JIRA Portfolio Reviews

With Jira software, I can implement DevOps. The Jira Software Management is a part of the ITSM, incident management, for the principal features of the software. It's basically used for DevOps and the ITSM.

I like the Jira Software Management. You can attend to many areas for the customer. For example, I can support IT as well as the financial areas. Jira Software Management is very important for the customers for this reason.

The initial setup process is simple. 

We have found the solution to be stable.

It is highly scalable due to the cloud.

Technical support has been great.

The HR aspect of the solution could be improved. 

I've used the solution for one year. I started to work with Jira when I started with my organization.

The solution is very stable. There are no bugs or glitches and it doesn't crash or freeze. It's reliable. 

Scaling is easy as the software work in the cloud. That makes it very simple to scale the software. It's no problem.

We have a lot of users on the solution currently. 

Technical support is good. they have been helpful and responsive for the most part.

Positive

We have found the implementation process to be simple and straightforward. the setup is not hard. I'd rate it a four out of five for ease of use.

The deployment takes about two months. Of course, it depends on the customer and varies a bit. 

I do not have any knowledge of the licensing cost.

We are just customers. We don't have a business relationship with Jira.

It's important to know about the database. It is important to know about databases for implementing Jira Software Management.

I'd rate the solution a nine out of ten.

We primarily use this program as backlog management using Kanban and Scrum and also to model service tickets.

The solution has improved our organization by allowing us to create our own customization. We can track the live status of all the flows on one page and get a single view of our progress. Also, it gives us a quality overview. 

The workflow configurations, Screen filed mapping and confluence integration of this solution are what I value most. Definitely there are multiple features to support this. 

I would say that there's a lot of reporting on the dashboard so something that can be improved is the project level visibility because it is a little unclear. Especially when you compare it to JIRA Central.

I've been using this solution for around five years now on a private cloud. 

The solution is very stable.

The scalability of this program is good but it can be improved on the Administration side. 

I would say their support center is good and I would rate it a 3.5 out of 5. Every product has some pluses or minuses. So it takes a little time for things to get fixed and we always submit feedback and ask for improvements. Every product has its own backlog where we submit our request so that it gets prioritized properly. They build the product requirements based on the number of requests coming from a different client so I understand that sometimes it gets delayed.  

We currently use three solutions simultaneously, namely JIRA, Rally, and Octane. 

The initial setup was straightforward, but it is evolving towards complex now because there are many flows and many different projects. Reporting has to be done across all these projects. We use different tools for deployment.

Yes.

JIRA is a very flexible solution, so if you are a mid or small-sized team, it is very useful for the team. When you have a higher scale of work, I would say the portfolio management and the reporting need to improve. You either have to build your own solution on the APIs or you have to manage how you can configure in the current flows. My rating out of ten will be seven or eight.

In the next version, I would like to see better reporting and safer plugins, as well as easier scalability.

I primarily use the product to collaborate with the product and engineering teams. Depending on the product stage, I may draft or review the PRD, providing feedback for improvement. I use it to plan and schedule the things I take care of. I can create and share a document if I want to discuss new ideas with my team remotely. 

Before, I used Excel, but switching to this tool has been a significant improvement. It's much more collaborative and user-friendly. With many functions, entering and processing data is easier and faster. I can easily link documents to clients and perform tasks like inserting tables with simple commands, which helps speed up my work.

Jira Portfolio is part of our standard operating procedures to ensure product functions run seamlessly and smoothly. Providing people with sufficient tools to collaborate effectively is crucial to achieve this. Jira has become the go-to document processing tool for facilitating this collaboration and ensuring productivity. Every aspect of the product is critical for your workflow, whether gathering input from team members or seamlessly writing and managing documents.

We are based in India; I would like the product to integrate local pricing. We earn in rupees but spend in dollars. Its pricing could also be lowered. 

I have been using the product for three and a half years. 

I haven't encountered any stability issues. 

I haven't contacted the technical support team personally. 

Jira Portfolio's deployment is easy. We started by signing up for the software's seven-day free trial using our credit card.  After the trial, we decided to opt for a paid plan based on the number of licenses we needed. As for any custom plans or requirements, we haven't reached that scale yet, but we know we can contact their team for further discussions when needed.

Integrating Jira Portfolio with Slack, Camunda, and other tools is part of our standard operating procedure. It helps in coordination. However, I didn't handle the integration myself. Instead, I relied on a team of more experts about the product. 

