We performed a comparison between OpenText UFT One, Original Software Qualify, and Visual Studio Test Professional based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Katalon Studio and others in Regression Testing Tools."The entire framework is very useful. It's easily integrable with Excel."
"I find UFT One to be very good for thick clients, which are non-browser applications."
"We have used it for the web and Windows-based applications. It is very productive in terms of execution."
"UFT has improved our ability to regression test."
"The solution has good out-of-the-box protocols."
"The high-level security, high standard and compatible SAP are great."
"The production and the efficiency of making your test cases can be very high."
"The ease of record and playback as well as descriptive programming are the most valuable features of UFT (QTP)."
"Flexible software with multiple functions, e.g. scenario deployment, new entity creation, workflow creation, etc. Technical support for this software is very good."
"Performance-wise, it is a great tool."
"The debugging feature is valuable."
"The tool is flexible and easy to manage. We use it since it is scalable and easy to use. It integrates with solutions."
"Its initial setup process is easy."
"Visual Studio is highly powerful. It's probably the best software development tool on the market."
"The tool has highly detailed debugging features."
"Visual Studio Test Professional's most valuable feature is the rich IDE for doing code and test development."
"The whole suite is made for .NET development."
"Scripting has become more complex from a maintenance standpoint to support additional browsers."
"Micro Focus UFT One could benefit from creating modules that are more accessible to non-technical users. Without a developer background or at least basic knowledge of VBScript, using Micro Focus UFT One may not be feasible for everyone. This is something that Micro Focus, now owned by OpenText, should consider in order to cater to business professionals as well. While Micro Focus UFT One does have a recording function, it still requires a certain level of IT proficiency to create effective automation, which may be challenging for those outside of the technical field."
"Perhaps more coverage as far as different languages go. I'm talking more about object identification."
"We'd like it to have less scripting."
"They need to reduce the licensing cost. There's pushback from customers because of the cost."
"The solution is expensive."
"I'd like to see UFT integrated more with some of the open source tools like Selenium, where web is involved."
"There is a lot of room for improvement when it comes to friction-free continuous testing across the software life cycle, as a local installation is required to run UFT."
"The reporting engine of Original Software Qualify AQM needs to change. It's very difficult to develop complex reports. Its reporting function needs improvement."
"The performance could be faster."
"The solution's documentation could be improved for beginners."
"Visual Studio Test Professional could improve by having better integration with external databases."
"The tool crashes and has high memory consumption."
"Sometimes, the product is too complex to use."
"The price is reasonable, but it's not the best."
"The product must provide more automation."
"The server that we use is very slow so that is concerning for us."
More Visual Studio Test Professional Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points