Snyk False Positive Rate
What is your impression of the solution’s false positive rate and how does it affect your development activities?
Abhishek-Goyal
Software Engineer at a computer software company with 11-50 employees
Although Snyk is strong, sometimes it flags vulnerabilities that are not reachable, not exploitable, and not relevant to a project. Better reachability analysis and context-aware scanning could improve this.
Although Snyk is strong, sometimes it flags vulnerabilities that are not reachable, not exploitable, and not relevant to a project. Better reachability analysis and context-aware scanning could improve this.
Although Snyk is strong, sometimes it flags vulnerabilities that are not reachable, not exploitable, and not relevant to a project.
View full review »Learn More: Other Topics:
- SDE Integration
- Time-to-Value
- SAST/DAST - Complexity Compared
- Ease of Use
- Find/Fix Vulnerabilities
- Vulnerability Database
- Time to Detect
- Overall Application Security
- False Positive Rate
- Developer Productivity
- Which software is ideal for code quality and security?
- How does Snyk compare with SonarQube?
- How do you use Snyk for running SAST?
- What do I scan when changing code in Snyk?
- If you had to both encrypt and compress data during transmission, which would you do first and why?
- When evaluating Application Security, what aspect do you think is the most important to look for?
- What are the threats associated with using ‘bogus’ cybersecurity tools?
- What are the Top 5 cybersecurity trends in 2022?
- Which application security solutions include both vulnerability scans and quality checks?
- We're evaluating Tripwire, what else should we consider?
Buyer's Guide
Download our free Snyk Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros
sharing their opinions.
