Microsoft Visual Studio Reviews

The most valuable features of Microsoft Visual Studio are the database connections.

Microsoft Visual Studio can improve memory management, and packaging and reporting components.

I have been using Microsoft Visual Studio for approximately five years.

Microsoft Visual Studio is stable.

Microsoft Visual Studio is not scalable because it is a stand-alone solution.

We have two people using this solution in my organization.

The support from Microsoft is not the best, but it is above average. They are sometimes slow to respond.

The initial setup of Microsoft Visual Studio is easy. The time it took was approximately half an hour.

I did the implementation of Microsoft Visual Studio myself.

We have received a return on investment using Microsoft Visual Studio.

The price of Microsoft Visual Studio could be lowered. For a single developer, it is approximately $1,000.

I rate Microsoft Visual Studio a seven out of ten.

We use it for coding purposes and to integrate the code with the other code. It's helpful to know what bugs are in there.

I like that it works fine and that it performs better than competing products. I'm very happy with Microsoft Visual Studio.

It would be better if it didn't get stuck. Sometimes when we are writing code, we open too many tabs and modules, and it gets stuck.

I have been using Microsoft Visual Studio for about four years.

Microsoft Visual Studio is a stable solution.

Microsoft Visual Studio is a scalable solution.

The initial setup is straightforward. It's not that complex. You can push or pull the code very quickly with some commands. The deployment time depends on how much code you are writing and the internet speed. It won't take much time. For me, on average, we write the code in the morning, and we submit that to the cloud at the end of the day. This takes hardly 15 to 20 minutes.

We use the free version, and you don't need a license. 

Compared to other platforms, this is the best one. I use Python and Anaconda for Python-related things. So, compared to these, I found Visual Studio to be far better as we can install with all the requirements. We can install most of the other things there. 

I would recommend this solution to potential users.

On a scale from one to ten, I would give Microsoft Visual Studio a nine.

Visual Studio is a tool used for custom software development. It covers everything under this umbrella, including architecture for automation testing. We have between 60 and 70 users working with Visual Studio.

I've been using Microsoft Visual Studio for 10 years.

Visual Studio is stable enough. There have been some issues but not very often. 

Visual Studio is a development environment. It only runs on one computer. Everyone has their own installation. If we talk about the cloud version, it's scalable. It has served our needs. We plan to increase usage by 5 to 10 percent as our departments grow. 

I have been using Microsoft Visual Studio since .NET first came out. Prior to that, I used tools with other software development languages like Eclipse. Eclipse was an IDE-independent software vendor. 

Installing Visual Studio is easy on average. Sometimes you need to install various libraries, so it depends on your setup. I would say it's medium difficulty.

I rate Microsoft Visual Studio nine out of 10. 

We use it for development of internal software projects. I am satisfied with it.

We can easily build solutions with this tool and we can get help from many other resources.

It's a universal solution. I like that I can easily find software developers for it. I can easily find staff on Microsoft forums. Also, we have other components that are running on top of Visual Studio. I like that it is open to other platforms. Finally, there are many many resources for Microsoft Visual Studio and I can easily find support. There is a large knowledge base for it as well.

I would like to see support for rapid application development. For example, if I am developing a new project, I am repeating many similar steps again and again and again. But the platform could do this easily, instead of me. It would save me time. This is something I would like to have in Microsoft Visual Studio, to have it take over repetitive tasks from me.

It's a stable solution.

Scalability is fine.

Technical support is good.

The switch depended on a cost-benefit analysis. It was positive for me.

In this type of solution, application development, there are only a few possibilities. One of them is Microsoft. Another one is Delphi. We chose between just these two solutions. Microsoft was very dominant.

I rate it an eight out of 10 because, as I said earlier, it could have more options to speed up development by handling repetitive tasks. But I would recommend Visual Studio.

When selecting a vendor I look at support and the name of the company.

We use the solution to write and develop program language and websites.

The solution is user-friendly.

The solution's setup process could be more straightforward.

I have been using the solution for ten years. At present, I use its latest version.

I rate the solution's stability above ten.

We have around 500 solution users in our organization. I rate its scalability above ten.

The solution's initial setup process is complex. It takes a day to complete.

We took help from a consultant to implement the solution.

The solution is worth the investment.

We pay for the solution's license. It could be cheaper.

The solution has good stability and performance. I recommend it to others and rate it a six out of ten. I advise others to understand the process before implementing it.

I use the reporting portion of Microsoft Visual Studio.

I would like to have more integration with other platforms and technologies.

I have been using Microsoft Visual Studio for about two years now.

I have found that it is scalable. We have some old products and we have a standard expansion platform. As far as scalability goes, I have done a lot of work with access and reporting, finding ways to upgrade the old systems and old platforms, with some newer versions, or migrate to other systems. 

I use technical support for database questions.

I would rate Microsoft Visual Studio an eight out of ten.

We like Visual Studio because you can choose the different types of languages, like JavaScript. I think it's better than the other solutions I used.

The interface could be more user friendly. 

I've been working with Visual Studio for about two years.

Yeah. Stable.

I think it's good.

Microsoft support is quite responsive to our questions.

I used Sublime before. 

Straightforward

My primary business is designing architecture, and I use Visual Studio to demonstrate how to use VS code in the browser. For example, if someone has a business idea for a banking application and is starting to think about how to develop it, they can use Visual Studio to make a very quick prototype. The pipelines then deliver this project to the new environment, and the end-user can see how quickly the application works.

Visual Studio improves communication between teams, which saves valuable time.

The most valuable feature is the lightweight cross-platform support and the robust architecture. You can easily create, edit, and test any software and develop applications for all the major platforms, including cloud, desktop, and mobile.

Visual Studio could be improved with the ability to personalize the interface and development style and to edit extension requirements.

Visual Studio is a very good, very convenient, very powerful development solution. I would rate it as nine out of ten.