Microsoft Visual Studio Reviews

I use the product to develop software. 

The tool is good for interactive testing. It has good integrations and works well for remote services. The product also has features for collaborative work where it allows others to control my screen. It has a good community for every language. 

I have faced configuration issues with Microsoft Visual Studio. 

I have been using the solution for two years. 

The solution is stable. 

I would rate Microsoft Visual Studio's scalability an eight out of ten. 

I haven't reached out to the tool's support. 

Microsoft Visual Studio's setup is straightforward. It is easy to download the solution and you need to allow permissions depending on whether you are a Mac or Windows user.  

I use Microsoft Visual Studio's free version. 

I would rate the tool a nine out of ten. 

We use the solution to check Azure codes and other things like ARM templates.

It has perfect integration into Microsoft. It goes straight to Azure, and it is massive. It can get very complicated, but because our customers use it, we need to work with them and discuss certain aspects of automation and security settings.

We recently started using this solution because specific customers found value in us having it. A particular customer uses the latest version, and we use it to automate the rollout of servers into Azure. We use it to specify that the scripts are working properly.

It is stable and running locally, so we didn't have any issues.

It's scalable. We are running it on a server, so it isn't in the cloud.

We are a Microsoft gold partner, but the technical support can be slow.

We currently also use GitHub.

The initial setup was very easy. After that, the deployment did not take a long time. For our test environment, it took a morning to enter everything, get the code and start working on it with the customer.

I rate this solution a nine out of ten.

I work as a developer. I code in it using Microsoft Visual Studio.

Basically everything. It's a useful integrated development environment.

It is easy to use.

It is simple to use for me.

It is simple to use for most developers and nearly impossible to use for non-developers.

For the last 10 to 20 years, I've been using various versions of Microsoft Visual Studio.

I am working with the latest version.

Microsoft Visual Studio is a stable solution.

Scalability does not apply to the solution.

I am the only user in my company.

It's good. Again, I'm using the community edition, which is the free version. It's an open-source, free version. It lacks support because I am not paying anything. I'm getting help from various public forums and community websites.

I am familiar with Google Chrome, Gmail, and Visual Studio. I now own a small company that does some development. I am a one-man operation.

I am working with the open-source community version, which is free.

I would recommend this solution to others who are interested in using it.

I would rate Microsoft Visual Studio a nine out of ten.

I am a DevOps engineer. I work from Ecuador for clients around LatAm, principally banks. I work with the banks that use DevOps continuous integration and continuous deployment. I also work with Visual Studio.

Windows Presentation Foundation or WPF is valuable. It's a tool to give clients a user interface for Windows applications. The summary for mobile applications is also very useful.

You need a lot of RAM to run the applications with Visual Studio and Unity. For example, if you want to do work on a game, you need a lot of resources or RAM for Visual Studio and Unity.

There could be some features related to Azure DevOps. There could be some features for YAML pipelines in Visual Studio.

I have been using this solution for 14 years.

We can find a lot of information on the internet when we have any issues.

I would rate it a 10 out of 10.