Splunk Enterprise Security Reviews

My main use cases for Splunk Enterprise Security are detections and incident response.

An example of how these features have benefited my organization is that risk-based alerting has transformed our ability to reduce the number of detections that we have, streamline our observability into risks and threats in our environment, and really focus our analysts on actual real problems, helping to remove the noise and false positives to a large degree. It frees us up to do actual work.

The features of Splunk Enterprise Security that I prefer the most are risk-based alerting, the new Mission Control, and the integrations that are coming into place between Mission Control and Splunk SOAR.

Splunk Enterprise Security could be improved by having better role-based access controls. We need to be able to better control who can do what, which people can be allowed to take certain actions, run certain playbooks, or view specific items, and separate things between teams.

I have been using Splunk Enterprise Security for about 8 years.

I evaluate customer service and technical support as fantastic. Technical support is some of the best that I've worked with.

I work with a lot of different vendors, and Splunk support is very responsive and capable. They have very knowledgeable people who can deep dive into the details and understand the inner workings of the platform without having to engage developers or back-end people all the time; they can just deal with it because they know what they're doing.

Positive

I have also used Google Chronicle and the Google SecOps platform. The factors that led me to consider a change included the lack of maturity in the other product and the maturity of Splunk. Google SecOps doesn't have anywhere near the capabilities of the Splunk ecosystem.

The search capabilities in Splunk Enterprise Security, and Splunk in general, are far superior to the search capabilities in Google's products. Their automation platform was extraordinarily immature. It doesn't have many of the basic capabilities that you would expect in an enterprise-class platform, and Splunk does have that. The Splunk capabilities were just vastly superior.

I would describe my experience with deploying Splunk Enterprise Security as fairly straightforward.  We have detection engineers who know what they're doing, and so learning the detection platform in Splunk Enterprise Security was quick for them to pick up. Even those who were not familiar with Splunk Enterprise Security to begin with were able to pick that up quickly.

I have seen a return on investment with Splunk Enterprise Security.

I would rate it an eight out of ten.

My main use cases for Splunk Enterprise Security are event correlation and risk-based alerting.

The features I appreciate most about Splunk Enterprise Security are the different domains they have and the intelligence that comes along with each of those dashboards, being that single pane of glass for analysts to go in and look at. Splunk Enterprise Security has helped improve my organization's business resilience.

We use Cribl to pull data in and get it optimized before it hits Splunk Enterprise Security as far as collection. I have not done much customizing, developing, testing, deploying, and refining detections in Splunk Enterprise Security yet; we started off with just getting data in, and now we are at the point where we are starting to look at detections.

In Splunk Enterprise Security, I do not use risk-based alerting as much as we should. That goes back to the whole time issue, as we need to teach people what to do with it and how to tune them, and we do not have enough time in the day.

As for improvements to Splunk Enterprise Security, we will see how ES 8.2 looks. It is hard to say. We just found out about a bunch of changes, so it is difficult to make specific recommendations at this point.

The most significant challenges I face when using Splunk Enterprise Security for advanced threat detection include not having enough time to be in it, the resources and people to also be in there, and trying to configure it and teach people how to use it. A lack of resources prevents us from giving it the attention it needs.

I have been using Splunk Enterprise Security for two years.

I would assess the stability and reliability of Splunk Enterprise Security as good, as I have not had any issues with it. I have experienced downtime, crashes, or performance issues with Splunk Enterprise Security only once or twice when we have had to restart our Splunk instance, and it has taken three minutes and come right back, so nothing major.

Splunk Enterprise Security has not hit the point yet where we need to scale; we are still at the initial ingestion phase. We are in the process of expanding usage for Splunk Enterprise Security; we have not actually done it yet, as we are still planning and trying to get other teams involved while meeting their use cases, so we are probably a month away from that.

I would evaluate customer service and technical support for Splunk Enterprise Security as far better than anything else, giving it an eight out of ten, thanks to the response times they meet. When going to our account representatives, if we need something, they are always responsive and we get whatever we need.

Positive

The deployment was easy since we're cloud-based. We didn't really didn't have to do anything.

