Lead Talent Acquisition Specialist at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Real User
Simple to deploy, low maintenance, and technical support is always reachable
Pros and Cons
  • "This initial setup is not complex at all. Deploying it was very easy."
  • "The user interface should be enhanced to include more monitoring features and other metrics. The metrics should include not only those from the IBM MQ point of view but also CPU and memory utilization."

What is our primary use case?

Our use cases for IBM MQ involve share markets.

In this organization, we are not using many of the features because we have a very small infrastructure. In my previous organizations, I used many of the components including AMS. However, here, we are just using it as a messaging solution and not any of the other components.

What is most valuable?

The MQ appliance has very good performance.

What needs improvement?

The user interface should be easier to use.

The user interface should be enhanced to include more monitoring features and other metrics. The metrics should include not only those from the IBM MQ point of view but also CPU and memory utilization. These kinds of features would be really helpful when we have a large infrastructure. Right now, this limits us from using the product.

In general, the user interface should be more catchy, to entice users.

IBM should promote the use of the MQ appliance because the speed and performance are superior when compared to traditional ways of using the product.

If IBM were to release as least some limited features for MQ as open-source, then it would be great because people will migrate to this solution instead of choosing open-source products like Apache Kafka or RabbitMQ.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been working with IBM MQ for almost 13 years across different organizations. I began working with version 5.3 and am currently using version 9.

Buyer's Guide
IBM MQ
May 2024
Learn what your peers think about IBM MQ. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: May 2024.
770,428 professionals have used our research since 2012.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

The stability is absolutely perfect when it is running on AIX. However, I have experienced some issues with certain Linux distributions. With AIX, I have not had any problems with IBM MQ. With other flavors of Linux, there is some instability whereby the MQ configuration parameters are not giving the proper information. From this, I have concluded that the stability of MQ depends on the Linux distribution that it is running on.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

The number of users in my current organization is six or seven. This is the number of applications that we have. This is not an extensive use of the product but we do plan to increase usage in the future.

In my previous organization, our use was more extensive. We had between 700 and 710 users.

This product scales and the number of users depends on the industry, as well as the financial strengths that the organization has.

How are customer service and support?

The technical support from IBM is always reachable.

Internally, we provide technical support to our users. This is possible because our team is only six or seven users.

How was the initial setup?

This initial setup is not complex at all. Deploying it was very easy.

What about the implementation team?

Limited staff is required to maintain this solution because of its stability.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

The licensing fees are paid quarterly and they are expensive. This is something that I have heard from all of the organizations that I have worked with.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

I have evaluated Apache Kafka and RabbitMQ because of the open-source features and benefits. The open-source aspect is an advantage. I have found that not many users choose IBM MQ, even though it is stable, because of financial constraints.

If IBM were to release MQ or at least some limited version as open-source, it would become more popular. People would choose it instead of implementing other products, or other streaming solutions. This is what people are trying to do with DevOps.

IBM MQ is much more stable than these other products, although the rest of them work well with cloud providers such as AWS.

What other advice do I have?

Overall, this is a good product. The only thing that I found complex was to build the user interface with the latest versions of IBM MQ. It was a little bit tricky to do.

I would rate this solution an eight out of ten.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

On-premises
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
IT Consultant at Ministry of Justice, Kuwait
Consultant
Secure, fast, and easy to work with
Pros and Cons
  • "Secure, safe, and very fast."
  • "I wanted to upgrade Windows Server. It's not that easy to move."

What is most valuable?

  • Secure
  • Safe
  • Very fast

It's a very good product. Very easy to work with.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using IBM MQ for about nine years. We have many projects with it in many places in Kuwait.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

There have been no issues with the stability of the solution.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

I haven't had any issues with the scalability.

How are customer service and technical support?

I only contacted technical support when I wanted to upgrade Windows Server. It's not that easy to move. I had Windows 2008, and I wanted to go to Windows 2012 or '16. You have to reinstall, or there was a solution somebody told me about and that made life easier.

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup is straightforward. On the AS/400, setup takes about an hour.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

Whatever the price is, it's worth it.

What other advice do I have?

