Omada Access Points Reviews

We use Omada Access Points for the network and Wi-Fi.

The solution takes a long time to switch to another connection, which should be improved. The solution’s stability and performance should be improved.

I have been working with Omada Access Points for more than one year.

I rate Omada Access Points a seven out of ten for stability.

Omada Access Points is a scalable solution. Around 20 users use Omada Access Points in our organization.

We may increase the number of users if there's a possibility to deploy the solution supporting a greater number of users.

The solution's initial setup is very straightforward.

The solution's deployment takes 30 minutes to one hour. We follow the product manual for the solution's deployment. The deployment team has the technical knowledge to deploy routers. We can implement the solution remotely.

We don't have to pay for the license because the solution has no subscription cost.

Beginners or small businesses can use Omada Access Points, but I cannot recommend it for enterprise-level businesses.

Overall, I rate Omada Access Points a seven out of ten.

We primarily use the solution for SMB users to cover areas for WiFi. It can be used in homes and businesses. It's not ideal for larger applications.

The stability is very good.

It is easy to set up.

The pricing is reasonable. 

It's better for smaller organizations. This would not work for enterprises. It is not very scalable. 

We're like to have more visibility in terms of who is connecting to the service. That would help us to monitor bandwidth more effectively.

I've used the solution for a few years. 

The solution is stable and reliable. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. 

It is not extremely scalable. It's more suitable for smaller setups. YOu can also just have a limited number of users. The more users on it, the lower quality of the connection.

We have five or six people on the product right now. 

We did not contact technical support in the past.

We did use a solution previously. However, that was a long time ago.

The initial setup is pretty simple. It's very plug-and-play. You just set up everything and connect everything to the LAN.

It took me about half an hour to deploy it. We can set up some parameters, and you are done. 

You don't really need anyone to handle maintenance. It's a small setup.

We can handle the setup ourselves. It's pretty easy if you just follow the guidance in order to set up the solution. It helps if you have a bit of knowledge. 

It is not expensive. At this time, I don't have a license for it. I don't need to pay for licensing. 

I'm not sure of the exact version of the solution we're using. 

I'd recommend the solution to others. The solution is reasonably priced, stable, and easy to deploy.

I'd rate the solution eight out of ten.

I am using TP-Link Auranet EAP for connecting multiple networks and devices at the same time.

The most valuable feature of TP-Link Auranet EAP is its high performance.

There should be more remote support for the mobile application.

I have been using TP-Link Auranet EAP for approximately four years.

TP-Link Auranet EAP is stable.

The solution is salable. However, I have only used it personally at home. There are five to six people using the solution in my home.

I have not contacted the support from TP-Link Auranet EAP.

I have used other solutions prior to using TP-Link Auranet EAP. This solution is quicker and has a capable mobile application to monitor changes and settings.

The initial setup was simple and took one day to do.

I did the deployment of the solution myself.

The price of the solution is not a lot for five people to use it.

I rate TP-Link Auranet EAP a nine out of ten.

I use the tool in my network support. 

The solution's most valuable feature is its price. 

Aruba has better scaling capabilities. 

I have been using the product for a year. 

My company has one access point since it is small. 

I haven't contacted the tool's technical support yet. 

The tool's deployment is easier since it has a mobile application. 

The cost is about 500 Brazilian real per access point, with no additional recurring costs.

I would recommend the product due to its pricing. I rate it a five out of ten. However, I believe that Aruba is better than Omada Access Points. Aruba is also good for scaling but expensive, while Omada Access Points is better for small companies. 

Currently we are using it for our mobile users, the users that always carry mobile devices and some laptop users but very few. TP Link is just good for them, we also use it for guest access.

As a consumer of TP Link, they don't have any boosting or unique features. All features are common features for any business solutions, its benefit is that it is cost effective.

The quality of the hardware needs to be improved.

I would say the stability of this product is normal.

It is easy to use, and easy to configure. 

When choosing a a solution for our company, we focus on two things:

• Business Support
• Price

We have tried other products but they are too expensive, and not in our budget. The only option for us is TP Link.

It has all the common solutions that all other solutions provide. But it is very effective, I was planning to go for Ruckus, but its cost is 60% less than Ruckus. In our region, for Ruckus I have to pay $15,000 to have 25 access points. For TP Link I just need $5,000. So, you can see the level of difference.

Our goal is for the people of Dhaka to be able to have WiFi from their mobile devices, and this is why we are using TP-Link Auranet EAP.

TP-Link Auranet EAP is not very efficient, they need to improve it.

I used TP-Link Auranet EAP within the last 12 months.

We have not been satisfied with the performance of TP-Link Auranet EAP.

The coverage of TP-Link Auranet EAP is very low, it is approximately 45 meters.

We had approximately 200 people using the solution.

The initial setup is not complicated. However, mounting the device is not simple.

I would not recommend this solution to others.

I rate TP-Link Auranet EAP a seven out of ten.