I have seen ROI with Splunk Enterprise Security. Just getting data in and being able to use the data and making sure it is compliant and mapping it to data models is far more efficient than any other SIM I have had experience with.

My experience with pricing, setup costs, and licensing for Splunk Enterprise Security is straightforward and self-explanatory. We are ingest-based, so we are not compute-based, making it pretty simple to get everything in without worrying about pricing.

Factors that led me to consider the change include shifting to a cloud-based solution at an affordable price and moving to something that is going to help reduce time spent on alerts and maintaining the system, with maintaining the system being probably the biggest reason since shifting to the cloud.

For the future of Splunk Enterprise Security, I would want the Edge Processor to be able to send to multiple destinations rather than just Splunk, though that is more about Observability.

The advice I would give to other organizations considering Splunk Enterprise Security is that everybody wants to drive a Ferrari, so get the Ferrari of SIMs.

I rate Splunk Enterprise Security ten out of ten.

Many of my use cases for Splunk Enterprise Security involve integrating with our networks and systems to troubleshoot and streamline our capabilities.

One of the features of Splunk Enterprise Security that I really enjoy is the ability to have the scalability of the product and the moldability that's really customized to meet our specific needs. 

The flexibility of Splunk Enterprise Security is beneficial, and that feature, while a broad statement, is crucial in itself, as it allows us to design our own environments with the flexibility and malleability needed to function effectively.

Splunk Enterprise Security's Risk-Based Alerting or RBA has been really amazing. We're still new at it, however, it's definitely nice to be able to have those results at your fingertips instead of having to search what you need to.

Using Splunk Enterprise Security's dashboards to communicate security posture to executives is probably one of the nicest things that Splunk offers. Not everyone is as skilled with the inner workings of the system as we are in my industry, so being able to put a visualization on there is critical.

The ability of Splunk Enterprise Security to ingest data has been amazing for our threat detection. Combating insider threats and advanced persistent threats is an amazing feature of Splunk Enterprise Security, and it gives us the visibility that we need for those detections that other software doesn't have.

The stability and reliability of Splunk Enterprise Security is outstanding. It's a software and product that anybody can really pick up and use.

I'm not as familiar as I should be to answer how Splunk Enterprise Security can be improved, however, one of the improvement points that Enterprise Security could offer is on-prem training, the availability to have a Splunk representative come out to different sites and actually sit down with the organizations and help them understand.

I've been using Splunk Enterprise Security for about a year to a year and a half now.

I handle most things in-house, however, I evaluate Splunk Enterprise Security's technical support and service as outstanding based on the few times we've had to contact them.

Positive

My experience with deploying Splunk Enterprise Security is that the deployment process is pretty straightforward, especially once you have the certifications and you understand how the process works. I'd say it goes back to the training opportunities; some people are unfamiliar with it, so a little bit of support would be appreciated sometimes.

Splunk Enterprise Security has definitely reduced the amount of time that it takes us to detect and respond. I would say the percentage lowered by using Splunk Enterprise Security is around 25 to 30%.

I understand how the pricing, the setup costs, and the licensing of Splunk Enterprise Security work, however, I personally don't have knowledge of the numerical values.

I'd give Splunk Enterprise Security a rating of ten out of ten. 

My advice to other companies considering Splunk Enterprise Security is to just do it. Don't look at any of the competitors; Splunk, hands down, is the product that I would recommend to other companies.

My main use cases for Splunk Enterprise Security are security, general security, and SIM.

The feature I appreciate the most in Splunk Enterprise Security is RBA. These features in Splunk Enterprise Security help my organization contextualize security alerts and put them in a framework that makes sense for our customers.

My organization uses risk-based alerting in Splunk Enterprise Security. Risk-based alerting in Splunk Enterprise Security supports my SOC by giving me a holistic view of what's happening and prioritizing alerts based on various risk factors that are important to me.

The most significant challenges I face when using Splunk Enterprise Security for advanced threat detection are zero-day events. I use disparate security solutions that integrate or import data into Splunk Enterprise Security. This integration supports my security operations by giving me a holistic view of what's happening in my environment. I find the process of customizing, developing, testing, deploying, and refining detections in Splunk Enterprise Security easier than other platforms.