Our team has worked with the product previously and didn't need to overcome learning curve challenges. 80 percent of my organization is well versed in it. They can help people who don't know the product. I rate it an eight out of ten.

JIRA Portfolio is a tool that is primarily used for software development. Our scrum teams and product owners utilize it to manage the software development process. We have an extensive internal software development process that is supported by JIRA Portfolio.

The solution is deployed on JIRA's Atlassian Cloud.

The best features of JIRA are its flexibility and configurability, allowing us to tailor it to our specific needs. Additionally, its widespread familiarity makes it easier to onboard new employees, and its associated software development tools are a major plus.

The user interface of JIRA is not very user friendly, and its configuration capabilities are limited when it comes to creating a more user-friendly experience. For example, there is no way to group fields, use bold fonts, or add colors to the interface. This is one of the main drawbacks of JIRA, as it severely limits customization options despite its general functionality.

The reporting and dashboard capabilities have room for improvement. Though there are many powerful dashboarding and reporting solutions available such as Microsoft, Qlik, and eazyBI, they may not be as flexible as desired. To maximize their utility, the ability to extract data, upload it to other tools, and use the data for reporting is desirable. Our company currently uses eazyBI as its primary reporting solution, but having the capability to upload data to other solutions using JIRA Portfolio could be advantageous.

We are working with the project portfolio and its associated reporting and KPIs. It would be helpful to have a tool that is specifically designed to track the KPIs of the portfolio. This feature should come with built-in project portfolio management processes, including KPIs, and a dashboard with preset configurations for managing the project portfolio and its KPIs. This would make it easier to work with the project portfolio and provide better visibility into its performance.

I have been using the solution for one year.

We have had issues with the speed of JIRA's Atlassian Cloud which the solution is deployed on.

We reached out to JIRA, our reseller, and our JIRA partner a few times over the years for support. One of the issues we had was with the speed of the cloud service, but this is a very rare occurrence. Most of the time we find what we need on JIRA's community chat and on Google.

Setting up the new software development process wasn't a difficult task, as there was an external company with JIRA competence in Lithuania we could hire to do the configuration. However, we had to gain more knowledge about the processes we wanted to implement on JIRA. This took some time, but after a few months of learning, members of our internal team were able to configure and develop JIRA by themselves without the help of external consultants.

I give the solution a seven out of ten.

We have 300 people using the solution.

We have customized JIRA to fit our needs in terms of portfolio management. JIRA is a powerful solution that will enable portfolio management activities to be done more efficiently. When portfolio management requires approval and process tasks, then JIRA is the right solution for the job. However, if the portfolio is more focused on reporting, then JIRA may not be so helpful and the user can continue using the tools they are currently using.

We are currently testing this solution with our primary use case being to deal with certain types of projects such as Cascade and Agile, as well as others that involve moving to a ticketing service, basically everything related to project management. I'm a project office supervisor. We are users of Portfolio. 

I like this solution because it has many functionalities. I love the supervision and the workflows that we can use for making a flow inside Jira. I love too, that we can take control of GitHub as it relates to project flow. Portfolio provides a good service that gives control over ticketing and control over the versions of the product. It provides resource management related to our projects.

This solution requires some effort to insert functionalities from Tempo to the base of Jira. I think that could be simplified.

I've been using this solution for three months. 

This is a solid solution and very stable. 

Portfolio is very easy to scale. 

For enterprise companies the licensing cost is fine. Those companies don't have budgetary issues. It's mid to smaller-size organizations like us that find this tool very expensive.

If you have the budget, then Jira is the way to go. 

I rate this solution nine out of 10.  

The primary use case for this solution is to manage the work that has to be done, everything else is on a repository that is maintained by another tool.

It's how the work has been designed at the beginning of the project. We have one repository where we store all of the requirements, the testing, and all of the activity trackings are done in JIRA.

The deployment model was on-premises.

There hasn't been an improvement because we were using JIRA solutions before.

It is difficult to narrow it down to features. It's one solution as a whole and to point out certain features is complicated.

There could be many things that could be improved but we haven't been working with it long enough to accurately find the weak points.

The pricing of add-ons could be improved. You should have the option to pay only for the users concerned, that would be fine, because of the dashboards everybody has access to the dashboard.

This solution is not able to be integrated with other solutions because you have to upgrade it and pay for more licensing.

This solution is stable.

This solution is scalable.

I have not had any experience with customer service or technical support.

Our IT department handles this area.