I would recommend it to other people. When somebody wants to do colocation with us, we force them to buy IBM MQ.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

On-premises
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
Buyer's Guide
IBM MQ
May 2024
Learn what your peers think about IBM MQ. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: May 2024.
770,428 professionals have used our research since 2012.
IT Team Lead at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees
Real User
Clustering is good, but the setup is difficult
Pros and Cons
  • "The clusterization which results in persistence is the most valuable feature."
  • "The initial setup is difficult. Creating your own cluster is difficult. Working with cluster repositories is difficult. Issue management with IBM MQ is difficult."

What is our primary use case?

We use it to send a notification to our customers.

What is most valuable?

The clusterization which results in persistence is the most valuable feature. I only use a very small number of its features.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using IBM MQ for about three years. For about one year I wrote adapters for IBM Broker and for two years or more I wrote services that used IBM MQ. This was a Java application by JMS.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

The stability is okay.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

Scalability is not an issue of IBM MQ. There is no replication of messages and that is very bad for systems. Only persistence can solve this issue.

How are customer service and technical support?

IBM technical support is good.

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup is difficult. Creating your own cluster is difficult and working with cluster repositories is difficult. Issue management with IBM MQ is difficult.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

It's a very expensive product.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

I like RabbitMQ more than IBM MQ.

What other advice do I have?

If you have a lot of money then I would, of course, recommend IBM MQ.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

On-premises
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
Consultant at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees
Real User
Enables us to distribute records, working with a mainframe system
Pros and Cons
  • "I haven't seen any severe issues related to it. Most of the time it's running. That is the advantage of IBM MQ."
  • "In terms of volume, it is not able to handle a huge volume. We also have limitations of queues related to IBM MQ. We often need to handle a very big volume, but currently we do have limitations. If those kinds of limitations could be relaxed, it would help us to work better."

What is our primary use case?

All our applications run around MQ. We run a backend system working with a mainframe and we distribute records via MQ. We are using it daily.

What is most valuable?

From the time I joined this company I have been working with IBM MQ. Until now I haven't seen any severe issues related to it. Most of the time it's running. That is the advantage of IBM MQ.

What needs improvement?

It could be easier to use.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been working with IBM MQ for close to 14 years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

It is stable.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

It can scale but sometimes, in terms of volume, it is not able to handle a huge volume. We also have limitations of queues related to IBM MQ. We often need to handle a very big volume, but currently we do have limitations. If those kinds of limitations could be relaxed, it would help us to work better.

How was the initial setup?

I'm working on the development side. There is a setup team that is dedicated to working on implementations. I don't have enough hands-on in the configuration of MQ to comment on the setup.

What other advice do I have?

If you're looking for stability I would recommend using IBM MQ. But people, these days, are starting to work with Kafka, which is an open system. I don't have enough knowledge about Kafka to comment on it. I just work with MQ.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

On-premises
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
it_user632727 - PeerSpot reviewer
Technology Architect at Accenture
Real User
MQ is one of the integrations that we use for the z Systems to the open system connectivity.

What is most valuable?

MQ is one of the key integrations that we use for the z Systems to the open system connectivity. It helps us to transform the systems from the legacy enrollment to the latest technologies, as well. I'm part of the legacy transformations team and it provides really easy migrations, when it comes to integration with MQ. Any other integrations are a little bit challenging for us.

How has it helped my organization?

As I mentioned elsewhere, it provides one of the most seamless integrations that we can do both from open systems to z Systems or vice versa. These are the major benefits that we see. Since we are major resellers for IBM products, we generally look for transformation from z Systems to open systems and this tool helps us in transforming those.

What needs improvement?

They need to provide more and more platform integrations because I'm not sure what are the latest upgrades, in terms of MQ as of today. The latest integrations are going to take place in different cloud environments. So, I am not quite sure as to how seamless it can be integrated with other environments and I need to check that. This is also part of my job exercise, that I need to do every time.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

There were not many stability issues, for sure. MQ is predominately a stable product, right from the z System days. I started out my career with z Systems, so we used MQ with part of the integration and it really helped us.

