D-Link Ethernet Switches Reviews

The solution is user-friendly. 

D-Link Ethernet Switches' switching capacity is low. The solution should improve stability and not support Cisco or Juniper networks. 

I have been using the product for seven years. 

I haven't contacted technical support yet. 

I have used Huawei before D-Link Ethernet Switches.

The tool's deployment is easy and takes five minutes to complete. 

D-Link Ethernet Switches are cheap products for homes and small offices. 

I rate the overall product a six out of ten. 

We use the solution for the network and ethernet connection.

The solution's web filtering feature could be improved.

We have been using D-Link Ethernet Switches for more than ten years.

Brand new D-Link Ethernet Switches are very stable, but the performance eventually depreciates with time.

I rate D-Link Ethernet Switches a nine out of ten for stability.

D-Link Ethernet Switches is a scalable solution. The solution is deployed in our branch, which has five to eight users.

The solution's initial setup is very easy.

Deploying the solution is just a plug-and-play procedure, and it doesn't take much time. We do on-site installation for the solution. I deployed my technical team to install the solution on the remote site.

The solution's pricing is reasonable. There's no subscription when it comes to switches, so we're not paying for a subscription.

Only one person is needed for the solution's deployment and maintenance.

I would recommend the solution to other users.

Overall, I rate D-Link Ethernet Switches a nine out of ten.

We use D-Link switches for our surveillance cameras, Wi-Fi, and local LAN connectivity in retail stores. 

D-Link has a graphical interface that is easy to use.  It is simple enough that our junior technicians can configure the switches. 

The availability could be improved. 

I have used D-Link switches for six or seven years.

I rate D-Link switches nine out of 10. They've proven to be highly reliable over the years. 

I rate D-Link switches eight out of 10 for scalability. 

Deploying D-Link switches is straightforward. You can install and configure a switch in around 15 minutes. There are two ways you can configure a switch. You can use the default interface on each switch or you can configure the switches with a management tool from one computer. It's much easier to use a utility because you don't have to configure each switch separately. 

You don't need a consultant or integrator. It's easy to set up the switches yourself. The technical team lays the cable and mounts the hardware, and I handle the deployment and configuration alone. 

D-Link switches are cost-effective.

I rate D-Link Ethernet switches nine out of 10. I recommend D-Link. Cisco equipment is much more expensive. All of my companies in this country are already using D-Link.

D-Link Ethernet Switches are used for connecting LAN devices for conductivity. In our organization, we have each LAN having approximately 20 PCs attached.

The D-Link Ethernet Switches have to be replaced because they are difficult to manage and security is poor. They should add centralized manageability to make the solution better, it will allow administrators to better know what is happening on the network.

I have been using D-Link Ethernet Switches for approximately 15 years.

The stability of D-Link Ethernet Switches has decreased over 10 years. There can be some hanging and restarting issues.

D-Link Ethernet Switches are a scalable solution. 

We have approximately 500 to 600 users using the solution. The users are from all engineering departments, including the administration department.

After using D-Link Ethernet Switches for a substantial amount of time we had to replace the power supply unit and if they were not able to be replaced we throw out the unit. However, we did not contact the support.

The initial setup of D-Link Ethernet Switches is very easy.

I rate the setup of D-Link Ethernet Switches a five out of five.

The price of D-Link Ethernet Switches is in the 4,000 to 5,000 rupees or 65 to 100 USD range. The price of the solution is not expensive.

I rate the price of D-Link Ethernet Switches a three out of five.

I am looking for another solution to better protect us against both security and DDoS attacks. Huawei and Cisco devices are better.

I rate D-Link Ethernet Switches a seven out of ten.

We use the solution for networking for internal computers and VPN.

The solution is cost-effective with easy management.

The solution could add extra ports.

I have been using D-Link Ethernet Switches for a decade

I rate the solution’s stability a ten out of ten.

The solution is easy to scale.

100 users are using the solution.

I rate the solution’s scalability a seven out of ten.

The initial setup is easy and takes less than a day to complete. One person is enough for the solution’s installation.

The product is cheap.

D-Link is not unified, whereas the Ubiquiti switches are unified.

D-Link is stable and cheap.

Overall, I rate the solution a six out of ten.

The tool's fault frequency is very less. 

The solution needs to improve layer 2 switches. 

I have been using the solution for three years. 

D-Link Ethernet Switches' scalability is good. We use it in 10 of our offices. 

I use Juniper switches as well. Compared to Juniper, the solution is easy to access and maintain. Juniper is complex. We use Juniper in the backbone network since its sustainability is good. Juniper is good for heavy networks and D-Link is for Wi-Fi networks. 

The tool is easy to implement. 

D-Link's team helped us with the implementation. 

D-Link Ethernet Switches' price is good. 

Users need to have some training to use the tool. I would rate it a ten out of ten. 

We use the solution for networking purposes.

The solution's most valuable features are routing, VLAN configuration, and affordable pricing.

The solution’s security features need improvement. There should be more parameters for enhanced cybersecurity, including traffic inspection, SSL offloading, etc.

We have been using the solution for two years.

It is a stable solution.

We have deployed the solution for 100 users. It is scalable, and we might consider increasing the usage.

It is a simple solution. Thus, we can address and resolve the technical issues ourselves. For queries, we refer to online support portals, including blogs and websites.

The solution’s initial setup process is straightforward. It has a simpler user interface that makes the process easier. Although, it requires assistance from a professional if you don’t have prior experience working with it. In the case of a proper network design, deployment takes a day. However, it largely depends on network size. It took a week for us to complete it.

We deployed the solution in-house with the help of a network engineer who could execute it fast enough.

The solution's cost is affordable.

The solution is suitable for small and medium enterprises. It is scalable, user-friendly, and has enough functionality and fair pricing. I rate it an eight out of ten.

I'm both using the solution and offing it to clients. We're using it as a hub. We use it in the main office area. 

The solution is industry-standard for the most part. 

Connecting with smart ports is easy. It's plug-and-play. There is no configuration necessary. 

It is stable. 

We can't use it in a manufacturing context as there is no in-built fan that can handle the heat.

They need to make a product that would support the industrial side. We need them to support a minimum of 350 watts. 

We need them to meet our industry standard, which they do not do.

They need to enhance stability. 

I've used the solution for about ten years. 

The solution is mostly stable. I'd rate it six out of ten. It's okay. Everything is available in a smaller size, so you have to prepare the rack size. It would help if they gave us the proper mounting for this particular device. Only one CPU size is available. We need more power supply.

The solution can scale. I would rate its ability to scale seven out of ten.

We have different clients across the globe using the solution. They are enterprise-level companies. 

Technical support is pretty good. They aren't too bad.

The pricing is pretty good. It's not overly expensive. We find it affordable. We pay around $150. That's a one-time payment. There are no other additional costs. 

We are customers and end-users. 

We'd like to have some smart switches and a good management port with a different control panel. 

I'd rate the solution six out of ten.