We performed a comparison between Red Hat Polymita Business Suite and SAP Signavio Process Manager based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Apache, Pega and others in Business Process Management (BPM)."The main factor that separates Red Hat software from Oracle, IBM, Pegasystems, is the ability that it gives you to design the screens outside the software and connect it as another component with the BPM engine."
"It is highly user-friendly and easy to use, even for those who are not familiar with product modeling."
"The solution is user-friendly."
"It is a stable solution."
"I have done a lot of modeling over quite a number of years, and I think that the modeling capabilities in Signavio are state of the art."
"The feature that I like the most is the collaboration hub, where every user or every employee can see the process in the overview."
"There are many valuable features, of course. I would say the main value of Signavio is to have your current process map in a way that is easy to read and derive optimization actions to make it leaner, faster, more user friendly, etc. Another great feature is the visualization, which is easy to see and read. How they map the process is also very user friendly, with drag-and-drop functionality. Also, it's a very self-explanatory, user-friendly solution."
"One of the most valuable features is ease of use which has really been a good thing to put into the business. People like tools that they can just pick up and use straight-away."
"Version management is helpful because I like to try different versions and then decide which of them should be the main model."
"I think the documentation for the tool, the official documentation, is not as strong as in other tools. You have lot of community. That is good. But sometimes you need - when you are working on a big client or a critical process - to be certain about certain things. So I think that the documentation for the tool, from the company, could be a little stronger."
"It is not easy to learn the product."
"Technical support has been somewhat challenging; there hasn't been much visibility on how to create a ticket or integrate with SAP."
"I think the biggest selling point that Signavio talks about is its collaborative aspect. However, there's still a lot more improvement in terms of what they can do, how they receive comments, address comments, whether they actually provide feedback, etc. There is still a little bit more improvement to be made on those areas."
"It could use a better user interface, one that is more efficient."
"It is difficult to quickly digest the vast power of the suite and make use of those capabilities fully."
"There are a few bugs when you use the Microsoft Surface Hub with the big screen."
"If you start from scratch then I think this product would be ideal, but if you already have something then it may or may not suit you."
"The solution’s pricing could be improved."
More Red Hat Polymita Business Suite Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
Red Hat Polymita Business Suite is ranked 48th in Business Process Management (BPM) while SAP Signavio Process Manager is ranked 8th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 57 reviews. Red Hat Polymita Business Suite is rated 10.0, while SAP Signavio Process Manager is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Red Hat Polymita Business Suite writes "Gives you the ability to design the screens outside the software and connect them as a component with the BPM engine". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP Signavio Process Manager writes "Has many functionalities and is used to model processes to the former operating model". Red Hat Polymita Business Suite is most compared with , whereas SAP Signavio Process Manager is most compared with Celonis, ARIS BPA, Camunda, Visio and ADONIS.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
