We performed a comparison between SECDO Platform and Symantec Endpoint Security based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about VMware, ServiceNow, IBM and others in Security Incident Response."The ease of deployment is a valuable feature."
"Technical support is great. Palo Alto is extremely helpful and responsive."
"It basically automates the entire alert investigation process."
"It is good for detecting signature-based viruses, and it is user friendly."
"Its response time is the most valuable. It is very quick."
"It's a robust product."
"The solution is very stable."
"The fact that it has centralized management is the most valuable feature."
"It just works. We have a console, and I can see it at a glance. I don't have any problems with it at all."
"Symantec's detection capabilities are strong. It involves run protection and behavioral analysis."
"The initial setup is straightforward."
"The price should be reduced in order to be more competitive in the market."
"Maybe the notifications setting could use a simpler setting."
"Many will try to use this as an out-of-the-box solution, however, it needs to be configured to fit what a company would like to do with it."
"We had trouble with the advanced features, such as the firewall builder and all the network protection modules. We were having a lot of issues because it would sometimes block users or the printing, or it would create issues with the network access resources."
"We are not satisfied with this solution. It needs a lot of improvements. It doesn't detect the most recent malware and unknown threats. With most of the users working from home these days, there is also a need for some extra security layer. That's why we are thinking of going for a better solution that will take care of all of our endpoints and work from home situation. Symantec also has to work on EDI technology. Vendors like Palo Alto and Cisco are coming with their own intelligence and cloud infrastructure in which unknown threats are regularly watched and monitored, and they are reported to the admin."
"The overall quality of the product needs to be improved because with the last session we had several issues with new versions. Also, the solution needs better protections."
"If you're not charged with administering the product and you don't do it every day it can sometimes be difficult to remember how to do the simple basic things, so some type of help or guidance for your most regular or frequent tasks would be good."
"The technical support could improve because when you reach level one support there is a lot of delays."
"The whitelisting feature does not work as expected."
"They are lacking the visibility that you get in a heuristical, next-generation AI product."
"This latest version has proven unreliable for management and installation."
Earn 20 points
SECDO Platform is ranked 9th in Security Incident Response while Symantec Endpoint Security is ranked 5th in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) with 139 reviews. SECDO Platform is rated 9.0, while Symantec Endpoint Security is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of SECDO Platform writes "Great documentation, good technical support, and very in-depth". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Symantec Endpoint Security writes "The solution has given us visibility into compliance within our whole system and helped us ensure everything is updated". SECDO Platform is most compared with Fortinet FortiSOAR and Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR, whereas Symantec Endpoint Security is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, CrowdStrike Falcon, Trend Micro Deep Security, Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks and Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business.
We monitor all Security Incident Response reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.