LogRhythm SIEM Reviews

The Web Console, and digging in through the logs.

We use a single appliance, around 5,000 MPS. We're a Windows shop, so mostly Windows servers, desktops, workstations, etc. Somewhat distributed as well, we have three main sites and 20 or so distributed sites as well.

Our key challenges are, mostly people, getting more resources, and the goal is just get better. Are we better today than we were yesterday?

I think it has helped immensely. I think the ability to quickly receive an alert and investigate that alert is pretty beneficial. I think it is pretty effective.

Also, the ability to remediate alerts with partial scripts is pretty good.

I would definitely like to see more things in the Web Console, in terms of the ability to run reports and generate reports out of it, and schedule those. Instead of having to go to the FAT client, you would just do it out of the Web Console.

Right now there are two brains, there are the Web Console and the FAT console so that hinders a little bit of flexibility or innovation that they can do. It is a tough spot to be in, but otherwise it is a pretty good product.

In terms of just stability of the product, sometimes we have run into some issues there.

In our environment, we have X number of clients, so that's not extremely scalable, but I know that the solution is pretty scalable.

Support has been really good.

We were using Splunk prior to this but it was too expensive and we needed a true SIEM solution.

A little complex, but usually any SIEM is; just all the components that are in that one appliance.

I am pretty impressed with it. I have seen a it grow, just in the short time that we have had it.

It is very important for us that a solution be a unified, end-to-end platform. That is one of the biggest driving factors, having a single place that I can do network monitoring if we wanted to. We could do log correlation out of different security tools that we have.

Make sure you give it enough resources in terms of users. Somebody to manage it, whether that be a MSSP or in-house resource.

We have 10 hospitals or so throughout Minnesota, and a lot of clinics and smaller health facilities. The technology stack is mostly Microsoft based. We do about 25,000 MPS.

Key challenge is just protecting PHI, personal healthcare information, that's a challenge in our industry. Patient care comes first, even before security. Then also, healthcare is a bit behind the loop. It's a large organization, we've got over 30,000 end points.

Just like any SIEM product, LogRhythm gives you a lot of insight into your organization. The web UI has been particularly helpful for our analysts and our budding SOC program. Being able to give them a nice kind of sexy layout, dashboard. And the reporting is great for management.

Then there are all the "cobwebs" that we're discovering, that LogRhythm gives us insight into.

We can't feed it fast enough, is basically what it comes down to. It's given us a ton of insight that we didn't have before. It's been magic.

The functionality of it. It definitely does a lot of things out of the box. You don't have to do a ton of tweaking and tuning, but that's there for you if you want it. Big-time usability and implementation is easy.

Maybe it's just my lack of understanding of it, but I would like to see the web UI expanded further.

I would also like to see - and there might be some documentation around it - building your own smart response plug-ins.

I think those would be pretty nice.

So far so good. No complaints.

It's been very good. I've had a couple instances where it's taken a week or more to figure out the issue. But usually, when it gets to the tier-2, tier-3 guys, they get it answered really quickly. We've also had a lot of success sending logs to them so they can do RegX on those for us, some custom parsing. It's nice.

The issues we had surrounded integrating the Qualys API, and some questions that we had. It ended up taking awhile to get it figured out, that we needed to get a feature request put in.

In terms of a solution being unified, end-to-end, for us it's huge. We have a ton of different security controls. I'm sure we're not any different than any other organization. Being able to bring it all in and put it on a single pane of glass is awesome.

My rating of eight out of 10 for LogRhythm is because, while I think the support is great, the solution is a little rough around the edges. Like I said, I'd like to see the web UI built out more, and be able to jam more data into it. The fat client console feels a little rough around the edges to me, even though I use it every day. But overall, not a ton of complaints.

Definitely check out LogRhythm. That's one of the things that I've noticed in talking to other people, it seems like people really focus on other top 10 SIEM tools like ArcSight and such. I don't hear LogRhythm talked about that much, so usually I'll bring it up and say, "Hey, go check out Logger."

I like the usability of it. I like the web console and the ability to pivot through all the data in real-time.

We have a pretty varied environment. We have all kinds of compliance. We have PCI, HIPAA, FISMA and the like. We are also a large development shop. It's not as strict as we would like it to be.

As a security organization, our key challenges/goals are just staying on top of everything. The environment changes rapidly, especially with a big dev environment.

Regarding meeting those goals, In the last two months that we've had LogRhythm it's been very good. We ripped out an old SIEM that wasn't quite as easy to use. That has been nice.

The benefits are that it gives us a central pane of view for all of our logs and all the events. Where it's really helped us is that it requires less time to remediate and detect any issues.

It's hard to say what should be improved because we're still trying to get an understanding of what the tool does.