On average, my security ops team takes fairly quickly to remediate security incidents with Splunk Enterprise Security, depending on the use case, minutes versus hours, compared to my previous solution, which was ArcSight.

Splunk Enterprise Security has helped improve my organization's business resilience.

My impressions of Splunk Enterprise Security's ability to predict, identify, and solve problems are good. I would say to other organizations considering Splunk Enterprise Security to solve your data challenges first and focus on data quality, and then everything else will work with your infrastructure.

Splunk Enterprise Security could be cheaper. More artificial intelligence implementation for features should be included in the next release of Splunk Enterprise Security.

I have been using Splunk Enterprise Security for nine years.

Splunk Enterprise Security is very reliable. I have not experienced any downtime, crashes, or glitches with Splunk Enterprise Security.

Splunk Enterprise Security scales efficiently with the growing needs of my organization. I have expanded usage, and the process was very smooth.

I would evaluate customer service and technical support as pretty good. There is a good community.

On a scale of one to ten, I would rate customer service an eight.

Positive

Prior to adopting Splunk Enterprise Security, I was using ArcSight to address similar needs.

I would describe my experience with deploying Splunk Enterprise Security as easy. I deploy it all the time, so it's easy for me.

I have seen a return on investment with Splunk Enterprise Security.

I don't deal with pricing, setup cost, and licensing mainly; however, everyone says it's pricey.

I was using ArcSight, and the factor to change was that it could not accept all the data.

On a scale of one to ten, I would rate Splunk Enterprise Security an eight.

My main use cases for Splunk Enterprise Security are insider threat, application security, incident response, and risk forecasting.

I appreciate the ability of Splunk Enterprise Security to tap into various network equipment and services on the network to pull it all into one place. That's my favorite feature.

The feature I've mentioned helps us in responding to incidents and disasters and different technical situations by being able to pull data from various sources and analyze it and take action.

Splunk Enterprise Security's Risk-Based Alerting, or RBA, has enabled us to prioritize and focus on the most critical threats and issues, while blocking out some of the noise and various information that can come from all these different sources.

Splunk Enterprise Security helps my SOC team prioritize and investigate high-fidelity alerts more effectively by enabling us to quickly gather information, collaborate, and provide various teams with access to the same information, allowing them to follow the workflow to complete the task.

Splunk Enterprise Security's ability to ingest and normalize data from diverse sources has enhanced our threat detection capabilities by making us aware of what's going on in the world, relating to our use cases and our threat tolerance, as we constantly pull in that information and brief everyone who has a stake.

Splunk Enterprise Security can improve in terms of being able to add to additional sources. They're adding many different ones, but as more cloud and data lakes emerge, being able to touch all those different new technologies that emerge together would be beneficial.

I assess the stability and reliability of Splunk Enterprise Security as very reliable and stable so far. We haven't had any glitches with testing out the first pilot use of it.

From my point of view, the biggest return on investment when using Splunk Enterprise Security is definitely being able to respond to incidents faster, adapt to future attacks by analyzing that information and doing risk-based management decisions, and also preparing for the future by looking at new technologies that can help us.

I'm not too involved with the pricing, the setup costs, and the licensing of the platform. It is pretty straightforward.

We just started turning on UEBA in our company, but we haven't really started utilizing it yet. There is a roadmap to try to do some of that stuff from the program side, and we just have to get access to it once the enterprise is ready to implement it and hand it over to the program office.

Even though we just started using UEBA, it's very useful, and it helps us set a bar for what normal activity is, and then it sets alerts and gives us awareness for anything that's out of the norm in terms of normal user behavior and the data that's being accessed.

My advice to other companies considering Splunk Enterprise Security is that you should definitely look into it, get your folks a proof of concept and try it out, send folks to training, and let them learn about it, and see how it can help you be better at securing your environment.

I rate Splunk Enterprise Security nine out of ten.

My main use cases for Splunk Enterprise Security are threat alerts.

The feature I appreciate the most about Splunk Enterprise Security is the dashboard. It has supported my SOC by making their job easier regarding notifications. It also reduces the time they have to spend using other tools to help them out, cutting down on their workload.

