We performed a comparison between Original Software Qualify, Sauce Labs, and Visual Studio Test Professional based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Atlassian, Microsoft, Nutanix and others in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites."Flexible software with multiple functions, e.g. scenario deployment, new entity creation, workflow creation, etc. Technical support for this software is very good."
"Allows us to do JIRA Cloud and BambooHR Integration."
"Maintaining many environments for test is a bear. These guys make it so easy with their CI integration that you can have tests going in after a few hours."
"I find that the multitude of browser and OS versions are very helpful for broadening testing scope."
"There is a huge amount of open source, community provided resources."
"Sauce Labs' dashboards contain multiple useful metrics in one place. Everything is represented to us visually on the dashboard, which helps us understand where to focus our attention, what the issues are, and what we need to resolve."
"Supplying devices to a testing team of possibly close to one thousand testers and developers is a great undertaking but Sauce Labs has made this very easy and a welcomed solution."
"It helped to integrate our performance testing and UAT, which helped to deliver a bug free software for our customers."
"Sauce Lab analytics helped us to get detailed knowledge on test cases execution and logs."
"The solution is very stable; there's nothing in relation to stability to complain about."
"The interface is easy to use."
"Code testing is the most valuable feature of this solution for developing software."
"Visual Studio Test Pro is super helpful for my Microsoft app work."
"Visual Studio is highly powerful. It's probably the best software development tool on the market."
"Its initial setup process is easy."
"The ability to quickly make your own components has been valuable."
"Visual Studio Test Professional is a very scalable solution."
"The reporting engine of Original Software Qualify AQM needs to change. It's very difficult to develop complex reports. Its reporting function needs improvement."
"Start execution time as each time a set of tests start, it will launch a new VM so it takes a bit of time."
"As a web product QA team, we sometimes need to spot check some new child site on multiple browsers and OS(es). It was a little time consuming for us since we need to click on each of the browser/OS combinations and start a new session to test. Every sprint, with new features and child pages being added, we mostly need to do the same steps over and over again."
"I would like for there to be more detail in regards to the quality of our code i.e. how many failures occurred, how many passed based on industry standard metrics, etc."
"The one issue I have is the 14-day trial that a new user gets for free. I understand the concept of the trial period; however, I think this could be revamped to a free 30-minute run time every few months or after a significant update once the trial period has ended."
"Running tests in the SauceCloud can take longer than running in a local environment."
"Unable to segregate reports for tests that are currently being developed, and might not be returning useful results."
"Overall, I think Sauce Labs provides us with a valuable tool and resource. As far as what could be improved, I would say the overall test execution time. Some of the calls take a bit longer than I expect, for example in web browser tests; while the execution time isn't obnoxious, it could be improved so that overall tests/test suites finish faster."
"We encountered minor issues with stability from time to time but Sauce Labs continues to make improvements."
"The solution should be cheaper."
"The solution's documentation could be improved because it keeps disappearing from the solution."
"The solution's deployment is not very easy and should be made easier."
"I would appreciate some enhancements in the interface, maybe adding more color options."
"The product must provide more automation."
"It is not good in terms of performance. When you open Visual Studio, you have to wait for a while to process your code. It uses a lot of resources and has a lot of features. If we could disable some of the features, it would be lighter and faster to use. Nowadays, for some of the projects, we use VS Code for JavaScript or Python. VS Code is very light and easy to use, whereas, in Visual Studio, we have to wait because it takes time to compile or run a project. It has a lot of competitors in terms of performance, such as Intelligent ID. Intelligent ID is very easy to use. It has many features, and it is lighter to use than Visual Studio. In terms of error handling, sometimes, it shows an error before you finish your code, which can be improved. It would be good if it has a version for Linux. I use VS Code on Linux, but I am not sure if Visual Studio has a version for Linux."
"The price could be improved."
"Visual Studio Test Professional needs to improve its stability."
More Visual Studio Test Professional Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points