IIS Reviews

I use Windows Server IIS to publish our site for my Citrix applications.

I am using an older version of Windows Server IIS and the general management and navigation to get something done is not as straightforward as I hope it to be. The interface could be improved.

I have used Windows Server IIS for approximately three years.

Windows Server IIS is stable.

We have over 100 people using this solution in my organization.

I have contacted the support from Microsoft a few times. Depending on the issue we are having, the support in some cases takes a bit longer to get our point across for them to understand and then to receive a resolution that day.

I rate the support from Microsoft a four out of five.

I have not used another solution previously.

The initial setup of Windows Server IIS is complex. If you already have some experience it can be simple.

We have an external service provider that helps with the maintenance and monitoring of Windows Server IIS. We have internal personnel, but for anything that we can't figure out by ourselves, then we contact the service provider and external help desk.

The price of Windows Server IIS is expensive. They have a large user base, and they charge a little bit too much.

I rate Windows Server IIS an eight out of ten.

If I was using the newer version of Windows Server IIS I would rate it higher.

IIS's most valuable feature is user-friendliness. 

The tool needs to improve its performance. 

I have been using the product for five to ten years. 

IIS is stable. 

The tool's technical support is good. 

IIS's deployment is straightforward. It can completed in an hour. 

IIS's deployment can be completed in-house. 

IIS's pricing is not expensive. 

I rate the overall product an eight out of ten. 

We use the solution for our customer's web applications. 

IIS needs to improve its security. Its support needs to be faster and clear. The tool's licensing could be cheaper as well. 

I have been using the IIS for 15-20 years. 

My company has 200 users for IIS. 

The tool's setup is simple. 

We did not use a consultant for the product's setup. 

IIS is expensive. 

I would rate IIS a seven out of ten. 

We use the solution to build web-based applications and platforms.

The solution is easy to use.

The solution's scalability needs improvement.

It is reasonably stable.

The solution's scalability could be better.

The solution's initial setup process is straightforward.

If you're looking for a scalable solution, look at alternatives other than IIS. But it serves the purpose if you're looking for a small to medium solution. I rate it an eight.

The tool shows us the operating systems where our servers and applications are running. 

There is an issue with the network. The tool's price is also high. 

I am using the tool for one year. 

I would rate the tool's stability a ten out of ten. 

The solution is fully scalable. We have around 10-20 users for the solution. 

The solution's setup is straightforward. The deployment took around two to three weeks to complete.  

The tool's deployment can be done in-house. 

The tool's pricing is on a yearly basis. 

I would rate the product a nine out of ten. 

I am using IIS in our organization to manage the flow of the Active Directory.

The solution can be deployed on-premise and on the cloud.

The solution is highly reliable.

The solution is slow and could have better performance.

I used IIS within the last 12 months.

I rate the stability of IIS a six out of ten.

The solution is scalable.

The initial setup of IIS is easy.

I am able to deploy the solution myself.

There is a license needed for the solution.

I do not like the solution but I have no choice but to use it. I prefer open-source solutions, such as Linux.

I rate IIS a five out of ten. 

I use the solution to maintain the web application by updating the port, DNS name, and date.

The solution's stability needs improvement.

I have been using the solution for two months.

The solution could be more stable. I rate its stability as a four.

It is a scalable solution. We have around 2,000 solution users.

The solution's initial setup was straightforward.

I deployed the solution with the help of online forums. It took two to three hours.

I rate the solution as a ten out of ten.

IIS is useful for the deployment of web applications.

There aren't any particular features I found valuable since it is just used for deployment purposes.

Performance-wise, certain improvements in IIS are needed.

I have been using IIS for not more than a year now. I also sell IIS.

Its stability is good. People use it widely to host their on-premises applications, like, internal applications on IIS.

It is scalable if we include the application stack. IIS is not scalable. Its scalability is less. If we talk about its scalability with respect to the cloud, as we are seeing as of now, it's not that much scalable. We need to put some extra effort into making it scalable. Almost everyone who has a Windows server uses the solution for hosting their internal applications.

The solution's initial setup is a little complex, especially compared to what others provide. It is better than Apache.

If there are no issues, the solution's deployment can be done in an hour or two maximum. Two people are required for the deployment and maintenance of the solution. Also, it depends on the size of the infrastructure and the servers and everything. The requirement for the infrastructure is not that big. So two people are more than enough. One is the administrator, and the other one is the developer. But if there is a lot of development, then the people required for deployment and maintenance would depend on the size of the application.

The cost for IIS is already included in Windows services. We don't have to pay anything extra. We only pay for the Windows server.

I would tell those planning to use the solution depending on their requirement. If the requirement is for on-premises and in an isolated environment, then people install it on the server and start using it. But if the requirement is to go on the cloud and make the website public, then it is preferable to opt for the cloud.

I rate the overall solution an eight out of ten.

We are using IIS got Active Directory and DNS.

We are using six core hardware from Dell to run the solution.

The most valuable feature of IIS is the database it provides.

IIS could improve by Microsoft Windows improving the update services. We would like to be able to update all systems that are connected. The WSA service has to be in good order to accomplish this.

I have been using IIS for approximately nine years.

The solution is highly stable.

IIS is scalable.

We have approximately 75 servers using the solution. We have plans to increase our usage.

I have not used the support from the vendor for IIS.

The initial setup of IIS is simple and can be done within one hour.

We are using the solution virtually and we did the deployment. We have two or three people who deploy the solution.

There is an annual license to use this solution and the price could be better.

I would recommend this solution to others.

I rate IIS a nine out of ten.

IIS is primarily used for hosting and managing web applications.

The performance of IIS could be improved. Occasionally, we encounter performance issues with IIS where it becomes unresponsive and requires a solution restart.

I have been using IIS for six years.

I give IIS a seven out of ten for stability.

IIS is scalable.

The initial setup is straightforward.

The licensing cost is dependent on the usage.

I give IIS an eight out of ten.

We have around 15,000 people using IIS in the organization.

We require around three people for IIS maintenance.

I recommend IIS to others.