Elastic Search Reviews

• Fast search
• Relevant results returned
• Autocomplete/fuzzy search

• Search 
• To implement the main requirements regarding my support portal.

Machine learning on search.

No issues. It is very stable.

No issues. It is easy to scale with the cluster node model.

I would rate technical support with a nine out of 10. Support is very reactive and proactive.

We did have a previous solution. It was a monster to install and configure.

The initial setup was straightforward.

The pricing and license model are clear: node-based model. 

We evaluated Solr.

The search product is a product exposing API. Therefore, be comfortable in developing your own front-end to integrate the Search API.

We use ELK primarily for enterprise monitoring and analytics through log ingestion. The data collected in Elasticsearch will be used for near real-time monitoring, analytics, and machine learning.

All new applications have been onboarded and used by the application teams. The initial feedback has been positive, and its capabilities seem to be a descent fit for our needs.

ELK being an open source certainly provided a platform for our organization to get involved. 

X-Pack provides good features, like authorization and alerts. An X-Pack license is more affordable than Splunk.

Logstash has been a challenge and needs improvements in data ingestion reconciliation. The Kibana Cross Cluster feature is long awaited and I hope 6.0 will address it without issues.

ELK has been considered as an alternative to Splunk to reduce licensing costs.

ELK provides 

• good end to end log monitoring
• Logstash grok pattern
• elasticserach indexing
• easily configurable Kibana dashboards
• feature rich and appealing Kibana UI, as its USP.

The product offers a powerful, cost effective solution for proprietary log management and is easy to understand and start with. This saves cost as well as enhances usability.

The open source version should ship basic security versions with it. Alerting is an important feature which is not available in the open source stack.

About two years.

Stability issues can be seen with Logstash and can be addressed using Kafka. Also, data collections may not be 100% optimal using Filebeat and could be further improved.

The product is highly scalable, especially on the database side (elasticserach).

Have worked on the open source version and, hence, I don't have much information about tech support.

I have not worked with another solution.

The setup is straightforward for PoC, but becomes complex while scaling it or deploying it for production.

Yes, I evaluated GrayLog and Fluentd, but ELK was more feature rich.

The ELK open source stack is rich in features but lacks the essential security features.

ELK is one of the best open source alternatives for log management. If alerting and security features can be built by the team internally, on top of the stack, then the product is for sure going to add a lot of value to business.

We use the product for log management. 

The products comes with REST APIs. 

Elastic Search needs to improve authentication. It also needs to work on the Kibana visualization dashboard. 

I have been using the product for six years. 

I rate the product's stability a nine out of ten. 

I rate Elastic Search's scalability a ten out of ten. 

The technical team needs to improve their response time. 

Positive

The tool's deployment is easy. It took us one day to deploy a seven-node Elastic Search cluster. 

Elastic Search is open-source, but you need to pay for support, which is expensive. 

The solution suits medium to large companies better. I rate it a nine out of ten.