We performed a comparison between Informatica Data Integration Hub and Tungsten RPA based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Informatica, Oracle and others in Data Integration."The technical support services are good."
"Performance and flexibility-wise, they're very user-friendly."
"The MDM solution is capable of integrating multiple systems, so it helped us to solve the purpose of centralizing the depository as well as the standardization of mass data. It takes away all the ambiguity around data integrity issues or all the process challenges which happen when every stage of a process uses a different source as master data."
"The OCR was quite stable and flexible."
"Kofax RPA's best feature is its high success percentage in picking up information from documents, especially where the DPI is really low."
"The features that we have found the most valuable are the integration of different third-party support and productivity services."
"You can automate browsing tasks without needing a server connection. The platform provides its browser, allowing you to run anything inside it."
"The most valuable features are workflow and process automation."
"It is stable and scalable."
"Kofax handles UIs via the browser well. If it's not possible, they have other features like modeling screen scrapes, etc."
"The product provided all the security controls that we asked them."
"They could provide more robust performance for data integration processes. It would help in improving the data quality more efficiently."
"When it comes to UI look and feel and user experience, Informatica is not as good as other solutions."
"The initial setup was not very straightforward. Not complex, but not very simple either."
"The scalability has room for improvement."
"The process discovery could be a bit better."
"The product has some constraints and performance issues."
"RPA technology is constantly changing, and sometimes Kofax lags behind."
"The product should improve desktop automation, which is hard to configure. It needs to have custom connectors. It is the only advantage that Microsoft Power Platform has over Kofax RPA. It has more than 800 custom connectors."
"Kofax RPA needs to improve integration with SAP and Microsoft. The professional services offered by the tool's team is below par. Its licensing needs to be more modular."
"Kofax RPA's UI could be more user-friendly."
"The product needs more AI capabilities."
More Informatica Data Integration Hub Pricing and Cost Advice →
Informatica Data Integration Hub is ranked 37th in Data Integration with 3 reviews while Tungsten RPA is ranked 12th in Robotic Process Automation (RPA) with 24 reviews. Informatica Data Integration Hub is rated 8.0, while Tungsten RPA is rated 7.4. The top reviewer of Informatica Data Integration Hub writes "Excellent at standardizing mass data and capable of integrating with multiple solutions ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tungsten RPA writes "A stable product that provides end-to-end solutions for different business problems". Informatica Data Integration Hub is most compared with Informatica PowerCenter, AWS Database Migration Service, Azure Data Factory, Mule Anypoint Platform and SAP Data Hub, whereas Tungsten RPA is most compared with UiPath, Microsoft Power Automate, Blue Prism, Automation Anywhere (AA) and SAS Data Management.
We monitor all Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.