When it comes to incidents, we are able to detect, monitor, and handle incidents that come in. We can take those incidents and correlate them to other tools that we use. It serves as our single pane of focus.

Our security ops team's remediation time with Splunk Enterprise Security is measured in minutes. One notable improvement has been the maturation of our SOC, which now features a single pane of glass for incident viewing.

The correlation of events is the most significant challenge I face when using Splunk Enterprise Security for advanced threat detection. I am still looking at version 8 to see how it can be improved or how we can utilize it better.

I have been using Splunk Enterprise Security for three years.

I assess the stability and reliability of Splunk Enterprise Security as having some issues because we have problems with our SC4S. We are working through it. There are some things that we need to troubleshoot, but we are addressing those.

It is easy to scale Splunk Enterprise Security, and the plan is to expand it, however, we are in the planning stages right now. My experience with scaling has been smooth.

I evaluate customer service and technical support as good, with no issues.

On a scale of one to ten, I would rate customer service and technical support an eight.

Positive

My experience with pricing, setup costs, and licensing is that they are expensive and growing, but that is really above my level. Our C suite handles more of the pricing aspects.

I find the process for customizing, developing, testing, deploying, and refining detections in Splunk Enterprise Security not overly complicated because we use Splunk resources to help us with this. It is not as challenging as we would think it would be.

I have seen a return on investment with Splunk Enterprise Security.

I use other security solutions that integrate or import data into Splunk Enterprise Security such as CrowdStrike, Proofpoint, and a threat intel platform called ThreatConnect.

My advice to other organizations considering Splunk Enterprise Security is to weigh their options, but I would definitely recommend it.

On a scale of one to ten, I rate Splunk Enterprise Security an eight.

My use cases for Splunk Enterprise Security are extensive in production. I utilize it for all available functions including observability, asset management, vulnerability management, threat detection, network security, identity management, and various other capabilities.

The solution does require a lot of customization for an organization. 

It is highly customizable, which is a significant advantage. It requires substantial customization and tailoring to particular organization requirements, meaning that out of the box, most features would need configuration.

The risk and notables component, particularly the two-tier system of picking something from risk into the notable, is one of the most problematic features. 

The GUI, now called Mission Control, which serves as issue management or ticket management, falls below what would be considered industry standards.

AI assistance for security analysts to analyze notables and risks needs improvement. Although it exists, the demonstration is not yet sufficient for the required level. We need this as soon as possible to help security analysts. 

Splunk Enterprise Security is not cloud environment-friendly, especially when dealing with large cloud infrastructures. With significant AWS presence and multiple clouds, collecting asset data is challenging. The AWS add-on is particularly problematic, with most inputs requiring manual writing due to lack of out-of-box functionality.

Regarding the platform and Enterprise Security specifically, the lack of Git-friendly or Git-native integration is problematic. The recently introduced content management system is inadequate, attempting to implement an outdated concept of storing rule versions in an index while teams work with Git natively.

The storage of queries in savedsearches.conf prevents efficient work with query text. It should be structured as separate SPL files that can utilize intellectual add-ons for Visual Studio Code and work natively with GitHub. Content management is limited to applications within the Enterprise Security suite, excluding custom applications not starting with SA or DA.

I have been using Splunk Enterprise Security for more than five years.

The product is generally stable and forgiving.

When considering Enterprise Security in particular, it demonstrates good scalability.

I contacted their technical support recently. The support provided is decent, though they often reference their knowledge base. For publicly available solutions, this can be redundant as these solutions can be found through internet searches. Support becomes valuable when dealing with issues requiring access to their closed knowledge base for faster responses.

While support provides solutions, implementation can be complex. In a recent case, the provided solution was so complex to implement that I decided not to proceed. The support staff themselves are highly knowledgeable, polite, and responsive, with some being exceptional. The support team deserves a perfect score.

Positive

I have experience with similar solutions such as AlienVault and ArcSight, each with its advantages and disadvantages. The recommendation depends on the working environment. For cloud-native and GitHub-native organizations, the Enterprise Security solution should align with those principles.

