Snyk SAST/DAST - Complexity Compared
Have you tried solutions that include SAST and DAST? If yes, how would you assess their complexity and did that affect developer adoption? How would you compare their complexity and developer adoption to this solution (ie. to Snyk)?
Snyk should improve the scanning capabilities for other languages. For example, Veracode is strong with different languages such as Java, C#, and others. However, Snyk performs better at mobile source code scanning compared to Veracode. If both capabilities were combined, that would be exceptional. As we are moving toward GenAI, we expect Snyk to leverage AI features to improve code scanning findings.
View full review »Technically, we have better vulnerabilities detection in Checkmarx and Veracode. Both of them are more precise about vulnerabilities detection. Snyk is slightly less effective, but this is something they can improve on in the future.
View full review »Earlier, I used Checkmarx, which is another SAST tool. By default, any company and any SAST tool like Checkmarx or Snyk provides a plugin. We are also using a separate DAST tool, though I am not aware of the tool name as it is managed by a different team.
View full review »


