We performed a comparison between MuleSoft Composer and webMethods.io Integration based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The advantage of using MuleSoft as part as the Salesforce ecosystem is that anything new they build is guaranteed to work with the new features that are coming from the other side."
"The way Composer organizes and manages integration processes is most beneficial. We can easily monitor what's running and what isn't and troubleshoot any data integration issues."
"The product is easy to use. You don't need programming skills to use it."
"The prebuilt connectors have saved our customers a lot of time and money."
"The solution is scalable."
"Our use case is for integration factory for SAP. It is mostly for SAP integration."
"The connectivity that the tool provides, along with the functionalities needed for our company's business, are some of the beneficial aspects of the product."
"There's hardware, software and application integration, providing hosting flexibility."
"Oracle's self-service capabilities, of which we make extensive use, is the most valuable feature."
"It's easy to construct new interfaces like apps and client portals."
"I like the tool's scalability."
"This solution could be improved by offering more integrations with other platforms."
"MuleSoft Composer needs to improve its interface and scalability."
"The technical support team's response time must be improved."
"One additional feature they could add might be something like regional prices. Since we're based in Brazil, we pay in dollars but earn in Brazilian Real."
"The solution's release management feature could be better."
"webMethods.io Integration's installation is complex. It should also improve integration and connectors."
"It is difficult to maintain."
"Rules engine processes and BPM processes should be improved."
"The products, at the moment, are new and there should perhaps be support for the older version of the protocols."
"I am not satisfied with the solution because it takes too much effort to migrate and add new information. The migration could be easier."
"The product's stability is an area of concern where improvements are required."
MuleSoft Composer is ranked 9th in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) with 4 reviews while webMethods.io Integration is ranked 12th in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) with 7 reviews. MuleSoft Composer is rated 8.0, while webMethods.io Integration is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of MuleSoft Composer writes "Handles a wide variety of data sources and efficiently organizes and manages integration processes". On the other hand, the top reviewer of webMethods.io Integration writes "Though the tool provides great connectivity functionality, it needs to be made more stable". MuleSoft Composer is most compared with Mule Anypoint Platform, Workato, Celigo Integration Platform, Microsoft Azure Logic Apps and Zapier, whereas webMethods.io Integration is most compared with webMethods Integration Server, SAP Cloud Platform, Apigee, Microsoft Azure API Management and Microsoft Azure Logic Apps. See our MuleSoft Composer vs. webMethods.io Integration report.
See our list of best Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) vendors and best Cloud Data Integration vendors.
We monitor all Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
