We use Harness for deploying Kubernetes clusters. It is a SaaS-based tool with a good graphical user interface. We can create workflows and deployment pipelines and easily visualize them. We can see the logs and understand where the pipeline is breaking. It's a highly customizable DevOps tool.
Engineering Technical Leader - SRE (Cloud/Kubernetes-Security) at Cisco
Provides a good graphical interface, but the initial setup process needs improvement
Pros and Cons
- "It's a highly customizable DevOps tool."
- "There's also room for improvement in debugging pipeline issues, which can sometimes become complex."
What is our primary use case?
What is most valuable?
The platform's most valuable features are ease of use and a good graphical user interface.
What needs improvement?
The platform's initial setup process could be simplified. Additionally, security features and capabilities for understanding vulnerabilities within the application could be enhanced directly from the tool. There's also room for improvement in debugging pipeline issues, which can sometimes become complex. Limitations regarding reconciliation features and support for certain parts of the infrastructure should also be addressed.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
The product is stable.
Buyer's Guide
Harness
April 2026
Learn what your peers think about Harness. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: April 2026.
892,943 professionals have used our research since 2012.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
We have five Harness users in our organization. Being a SaaS product, scalability should not be an issue.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
The decision to use Harness was primarily driven by its secure support for Kubernetes services and user-friendly deployment process, which requires minimal knowledge. The company sought to simplify and reduce the complexity and risks associated with deployment processes. Opting for a SaaS solution allowed them to avoid managing infrastructure and pay on a per-usage basis, providing scalability without the burden of infrastructure management. Additionally, Harness offers features such as log collection, integration with cloud storage services like S3, and auto-healing capabilities.
What other advice do I have?
The pricing aspect needs to be considered first based on your requirements. Secondly, it might be suitable if your team is technically proficient in tools like Argo CD. However, if you have a complex infrastructure and limited personnel to manage it, Harness would be a better choice.
We integrated Harness with Kubernetes, and the setup didn't significantly affect our existing infrastructure. Learning to use Harness for basic tasks is relatively easy, but mastering complex operations may require time and team support.
I rate it a seven out of ten.
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
Buyer's Guide
Download our free Harness Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros
sharing their opinions.
Updated: April 2026
Product Categories
Build Automation Static Application Security Testing (SAST) Cloud Cost Management Feature ManagementPopular Comparisons
SonarQube
Snyk
GitLab
IBM Turbonomic
Sonatype Lifecycle
Jenkins
Spot by Flexera
GitHub Actions
Tekton
Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360)
CloudBees
Cloudability
VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth
TeamCity
Bamboo
Buyer's Guide
Download our free Harness Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros
sharing their opinions.
Quick Links
Learn More: Questions:
- What are the differences among Jenkins, Urbancode build and ElectricAccelerator?
- When evaluating Build Automation, what aspect do you think is the most important to look for?
- Should project automation software be integrated with cloud-based tools?
- Is there a need for workflow automation?
- What is the Robotic Process Automation (RPA) life cycle?
- What is Automation as a Service (AaaS)?
- Why is Build Automation important for companies?

















