Sophos Cyberoam UTM vs Waterfall Security comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Sophos Logo
326 views|266 comparisons
84% willing to recommend
Waterfall Security Logo
122 views|62 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Sophos Cyberoam UTM and Waterfall Security based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Sophos, Cisco, WatchGuard and others in Unified Threat Management (UTM).
To learn more, read our detailed Unified Threat Management (UTM) Report (Updated: April 2024).
771,157 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"There are plenty of features available, such as Full Guard and WAN.""The user interface is well laid out and understandable.""The most valuable feature of the solution stems from the fact that it is a very strong product with good support.""SD-WAN and IPSec features are valuable to me.""The most valuable feature is the solution is easy to configure for users.""The dashboard is very good-looking and offers maximum features. If a customer's website has a problem, we can guide them over the phone because they can easily find the specific option on the dashboard. That's why we suggest buying Sophos.""For a small-medium enterprise this solution is easy to manage and operate.""The solution is easy to use."

More Sophos Cyberoam UTM Pros →

"This is a professional solution which has been the most valuable aspect of its use."

More Waterfall Security Pros →

Cons
"The product is at its end-of-life. There is nothing to improve as it will be discontinued.""The following could be improved: Web Filtering using wildcards; clarity regarding the firewall rules; granular reporting features.""The technical support response time could be faster.""Cyberoam configuration is done through the browser, which is one of the places that viruses spread.""The solution should improve its scalability because it cannot support enterprise networks.""The solution's pricing could be a problem for some small businesses.""I would like to see improvements in the development of reports. The process needs to be made simple.""The Traffic Discovery feature should allow administrators to disconnect unnecessary live connections."

More Sophos Cyberoam UTM Cons →

"The interface of this solution could be more user friendly. The initial set up could also be made more simple."

More Waterfall Security Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "It is very reasonably priced as compared to other solutions in the market."
  • "Licensing is a bit costly, mostly for features requiring subscription."
  • "Licensing is very good value for the money."
  • "It is more expensive than cheap routers, but it offers a lot of functionality, and that warrants the price."
  • "The price is very competitive and the licensing is easy."
  • "It’s value for the money. It’s functionally competitive with higher priced alternative brands."
  • "It is worth the value."
  • "Prices are very high."
  • More Sophos Cyberoam UTM Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Unified Threat Management (UTM) solutions are best for your needs.
    771,157 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The solution works perfectly without any users.
    Top Answer:There are some issues with logs and report limitations.
    Top Answer:This is a professional solution which has been the most valuable aspect of its use.
    Top Answer:The communication in the market of the value and benefits of this solution could be improved. This would improve their sales. The interface of this solution could be more user friendly. The initial… more »
    Ranking
    Views
    326
    Comparisons
    266
    Reviews
    21
    Average Words per Review
    459
    Rating
    8.4
    Views
    122
    Comparisons
    62
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    291
    Rating
    9.0
    Comparisons
    Learn More
    Overview
    Cyberoam Unified Threat Management hardware appliances offer comprehensive security to organizations, ranging from large enterprises to small and branch offices. Multiple security features integrated over a single, Layer 8 Identity-based platform make security simple, yet highly effective.

    Waterfall Security Solutions Enhances Support For Osisoft Pi and continues to invest in secure IT/OT integration.

    Sample Customers
    Gulf Corporation for Technology, Maridive & Oil Services, Fidelity Bank, Petra University, Capital FM Kenya, Safari Park Hotel and Casino, Mayfair Casino, Pacific International Lines, Mozambique Ministry of Education, University of Namibia, Royal Hospital for Neuro-disability, University of Hawai, New Delhi Municipal Council
    Information Not Available
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Manufacturing Company12%
    Non Profit10%
    Financial Services Firm8%
    Government8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company24%
    Financial Services Firm12%
    Comms Service Provider10%
    Media Company9%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Energy/Utilities Company19%
    Manufacturing Company17%
    University10%
    Real Estate/Law Firm7%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business50%
    Midsize Enterprise31%
    Large Enterprise19%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business38%
    Midsize Enterprise17%
    Large Enterprise45%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business17%
    Midsize Enterprise26%
    Large Enterprise57%
    Buyer's Guide
    Unified Threat Management (UTM)
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Sophos, Cisco, WatchGuard and others in Unified Threat Management (UTM). Updated: April 2024.
    771,157 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Sophos Cyberoam UTM is ranked 7th in Unified Threat Management (UTM) with 81 reviews while Waterfall Security is ranked 5th in Operational Technology (OT) Security with 1 review. Sophos Cyberoam UTM is rated 8.0, while Waterfall Security is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Sophos Cyberoam UTM writes "Stable and has a straightforward setup; reporting is fast and easy". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Waterfall Security writes "Cyber security solution used for data transmission that requires training to make use of all of its powerful features". Sophos Cyberoam UTM is most compared with Fortinet FortiGate, Cisco Secure Firewall, Netgate pfSense, Juniper SRX Series Firewall and Sophos UTM, whereas Waterfall Security is most compared with OPSWAT MetaDefender OT Security, Nozomi Networks and Fortinet FortiGate.

    We monitor all Unified Threat Management (UTM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.