How are customer service and technical support?

A long time ago, and not in the recent past, we did experience some issues with the technical support.

Our company has its own IBM center of excellence, where we have all of the required expertise within our organization, predominantly for this product. In addition, we have partnership support that we are getting every time from IBM.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

We haven't faced a situation where we needed to invest in a new solution, predominately since our clients already have MQ. We are just transforming, upgrading or optimizing those versions; we are only doing this type of work.

How was the initial setup?

The setup is moderate; it's not that complex. Recently, we are working for one of the Microsoft technologies transformation, i.e., from the legacy Microsoft technologies to the latest Microsoft technologies and that integrates with some of the z Systems.They are using MQ as the integration layer and even there, it was a very seamless integration for us. It's not too complicated nor very simple either. It is at the moderate level, which for integration is anticipated.

What other advice do I have?

There is quite a good amount of documentation that you can get either from the IBM Redbooks or from the IBM support websites. Also, if you are partners with our company, then you will get the required support.

Before installing, I would request you to do a quick analysis and go through the end-to-end process, as to what are your requirements and how to configure this product up-front, i.e., instead of directly installing it and then, trying to configure it on the fly.

In general, when selecting a vendor, we look for more and more support.

Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
it_user632694 - PeerSpot reviewer
System Engineer at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees
Vendor
We like the queue depths and creations for the installations.

What is most valuable?

Most valuable for us are the queue depths and creations for the installations. Being a business in financial solutions, we depend on it more for those things, so it's very valuable for us. For most of the applications like JBoss and others we use IBM MQ.

What needs improvement?

It just needs a better installation. An easier user-friendly installation.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

The stability is good. I mean we do have some issues but we always contact IBM whenever we have performance-based issues and we get solutions quick and fast.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

Scalability is great.

How are customer service and technical support?

The technical support is great. Normally, whenever we have an issue, within 24 hours we will get a resolution, so we can close it and leave it to the IBM technical support guys. We get a solution mostly within 24 hours, so that's great.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

We didn't have another solution previously, we have always been with MQ.

How was the initial setup?

I would say it was both straightforward and complex, but not that complex. I mean the installation normally would take some time and with all of them open, it's just a button click and you're done.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

I wasn't involved in the selection of the vendors.

What other advice do I have?

Go for it. You should always check out the performance and trust for a good solution.

Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
it_user632691 - PeerSpot reviewer
Systems Engineer at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees
Vendor
We use it for authentication and authorization of incoming requests.

What is most valuable?

We can do the authentication and authorization of incoming requests using IBM WebSphere and DataPower. That's important to us because we can confidentially send the data with restrictions to other platforms.

How has it helped my organization?

In terms of benefits, our customers are happier since we are doing a good job.

What needs improvement?

In the next release, we would like to see more authentication capabilities embedded and included in the existing product.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

I don't know about the stability.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

We are good with the scalable data in the product.

How is customer service and technical support?

I haven't used the technical support.

How was the initial setup?

I was not involved in the initial setup.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

I'm not sure about alternative solutions considered.

What other advice do I have?

I definitely recommend them.

When selecting a vendor, we are looking for timely interaction. In case there any issues, we need to get support immediately.

Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
it_user632742 - PeerSpot reviewer
Data Flow Manager at a consumer goods company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Vendor
It can be managed from a web page and it is stable.

What is most valuable?

It can be managed from a web page.

How has it helped my organization?

The benefits of the new version are greater ease of use and management of MQ.

What needs improvement?

At a recent industry event, I discovered that the future version of MQ would provide more web services, such as API, and the ability to manage MQ using a web application. Those will be very good improvements to the product.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

I can say that it's stable.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

It is scalable, but not easily.

How are customer service and technical support?

I have opened a ticket. Technical support are not bad.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

Relationship is the most important element when looking for a vendor.

How was the initial setup?

I was not involved with the initial setup. We usually get in touch with them in order to solve the issues.

What other advice do I have?

Just go ahead and do it.

Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
Buyer's Guide
Download our free IBM MQ Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions.
Updated: May 2024
Buyer's Guide
Download our free IBM MQ Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions.