projects by speeding up development time. However, when developing large platforms with significant traffic, there are scalability challenges, which might affect performance.

How are customer service and support?

Unqork's technical support is efficient, allowing users to create tickets directly within their environment. I have had positive experiences where issues were addressed promptly within 48 hours.

How would you rate customer service and support?

Positive

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

I have not worked with other low-code, no-code solutions before using Unqork.

How was the initial setup?

Initial setup is straightforward as Unqork is cloud-based. Clients receive all the necessary credentials and rights, making it easy for users to log in and start development.

What about the implementation team?

The simplicity of Unqork's setup allows for easy user management and permissions configuration.

What was our ROI?

The platform offers a mid-range pricing model, similar to other solutions in the market, leading to reasonable cost savings and ROI.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

My knowledge is limited to Unqork’s certification pricing; I am not aware of specific platform pricing.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

I explored another platform called Decisions but found Unqork to be simpler and more understandable.

What other advice do I have?

I recommend Unqork for internal platforms and domains like insurance with manageable traffic. However, I am cautious about recommending it for public platforms with high traffic until improvements in handling large data volumes are made. I rate Unqork as an eight out of ten for its overall functionality. Overall, I rate the product eight out of ten.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

Public Cloud

If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?

Other
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Flag as inappropriate
PeerSpot user
Senior Engineering Lead at Persistent Systems
MSP
Dynamic refresh and seamless upgrades enhance application performance
Pros and Cons
  • "Unqork has a valuable feature known as dynamic refresh, released last year."
  • "Unqork needs improvement in mobile application support, as competitors offer this feature."

What is our primary use case?

Our primary use case for Unqork is a medical, hospital-based application where users can book appointments with providers, schedule or reschedule appointments, check provider availability, and check the distance from the patient's location to the provider's location. It also allows users to book virtual visits, which means appointments can be made for online consultations. These facilities are all available within our system.

What is most valuable?

Unqork has a valuable feature known as dynamic refresh, released last year. This feature improves performance by loading only the required page on demand instead of loading the entire content page. This dynamic refresh significantly enhances performance. Additionally, the integration capabilities are robust, with administrator features like API parameters and TLS security ensuring secure data transfer. Unqork’s seamless upgrade system ensures bug-free production environments.

What needs improvement?

Unqork needs improvement in mobile application support, as competitors offer this feature. Additionally, performance on the no-code platform needs enhancement to match the speed of coding websites, as the initial load time could be optimized.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using Unqork for more than three years.

What was my experience with deployment of the solution?

The deployment process for Unqork is straightforward, as it is a cloud-based application. Configuration is done through their interface, and once published, it automatically deploys to Staging. The process from Staging to QA requires selecting and promoting modules, which is easy via Unqork's interface.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

I rate Unqork's stability as an eight out of ten. There are some restrictions, and as a new platform, it lacks external community support that other platforms have.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

I rate Unqork's scalability as eight out of ten. Unqork consistently works in the background, releasing new components, and provides comprehensive documentation. The community support is excellent, with quick response times to queries.

How are customer service and support?

The technical support from Unqork is rated as eight out of ten. Sometimes, they struggle to understand our exact queries and may categorize critical issues as lower priority.

How would you rate customer service and support?

Positive

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

Before Unqork, I was involved with Java tools for coding and SQL databases. Unqork's no-code platform eliminates the need for extensive database management by using MongoDB internally.

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup of Unqork is rated seven out of ten. Some restrictions and dependencies on Unqork exist, particularly in mobile applications and customization, which can be challenging.

What about the implementation team?

Approximately ten people were involved in the development of Unqork, but only three handled the deployment. Each person managed different stages of deployment: Staging to QA, QA to UAT, and UAT to Production.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

Before choosing Unqork, we evaluated other options. However, the ability to release a full application rapidly with Unqork was a key factor. They also provided a dedicated point of contact for any issues.

What other advice do I have?

I would rate Unqork an eight out of ten overall. I deducted points due to the lack of mobile application development and certain customization restrictions.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

Public Cloud

If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?

Other
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Flag as inappropriate
PeerSpot user
Buyer's Guide
Unqork
April 2025
Learn what your peers think about Unqork. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: April 2025.
849,686 professionals have used our research since 2012.
User
Top 20
Time efficiency and streamlined development with enhanced deployment and support
Pros and Cons
  • "I recommend Unqork for those wanting to start their careers, particularly in sectors like insurance and banking."
  • "Occasionally, during server-side execution with multiple loops, we encounter timeout issues, which is something we've had to address with technical support."

What is our primary use case?