I think in all the sessions we have at the LogRhythm User Conference, we'll find out more what the tool does. Then, from there, we'll probably decide if we really wish it would do this or that.

Two months.

I have not personally used it, but a co-worker has. So far, we're very happy with it.

We did have a previous SIEM solution, which was IBM QRadar. One of the biggest reasons we decided to move on from that was cost. The renewal costs from IBM were extraordinarily high. We had already talked to LogRhythm for a different use case, with compliance. We already knew what LogRhythm had to offer.

It was a little bit of both straightforward and complex. There were certain parts of it that were very straightforward. There were other pieces where we just had to get a grip on which log sources we were going to send where, and how to manage it all.

When selecting a vendor, one of the biggest things for us is ease of use. The second is how are they going to be a partner with us?

In terms of advice to someone who is looking into this kind of solution, I would say to look at the long-term costs of any solution that you're looking at.

Visibility, obviously. Seeing all the logs from all the various log sources, be it perimeter, internal, overall security controls; getting it in one pane of glass. And alerting, obviously.

I started here two years ago, no SIEM. Now we have visibility into any type of external attacks, perimiter attacks. We've found operational problems, misconfigurations, things like that.

Logging improvements. I think that the template to reporting is just difficult, it's hard to go back. You can't modify the templates. So more customization. That would be key.

We could also use more information on how to integrate with specific vendors.

Threat intelligence is a big thing. LogRhythm actually has a pretty good threat intelligence deal, but we happen to use a vendor that is not built-in. It'd be great if LogRhythm could expand more on the user forum on how to integrate more with the more non-mainstream vendors.

It's good. We have all-in-one, an XM unit, because we're a smaller shop. It's been a great, a single unit. As we've needed to expand, I've put out more collector systems feeding back into the XM unit, so it's good.

We've used them many times. I'd say overall good. I was actually an ArcSight user at a previous company, I'd rank LogRhythm higher than those guys.

As I said, it was ArcSight at my previous company. I was lucky enough to try to build the security practice where I'm at now. LogRhythm was one of three that we evaluated.

I'd say straightforward. We did have PS as well, so it was very helpful.

QRadar and Splunk. And, for whatever reason - it is not really a truly a SIEM player - Tripwire. Management wanted us to evaluate Tripwire.

We're about 1200 seats, 10 locations roughly, totally a Cisco shop, from perimeter ASAs to IDS, Sourcefire, to web filtering, it's a big Cisco shop that I stepped into.

Our key security goals revolve around maturation and pulling more information into the SIEM. We started off with the low hanging fruit, the Active Directory, the SOCKS servers, things like that. But now we need to get more - all our security controls as well - security systems. We need more from executive PCs, from application servers, we need more visibility I think.

In terms of meeting these goals, this solution, on a scale of one to 10, is an eight, at least in terms of how we've been able to adopt it.

The most important criterion when selecting a vendor interoperability, the ability to pull logs, and the ease of customizing parsing logs. By far.

In terms of advice to a colleague, if they're looking at this and similar solutions: I've dealt with ArcSight before, they're a magnitude higher in terms of operationally managing the software. I haven't used QRadar, but from the surface, looking at it form 10,000 feet, I would say and Logarithm and it are probably much easier to mange, much easier to use.

LogRhythm has been really a good partner, they've reached out, they're always wanting information, "How we can improve? How can we do this or that?" Our SE and sales guy are really great. Keep in touch, so I feel like there's someone I can always reach out to if there's a problem.

For me, the NERC compliance modules are probably the best thing. And the system monitors, they really pick up a lot for me.

It helps you get an eagle-eye view and then delve down granularly. The ease of that is pretty amazing.

I've got three main datacenters and then I'm processing somewhere in the vicinity of 20 million logs a day. My key challenge is making sure that I'm complying with federal regulations.

It's helping me in my compliance role. Helping me to provide evidence for our audits so that I can show we're doing what we're doing.

My main thing I'd like to see is, when you're using canned reports, that they're not blank. If there's no log source say, "No log source", or if it didn't find anything say, "It didn't find anything". I hate blank reports.

I think it's pretty amazing. We have two deployments. My deployment is a small one that is on secured systems. We also have another deployment that's way bigger and for our normal corporate environment. So it fits from small to huge.

I have used LogRhythm tech support and I would say those guys are phenomenal, outstanding. They get back to you quick. If they can't answer it right off the bat they get an engineer to give you a call back, and they follow it through till it's good.

I gave it an eight out of 10 because you can kind of dig around and find what you need, so it's fairly user friendly. And the support that you get from their tech teams is pretty phenomenal.

I'd say definitely give it a look, and talk with them. I would definitely say that the support that you're going to get is well worth it.