I was solely responsible for the implementation.

It was one of the most difficult deployments I've ever handled. After we set up a cluster with consultants, we made it usable after a year and a half. 

Splunk Enterprise Security requires continuous maintenance, consuming approximately 50% of the time. The numerous data sources and constantly changing formats and source types demand ongoing work on data quality, detection rules, assets, and identities.

People are delegated for platform administration, though they currently need additional time to reach optimal performance levels.

We did work with consultants during the deployment. 

The pricing is currently managed by procurement. Even with substantial company discounts, it remains extremely expensive. This creates internal challenges when teams independently choose open-source or less expensive solutions for log dumping. Duplicating application logs becomes costly as teams may already use DataDog, ELK stack, Elasticsearch, or S3.

With data ingestion of two terabytes or more daily, Splunk Enterprise Security costs become significant. Cloud-native solutions, particularly in AWS, make it more practical to use native security detection mechanisms such as Security Hub, GuardDuty, and Inspector, using Splunk Enterprise Security as a data aggregator.

Many users prefer pre-processing data before ingestion using the Databricks platform for large data sources such as cloud trail logs. The on-premises pricing model based on data ingestion affects Splunk Enterprise Security's market position.

This product requires significant investment in learning as it is not easily understood. Organizations purchasing the solution should expect 6-12 months with a dedicated team before meaningful insights can be delivered.

On a scale from one to ten, Splunk Enterprise Security rates as a seven.

We use Splunk Enterprise Security for security monitoring purposes, and we have many security use cases configured to detect cybersecurity-related risks. We have 100+ use cases related to brute force attacks, ransomware, credential access attacks, et cetera.

We use it for the extra security layer since we want to be very proactive and monitor our infrastructure fully end-to-end.

We now have a single platform where we can visualize our entire landscape. It's improved our security posture. We can see all the logs getting ingested, and if there are any anomalies, we're able to visualize that as well. The alerts help us be very proactive. We used to miss a few things happening in our organization. Now we get alerts on time. 

The best features I've experienced over the past six years with Splunk Enterprise Security are the ability to create use cases and the flexibility to customize searches and use cases based on our specific requirements. 

It's user-friendly. You don't need to be an expert to create a use case. Even a basic understanding will allow you to do the work. There are lots of knowledge articles as well. 

From a visibility perspective, the solution has significantly improved our organization by providing a single platform to visualize our entire IT landscape. This has also enhanced our security posture by enabling us to view all logs.

We do connect with a Splunk representative on a monthly basis. They can proactively provide us with solutions. 

Regarding room for improvement, I expect Splunk to provide information about new features on a regular basis, such as notifications about enhancements that may improve security posture. I want these notifications to come to us quite regularly, as we always want to improve our security posture. 

I'm interested in the notifications and alerts aspect, particularly since Splunk Enterprise Security's Mission Control feature was very proactive when it was rolled out.

I have been using Splunk Enterprise Security for the last six years.

I would rate the stability at eight out of ten; we never had any gap in monitoring. That said, there were instances of backend issues that did not impact our monitoring.

It is a scalable solution for our business, and I would rate it nine out of ten, as we have recently scaled it to monitor operational use cases.

I would rate the technical support as nine out of ten. They are always on top of resolving issues, providing technical account manager details for further assistance. 

Positive

We had tried IBM QRadar and Azure Sentinel previously.

If I need to set up Splunk from scratch, I don't have to do a lot of planning. It's pretty straightforward. 

It took about a month to deploy Splunk Enterprise Security, as we took many days to plan how to set up the architecture.

There is some maintenance required once it is set up.

The IT team exclusively uses Splunk Enterprise Security for assistance. The team is always there to assist.

I don't deal with pricing. I have a fair understanding based on the market research; from what I've witnessed, the pricing is competitive.

I rate Splunk Enterprise Security higher due to its user-friendliness. That is something on top of my list. 

Splunk Enterprise Security is on top in terms of how users or administrators can manage it. Everything else looks pretty fine regarding the support we get from Splunk Enterprise Security. 

I would rate Splunk Enterprise Security overall as eight out of ten.