We performed a comparison between Jira and RationalPlan based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about monday.com, Microsoft, Asana and others in Project Management Software."The configurable workflows and boards make it easy for us to execute and oversee our own unique process."
"It's very simple to change the workflow and adapt it. Jira is very user friendly for the agent and the user."
"The ability to change and rewrite tasks is valuable. You can add a lot of columns, change the owners and the change the components."
"I like it for team collaboration and task management. I also like its analytics and dashboards."
"The dashboard and reports tracking and the setup updates quickly, I am very impressed with those features. Additionally, it is user-friendly."
"I have found Jira to be scalable."
"Overall, the solution is very nice and has a variety of great features."
"The features on offer are great. It has everything we need."
"Support is top-notch whenever help is needed."
"Could be more intuitive."
"There could be some improvements in the project management and portfolio level features."
"Nowadays, many organizations are moving toward the Objectives and Key Results (OKR) framework, and this is something that Jira should be able to accommodate."
"The next-generation software projects lack a lot, and I found quite a few bugs. There are some really basic things that you still cannot do. For instance, to put a mandatory due date for a task that you create in one of these projects is still not available. That's a bit of a block because people, especially those who are not technical, are not going to add anything if it's not mandatory. It's going to be difficult to teach them that they should do it anyway."
"Atlassian has multiple tools and it becomes difficult for a customer to process everything differently. Atlassian should combine them and form a single solution for DevOps by including the Jira Confluence, Bitbucket, Bamboo, and others. This would be much easier for customers by purchasing a package, rather than purchasing bits and pieces. With Azure DevOps and other companies, it becomes easier to go with one company having multiple areas that they can cater to, but in Atlassian, the problem is that you have to select different solutions to have a full package. For example, to have document management customers have to purchase Confluence and for Git repository management they have to purchase Bitbucket, et cetera. There is always another add-on that you need to attach to have a complete solution in Jira."
"I have noticed a problem with Jira in the Philippines. In the Philippines, there are only a few companies that offer local support, which is alarming."
"While it's very powerful, it's very complex sometimes."
"We'd like to see Jira have more integration with a development ID."
"We use the desktop version of RationalPlan, and It seems some desktop software has the ability to share a document as a web view. This would be a nice feature allowing us to share our plans with clients without needing additional software. This may be something that is offered in the RationalPlan cloud plan."
Jira is ranked 5th in Project Management Software with 259 reviews while RationalPlan is ranked 20th in Project Management Software with 1 review. Jira is rated 8.2, while RationalPlan is rated 10.0. The top reviewer of Jira writes "A great centralized tool that has a good agile framework and is useful for day-to-day planning, task management, and work log efficacy". On the other hand, the top reviewer of RationalPlan writes "Easy to understand with fair pricing and lots of unique features". Jira is most compared with Microsoft Azure DevOps, IBM Rational DOORS, OpenText ALM Octane, Rally Software and Polarion ALM, whereas RationalPlan is most compared with .
See our list of best Project Management Software vendors.
We monitor all Project Management Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.