Microsoft Visual Studio Reviews

I mainly use Visual Studio for mobile app development and searching libraries or different kinds of programming language.

The most valuable feature is how smoothly it runs.

Microsoft should add more visualization for analytical studies or research.

I've been using Visual Studio for one to two years.

Visual Studio is stable.

I've not found Visual Studio to be scalable.

The initial setup is a little complex - after installing Visual Studio, you may need to download the particular libraries you want to work with from their repository. Installation took around two to three hours.

You may have to purchase more hardware utilities like processors or RAM.

I would recommend Visual Studio to other users and would rate it nine out of ten.

Visual Studio is a tool used for custom software development. It covers everything under this umbrella, including architecture for automation testing. We have between 60 and 70 users working with Visual Studio.

I've been using Microsoft Visual Studio for 10 years.

Visual Studio is stable enough. There have been some issues but not very often. 

Visual Studio is a development environment. It only runs on one computer. Everyone has their own installation. If we talk about the cloud version, it's scalable. It has served our needs. We plan to increase usage by 5 to 10 percent as our departments grow. 

I have been using Microsoft Visual Studio since .NET first came out. Prior to that, I used tools with other software development languages like Eclipse. Eclipse was an IDE-independent software vendor. 

Installing Visual Studio is easy on average. Sometimes you need to install various libraries, so it depends on your setup. I would say it's medium difficulty.

I rate Microsoft Visual Studio nine out of 10. 

Visual Studio makes it easier to compile the code and shows me the errors upfront when coding. For example, it will tell me when a reference is incorrect or if there's a mistake within the function calls. I like how it highlights with a red underline so that I know there's an error at that point.

I would like to see Visual Studio improve reporting to give us more details on failures. When there are failures, it's difficult to debug. It would be helpful to have more error information to help us to identify the issue and resolve it. I want to know more about software failures and exceptions in the system.

I've been working with Microsoft Visual Studio for around six months.

Visual Studio is quite stable.

Visual Studio is scalable. I can install the latest modules and run my software through them.

Microsoft support is good enough, though sometimes it could be more responsive.

I've been using CLion IDE on Linux. It's good, but Visual Studio is more intuitive, and Microsoft offers better support. 

Visual Studio is straightforward. It was easy to set up and use.

I rate Microsoft Visual Studio seven out of 10. 

We like Visual Studio because you can choose the different types of languages, like JavaScript. I think it's better than the other solutions I used.

The interface could be more user friendly. 

I've been working with Visual Studio for about two years.

Yeah. Stable.

I think it's good.

Microsoft support is quite responsive to our questions.

I used Sublime before. 

Straightforward

We use the solution for development purposes.

The solution is a very good tool. I like the performance, stability and ease of use. 

I would like to see more tools in the next release. 

Since Microsoft Visual Studio comprises the core of Microsoft development, we have been making use of it for 15 years. 

I like the solution's stability. 

The technical support is fine. 

We have no need for deployment, as this can be handled by the individual user. 

The solution is a free tool.

The solution is deployed both on-premises and in the cloud. 

I cannot think of features which should be included in the next release, as they already upgrade the solution on their own. 

The solution is a very good product. There is no need for better integration. 

All of our customers use the solution. It is on a desktop application. We have around 40 developers.

I would definitely recommend the solution to others. 

I rate Microsoft Visual Studio as a nine out of ten. 

We use the solution to develop web applications. I'm a programmer specialist II and we're customers of Visual Studio. 

I think the code management is the most convenient and valuable new feature. Deployment of the solution is also a very smooth process.

I think the file installations could be improved because they're very heavy and I'd like to see the solution support Python for developing purposes. 

I've been using this solution for three years. 

In the previous versions, the product wasn't so stable, but in this latest 2019 version they have fixed the issue and it's now a stable solution. 

The scalability is good in this solution. We have about five developers in the company using it on a regular basis. 

I'm very satisfied with the support. 

It is easy to install, the only issue being that it takes up a lot of memory. We had two people involved with the deployment and implementation took a few days. We didn't use any consultants, we just followed the documentation.

This is a simple product to use and the best advice I can give is to follow the documentation. 

I would rate this solution an eight out of 10. 

Our primary use case of this solution is to develop and maintain the main programs of the company for which we work.

I really like the distributed software programming on the Windows platform and also we need to develop on this platform since the company's computers work with the Windows network. I like that I don't need any additional software to develop on this platform.

I haven't had any issues with the stability of this solution.

I believe the solution is scalable and we can increase our number of developers. We currently have 15 users. 

We don't really use technical support. Whenever we have an issue, we search on the internet for a solution. 

We used other solutions before, but we decided to switch to Microsoft Visual Studio because it is the best solution for developing the Windows platform. We considered using Delphi Solutions, but few people were familiar with the platform, so we chose Visual Studio. More people use Visual Studio.

The solution comes at a good price and, even though there are free versions out there on the market, I still prefer this product because I like its interface.

My advice to others is to simply install it and use it. I am really satisfied with this solution. My rating is eight out of ten. In the next version, I would like to see a better development tool. The current Mobile Application Development is very integrated.

Our primary use case of this solution is for performance testing.

The feature I find most valuable is the fact that it's broad-spectrum, so it can be used for a wide variety of technologies. We are predominately .NET based and we use mostly .NET Core or .NET Framework so I can call in any immediate packages.

I would only say the deployment outline can be improved. We have shifted away from using Team Foundation Server, because it didn't work for our company. We shifted over to the Git approach and I do know that the Team Foundation Server has Git support. But we decided to rather go with GitLab as our main platform. 

In terms of more support I would like to have the ability to plug into other open source pools. I know that it's focused towards the whole Microsoft Suite so it's more geared towards the Team Foundation Server, but if they can add more support to pools, that would be great.

In terms of stability, it really works for us. There are drawbacks to every solution out there, it's built into it. Our company is stripped across using Visual Studio. Some of the architects use Visual Studio Code so they don't really need an extent of IDE. They have a nice cut of IDE using Visual Studio Code. In terms of stability, I don't think we have shifted away from Visual Studio at all. It will always remain our IDE tool of choice.

With Microservice Architecture it has become very easy for us to scale out. I think it's more about the way that we handle scale. The tool allows it. I would say the hardships comes with the planning for scale, as opposed to the actual tool accommodating itself. We have about 1500 users on Visual Studio and then we have a small team dedicated to the maintenance of the deployment. 

The technical team at Microsoft is known for their fast response time.

We utilized a bunch of templates for the initial setup instead of going through the trials and tribulations of setting up everything at once. 

I would highly recommend this solution. They've really gone the 9-mile to accommodate not only corporate or big companies, but small, single users to utilize the community issue or business vehicle, and to develop and build on application. I would highly recommend it to anyone. In the next version, I would like to see systems like Juta as well as more testing tools. There's a massive automation drive, anything in terms of more out of the box automation features for Selenium, or ACRONYM, or automation tools like that. I rate this program ten out of ten.