Initially, I underwent Bootcamp training with Unqork, which involved completing simple use cases such as adding information on a screen and validating it based on user input. In my organizational project, I worked on a client project called Evidence of Insurance, a life and disability insurance project with multiple screens and validations. I've also contributed to a similar project with New York Life Insurance, focusing on functionalities like getting appropriate state and country details, and deploying the code to QA regions. My experience also includes working on data workflow, internal services, and creating rules using Unqork.

What is most valuable?

Unqork allows for time efficiency with minimal coding due to its drag-and-drop functionality, enabling us to expedite the creation of pages compared to other technologies like Java and .NET. Additionally, Unqork supports snippets, including built-in options available in its marketplace, which helps to streamline the development process further. Snippets are a particularly effective feature, allowing recurring entries like SSN or phone numbers to be easily managed. The ease of deployment across regions and the presence of a responsive support system further add to its value.

What needs improvement?

The timeout issue during server-side execution, specifically with loops, needs improvement. More features could be added to the data workflow, and there should also be enhancements in internal services, including updates and deletions.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have around two years of experience with Unqork.

What was my experience with deployment of the solution?

When they updated from the classic version to a new runtime version, it was challenging to adapt since the visual aspects and settings of data workflow changed.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

Occasionally, during server-side execution with multiple loops, we encounter timeout issues, which is something we've had to address with technical support.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

It appears to be scalable with frequent updates and technical improvements, and it is anticipated to be even more scalable in the future.

How are customer service and support?

I would rate Unqork's technical support as an eight. They are responsive to queries and issues.

How would you rate customer service and support?

Positive

How was the initial setup?

Setting up Unqork is straightforward with readily available resources like Unqork academy, training environment, and community for support. It provides ample documentation and video tutorials to guide new users.

What was our ROI?

Our team has managed to complete projects well ahead of client expectations, garnering positive feedback and extensions. Client satisfaction has resulted in increased project value.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

I have started learning OutSystems but do not have enough expertise to compare it with Unqork effectively.

What other advice do I have?

I recommend Unqork for those wanting to start their careers, particularly in sectors like insurance and banking. Unqork is frequently updated, offering opportunities with larger companies as it gains popularity. I would rate Unqork as a nine out of ten.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

Public Cloud

If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?

Other
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Flag as inappropriate
PeerSpot user
Associate Consultant at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees
Real User
Top 5
Roles and plugin features enable efficient data management and API interactions
Pros and Cons
  • "Unqork is stable."
  • "Unqork is pretty expensive compared to other tools like UiPath. The certification costs around $2000, which is ten times the price of UiPath."

What is our primary use case?

I have used Unqork for projects where I built multiple screens featuring both read-only and dynamic grids. I have also applied different roles to manage grid views for different personas. Additionally, I use Unqork for various purposes including creating web applications.

What is most valuable?

The plugin feature is the most valuable as it allows me to easily create APIs to interact with databases using plugins. The roles feature, specifically the rollback capability, is also valuable for controlling data visibility. Unqork's capabilities to easily send emails and create PDFs are additional features I appreciate.

What needs improvement?

The data workflow screen could be improved by increasing its size. Currently, the screen is small, making it difficult to work on larger data workflows since scrolling is required horizontally and vertically.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using Unqork for four years.

What was my experience with deployment of the solution?

Deployment is fairly good overall.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

Unqork is stable. I have never found any issues with stability.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

I have never worked on a huge amount of data, so I can't specifically say about scalability. However, I have not encountered any scalability problems.

How are customer service and support?

I don't know about the support team because there is a community to resolve doubts. I never had to connect with the support team as the community was enough to clear my doubts.

How would you rate customer service and support?

Neutral

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

Unqork is pretty expensive compared to other tools like UiPath. The certification costs around $2000, which is ten times the price of UiPath. This pricing can be a concern, especially for people in developing countries who may find it difficult to invest in certification without assurance of a job.

What other advice do I have?

If people are from IT, Unqork is easy to use with a bit of practice. However, non-IT people need more time to practice. I rate Unqork between eight to 8.5 out of ten for its stability.

If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?

Other
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer:
Flag as inappropriate
PeerSpot user
Software engineer 2 at Quantiphi
Real User
Top 20
Offers robust security and efficient API handling
Pros and Cons
  • "The features of Unqork that I find most valuable include its performance and security."
  • "Unqork is a great choice over other BPMS tools like Pega."
  • "The area that needs improvement in Unqork is its performance."
  • "The area that needs improvement in Unqork is its performance."

What is our primary use case?

My primary use case for Unqork involves working on module-based applications. My current project deals with API performance, particularly focused on manipulating data. Previously, I worked on workflow-based applications.

What is most valuable?

The features of Unqork that I find most valuable include its performance and security. The platform excels in security by providing proper authentication and authorization to users. It allows handling of API endpoints effectively. 

Performance-wise, Unqork facilitates connecting and configuring systems synchronously and efficiently. It is also capable of logging requests and responses, which is extremely beneficial.

What needs improvement?

The area that needs improvement in Unqork is its performance. Proper configuration and effective coding practices are needed to enhance performance. 

Additionally, there are some limitations with the grid functionality, specifically the View grid and Dynamic grid. The View grid is efficient, whereas the Dynamic grid could be improved for better performance and functionality such as pagination.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been working with Unqork for almost three years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

The stability of Unqork is relatively high, around eight out of ten. 

However, UI styling limitations with certain components like the View grid and Dynamic grid affect its accessibility.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

I rate the scalability of Unqork as eight out of ten. 

While I can get the necessary responses from technical support, they can take some time to resolve issues, mainly when dealing with Zendesk.

How are customer service and support?

Technical support from Zendesk is very reliable and effective. They are competent and provide timely resolutions to any issues faced.

How would you rate customer service and support?

Neutral

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

Before using Unqork, I worked with JavaScript. No specific solution was used before Unqork.

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup of Unqork is relatively easy, I would rate it at eight out of ten. 

Most challenges can be attributed to performance issues, which are manageable with regular updates and best practices.

What about the implementation team?

Deployment can be managed by one person, while ongoing maintenance needs a team of six to eight configurators along with a UI specialist.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

Unqork is very affordable, with a cost rating of three out of ten, making it a cost-effective and productive solution.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

No other solutions were evaluated before choosing Unqork.

What other advice do I have?

Unqork is a great choice over other BPMS tools like Pega. It's an opportunity worth considering for those in the field. 

I would rate the overall solution ten out of ten.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

On-premises
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Flag as inappropriate
PeerSpot user
Associate Software Engineer at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
Real User
No-code environment enables seamless application creation and modernizes systems
Pros and Cons
  • "The platform is a no-code environment, making it easy to create applications by dragging and dropping components."
  • "Unqork could benefit from allowing more flexibility in creating projects and extending them to other languages like JavaScript, Angular, or React."

What is our primary use case?

I worked for a client that was a bank, UBS. My responsibilities involved resolving application bugs, translating documents for Unqork, creating integrations, interfaces, workflows, and data flows.

What is most valuable?

The platform is a no-code environment, making it easy to create applications by dragging and dropping components. It allows easy workflow creation and integrates with external resources through API components, benefiting financial services and modernizing legacy systems.

What needs improvement?

Unqork could benefit from allowing more flexibility in creating projects and extending them to other languages like JavaScript, Angular, or React. While I understand the limitations of SaaS, such an option would be useful.

For how long have I used the solution?

I worked with Unqork for two years.

What was my experience with deployment of the solution?

Deploying new features and resolving bugs was straightforward. By accessing Unqork's administration part, I could transfer modules between development environments in about ten minutes.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

The solution is stable. However, performance may suffer with complex projects, leading to delays. Although stable, these delays can affect user experience during transactions due to multiple API connections.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

Unqork is scalable, with an ease of connecting through APIs. However, ensuring scalability requires following specific steps, or it might be compromised.

How are customer service and support?

Although I didn't interact directly with customer support, I found their community and documentation very helpful, providing detailed guidance on various tasks.

How would you rate customer service and support?

Neutral

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

Before Unqork, I worked with Siebel from Oracle, a CRM. Unqork is easier to work with due to its no-code platform.

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup of Unqork was straightforward, especially for creating user interfaces. It doesn't require configuring screen sizes, making it accessible on different devices easily.

What about the implementation team?

An additional team is not needed unless the project is large. In such cases, having developers and a cloud team focused on API development is beneficial.

What other advice do I have?

I would rate Unqork as an eight out of ten. I appreciate its low-code development features and ease of use, despite some performance issues and limited flexibility.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

Public Cloud

If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?

Other
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Flag as inappropriate
PeerSpot user
Tech Lead at a tech services company with 201-500 employees
Real User
Deployment process improves productivity but optimizations are needed in new features
Pros and Cons
  • "The technical support for Unqork is excellent, receiving a nine out of ten."
  • "There are areas in Unqork that need improvement. The ongoing development of the Vega feature, which is built on React compared to the older Century built on AngularJS, should be optimized."

What is our primary use case?