Our IT department completed the initial setup, so I am not sure how complex it was.

The implementation was done through our IT department.

The pricing of the solution is expensive. 

When you install any add-on, you have to pay for each and everyone who is declared on the system in order to have the add-on working. If you have anywhere from one hundred to five hundred users and even if you only have two hundred users using this solution, you have to pay for them all.

We evaluated other options but JIRA was already in place, which is one of the reasons we stayed with JIRA.

We are dealing with several products and clients, and each product has it's good points and it's weak points.

I don't have an opinion because I think that a good process does the job and you can apply a good process to any tool. 

The tools are more and more user-friendly. Even JIRA.  

When you want to implement something, keep it simple and it will work.

With JIRA, you can do amazing things by developing connectors, embedding features, and adding new fields to create new things.  

In the end, it needs to fit the process. If the process is of poor quality, then your tool will look poor.

For the most part, with several tools, you can do nearly anything.

JIRA is a good tool. Perhaps a little bit too much to configure and adapt, because it can be adapted to any kind of customer's needs and it's not dedicated to a specific solution, but it does the job.

I would rate this solution a seven out of ten.

I use Portfolio for project planning.

Portfolio's best feature is integration with other JIRA products.

In the next release, Portfolio should include more metrics and develop their portfolio planning.

I've been using Portfolio for several years.

We've had no issues with Portfolio's stability.

Portfolio is scalable.

I haven't used JIRA's technical support personally, but I've heard from others that it's good.

The initial setup is straightforward.

We used an in-house team.

Portfolio is very expensive, costing on average $2000-3000 per user per month. 

I would rate Portfolio eight out of ten.

I work in hybrid technologies. Right now I work in service management. Our software disc space uses JIRA Portfolio. I've got a DevOps team and a team that works with operations. There are different elements within service management that we use JIRA to build team plans.

The number one feature is that the product makes it easier to collaborate. I think that is the most important point even though it is not perfect. Another point is that the interface is not exactly rocket science and it is fairly easy to learn. It is very much driven towards use like Microsoft or any of the other core applications available. For project and portfolio management and in terms of incident management — things like that — it is not that complex. To rate it on a scale of one to five as to what it needs to do in this category, I'd give it a four-out-of-five.

It is easy to get help from the community. So that is also a bonus. But that is like the situation with most software now.

I think to improve the product they need to work on integration. I think what I call heterogeneous integration into other tools will be important. It would be nice to work with data modeling from any tool. From an enterprise reporting perspective, you definitely want to be able to take core data, put it into any sort of raw database and be able to manipulate it to get the information you are looking for. I think the reporting side is probably where JIRA is not the strongest product in my view. Needed improvements just boil down to an improved integration.

I know it is always going to be a challenge to add new features, but I think better integration around Microsoft or other core applications would help. I think big data warehousing is important. Enabling RPA for the benefits that can offer would help as well.

Stability is debatable because you are not doing a lot of batch management. It depends on your operating system. The benefit of using a cloud implementation is that in an on-prem solution you are always responsible for maintaining your own infrastructure, hardware, backups, doing maintenance — all of those components. But that is not really a major issue for stability.

If a product is a true enterprise product, then scalability should never be an issue. If you are not working with an enterprise then you are doing a cloud-based solution and it is definitely scalable as well.

There are probably teams of around 50 in our organization, mostly made up of end-users. Obviously we have admin people and we had OEM support. But the solution is scalable to meet our needs.

We have mostly been satisfied with our customer support experience. Customization is a bit tricky, so you have got to really understand what you are trying to achieve. Technical support was able to help us through some issues.

If I look at just on your ITSMs (IT Service Management) side, I've used ServiceNow. Also, HP Service Manager.

I do not think the initial setup was complex.

We got maintenance support from our vendor. It included time and material when we made the contract for support.

When considering the product solutions, I was looking for functionality comparisons between an SDM (Service Desk Management) BMC (Baseboard Management Controller) remedy. I'm sort of interested to understand what are the major benefits or differences between those two. I think that was really where I was trying to just get some help. I've got a team of about 169 people in the project and I was just trying to see where I could get information very quickly without having to go to the vendors. A lot of resources just house people with more questions than answers.

If you are looking for collaboration, then I would definitely recommend the product. It is one of the easiest and not very expensive.

On a scale from one to ten where one is the worst and ten is the best. I would rate the products overall as a  seven. It could not get a ten. Seven leaves room for improvement.