It has helped tremendously when following up on investigations and logs. We often get bogged down with many tasks during the day. We can actually come back to a particular scenario that we are looking into, so it has been very beneficial for that.

Key challenges are our users and network. In our network, we get logs from a particular product called a NetScaler, which hides our source IPs, so that makes it a little challenging. Our goals are to tune LogRhythm further and utilize all the different modules that they do offer us. It is a challenge to get it all done.

• The web console
• The case management

I did hear about the new playbook edition coming up and I am excited about it.

It is excellent.

I have used the tech support and think they are great. I have many vendors that I deal with for other tools and hands down LogRhythm has been the best SIEM solution.

It is a big project, but very worthwhile, and LogRhythm has plenty of documentation, support people, professional services, and classes that can help get a business implemented and push them all the way to completion. I definitely think it is worthwhile.

It is very important for me that the solution be a unified end-to-end platform.

The consistency of its interface, whether you go to a dashboard, a search, an alarm - everything comes back consistently. There isn't a different interface for every function that you do, so it makes it very usable.

The benefit is really getting insight into the security posture of my organization. Proof in the pudding was that we had a penetration test over the summer and we caught the penetration testers five times because of various LogRhythm alerts.

The biggest thing I want is, right now you have thick console and the web console. Most of the reporting has to be done in the thick console. I'd love more reporting in the web console. A lot of our users don't have access to the thick console, only administrators do, so a lot of users can't run their own reports.

I think part of the thing that LogRhythm has always done with the deployment is a lot of hand-holding by Professional Services. I would tell everybody that was going to do this to pay the money and get Professional Services. Don't try to do it by yourself.

Awesome. In fact, I just went through a scaling exercise where we outgrew our initial implementation and we were able to double, very easily, our capacity through an upgrade process.

They're awesome. We use them all the time. I tell my staff that whenever you have an issue, the first thing you do is you open a ticket with tech support, then you start playing with it. If you have solved it by the time tech support gets back to you, cancel the ticket.

We were previously using SolarWinds and we outgrew it. It wasn't scalable. We needed to find a solution that would scale as we grew it.

It was straightforward.

We're a big university. We're the 26th largest university. I've got 45,000 students, 10,000 researchers and faculty members, plus staff. Main campus is in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. A mile down the road we have a Health Science campus that has a medical school, a dental school, a pharmacy school, and it's kind of attached to the hospital, which is separate from us. We also have campuses in Harrisburg and Center City that are small adjunct campuses. We also have a campus in Japan and a campus in Rome. We have a big international presence, that's the size and the scope.

Our key challenge is that the drivers of the university have been notoriously open, but with the threat landscape of today we have to be mindful that the openness that the faculty wants has to be balanced with the needs of protecting all of the data information that we have, like any business has.

When it comes to the most important criteria when selecting a vendor, a unified, end-to-end platform is really important, but it's one of the key features. We look at the overall value that a platform has. Cost comes in, but also leadership in the field, manageability, how many FTEs it's going to take to run this solution. All of those things are factors.

I've been around this field for 25 years. I've used many solutions. LogRhythm is scalable, it's robust, they're constantly growing it, their tech support is good, their Professional Services are good. We just went through a massive upgrade to double our capacity. They give us training credits on our old solution. They want customer happiness and customer success.

Definitely do your homework. Understand what logs are important to you and really evaluate what scope you need to do, and take your time. This is a big project, you can't do it all at once. You really have got to do it in phases.

• The user interface (UI)
• Ease of use, especially if you are starting off
• The AI

Key challenges and goals: Anytime you are building a program from the ground up, there is a lot of legwork to be done to get things tuned to the point where they are usable.

Effectiveness of solution in meeting security challenges and goals: It is very effective. It is a single pane of glass for all of the logs, that not just myself, but anybody who is looking for information about how the network is behaving can use. So, not just primarily a security tool, it is a tool for everybody if it is set up that way.

We run across the odd vendor which we are using that we think are large players in their environment, but there is not necessarily a native support for their log ingestion per se, where it requires customization in order to be able to parse and accept their logs. I would also like to see them expand on some of the ability to interact with other technologies in real time via the programming platforms.

It pre-existed before I got there. Once it was deployed, I have been responsible for most of the log ingestion and the tuning efforts.

It seems scalable so far. I have not had to add more devices to our deployment yet, but it has yet to be discovered.

We have used LogRhythm tech support and they are excellent. They have been very helpful.

This is our first adoption of a proper SIEM product, so there is really nothing to compare it to with respect to the job that I am in right now.

It pre-existed before I got there.

I am very happy with the solution right now. I would absolutely recommend it and have.

Most of the basics have been tended to, and as we discover other things that we need to get more data on, and they are brought up, the company addresses them.

The most important criteria when selecting a vendor: It is very important for it to be unified.