Our primary use case for Unqork includes working on projects in various domains. First, it was with ONHS related to the oncology healthcare department. Second, it was with UBS in the financial domain. Third, it involved Guardian Life, an insurance company based in America. Currently, we are working with Grayscale, a platform for digital coins investment like Bitcoin or Ethereum.

What is most valuable?

The deployment process of Unqork is highly valuable. The platform provides features such as grids to easily change the UI without writing extra code. Dynamic grids allow for changes without additional coding. The integration capabilities are also notable, with flexibility in using internal or external services for data storage. Unqork’s stability is commendable, with no bugs reported in the stable version. The DLC toolkit facilitates promoting projects with a single click, enhancing productivity.

What needs improvement?

There are areas in Unqork that need improvement. The ongoing development of the Vega feature, which is built on React compared to the older Century built on AngularJS, should be optimized. Vega promises faster experience, but it's still in progress. Additionally, there are limitations like showing a grid with a tree-like structure that Unqork currently cannot achieve.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been working with Unqork for five years. Although I have a total of eight years in software development, the first three were focused on Node.js.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

Unqork is very stable. With the Century version, I have not seen any bugs or instability in the last five years. However, users may encounter instability with the developing Vega feature as it is ongoing. Overall, I would rate the stability as ten out of ten.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

Unqork's scalability is good, and I would rate it as eight or nine out of ten. Its ease of use, minimal need for extra logic, and good integration capabilities make it significant.

How are customer service and support?

The technical support for Unqork is excellent, receiving a nine out of ten. I receive assurance that the team is addressing my issue within one to two hours, and I'll get a response within two working days.

How would you rate customer service and support?

Positive

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

Before Unqork, I worked with the MEAN stack, specifically Angular and Node.js. With Angular and Node.js, extra code was needed to manage data tables and deployment required setting up servers and using version control like Git. In contrast, Unqork simplifies these processes.

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup of Unqork is straightforward, and I would rate it eight or nine out of ten. Mastering the DWPF and dynamic grids is essential, which simplifies much of the setup. The community is active and responsive, enhancing the overall setup experience.

What other advice do I have?

Unqork has some limitations, so ensure your requirements are assessable before deciding. For new developers, focusing on workflow and data workflow is essential. I rate the overall solution as seven out of ten.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

Public Cloud

If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?

Other
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Flag as inappropriate
PeerSpot user
Performance Tester at a tech vendor with 201-500 employees
Real User
User-friendly platform enables seamless navigation and efficient performance testing
Pros and Cons
  • "Unqork is user-friendly and allows easy navigation for users without technical knowledge."

    What is our primary use case?

    I was a performance tester at Unqork for around one and a half years. I worked specifically with the Unqork dashboard application, thoroughly testing its performance and navigating different functionalities within the platform.

    What is most valuable?

    Unqork is user-friendly and allows easy navigation for users without technical knowledge. It provides the ability to renew policies after expiration without needing to recreate them. Once the application is fully developed, it becomes highly stable, allowing for effective performance testing. Its scalability is notable with low page load time, and it supports numerous functionalities easily.

    What needs improvement?

    I would like to see more detailed information on policies, as some are defined using technical language.

    For how long have I used the solution?

    I worked with Unqork for around one and a half years.

    What was my experience with deployment of the solution?

    During deployment, some code changes required me to rescript performance testing scripts, which is a standard practice whenever there is a change in code.

    What do I think about the stability of the solution?

    Unqork is stable once about 90% of the application is developed. Its stability improved significantly after the initial stages of development.

    What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

    Unqork's scalability is great. It loads pages quickly, even with numerous submission IDs and test data on the dashboard, which is advantageous.

    How are customer service and support?

    I reached out for Virtual Machines (VMs) needed for performance testing with 100 users. The interaction was helpful.

    How would you rate customer service and support?

    Neutral

    How was the initial setup?

    The initial setup involved working in a three-week sprint cycle with user stories. Deployment occurred every sprint, progressing from test to production stages.

    What about the implementation team?

    I was the only performance tester among six to seven developers, two leads, and two managers, along with three to four manual testers.

    What was our ROI?

    Unqork provided cost savings as I managed all performance testing tasks single-handedly.

    What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

    During rate and price calculations, when fields were entered and the calculate button clicked, the process initially took 18 seconds to load, but after resolving a bug, it took only 10 seconds.

    Which other solutions did I evaluate?

    I have not worked with any other no-code solutions apart from Unqork.

    What other advice do I have?

    I would recommend Unqork to others because it offers extensive functionalities and provides a good opportunity for learning. I rate Unqork nine out of ten overall.
    Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
    Flag as inappropriate
    PeerSpot user